Subforums
17,062 topics in this forum
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.3m views
-
- 513 replies
- 156.4k views
-
- 18 replies
- 968 views
-
- 1 reply
- 9.8k views
-
- 12 replies
- 325 views
-
- 19 replies
- 599 views
-
- 60 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 21 replies
- 457 views
-
- 60 replies
- 6k views
-
- 21 replies
- 975 views
-
- 13 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 588 replies
- 31k views
-
Ursa Cine 12K now available as camera body only with option for recording to dual CF Express for only $7,000 1 2
- 31 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 19 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 34 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 168 views
-
- 3 replies
- 309 views
-
- 225 replies
- 82.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 227 views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 7 replies
- 643 views
-
- 12 replies
- 470 views
-
- 0 replies
- 416 views
-
- 17 replies
- 1k views
-
- 79 replies
- 21.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 677 views
-
- 37 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 27 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 523 views
-
- 0 replies
- 291 views
-
- 87 replies
- 10.5k views
-
- 23 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 14 replies
- 490 views
-
- 1 reply
- 380 views
-
- 4 replies
- 471 views
-
- 11 replies
- 884 views
-
- 33 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 482 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17.1k
-
Total Posts346.8k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Andrew Reid · Posted
It's full 6K readout in full frame 4K innit? SD UHS II is fine for 4K H.265. Even at 50Mbit it looks nice. This is a Nikon Df basically with the new flexible colour profiles. My Z8 is made in Thailand by the way so if this is the same, price could be +36% +20% after import to US. Which makes a used Nikon Df a much better option there. -
This looks like the Canon PZ E-1 power zoom adapter to me. This is designed to be used with the Canon EF-S 18-135mm lens. Obviously it’s no surprise that there is an EF mount of this new PYXIS but the curiosity is them choosing that APS-C combo to illustrate it. Particularly as the PZ E-1 has been discontinued for quite a long while now too. -
-
In that case, why don't these companies just do that? A 2.5k or 3k raw image from a 6K sensor would look amazing, need less storage, have better rolling shutter? Higher frame rates, and be closer to the OG Alexa resolution. Why do they have to force crappy versions just to keep the resolution higher? -
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
The mount(s) look to me like standard locking mounts. And yeah, the second one on the ground looks like probably some sort of PL or EF - and how far it sticks out from the body makes me think the first is probably L or M mount closer to the body - on the other hand, the EF mount on the UC12K is nearly flush with the front of the camera. The thickness of the mount has nothing to do with internal ND's. On the UC 12K, the sensor plane marker on the camera body is about 3cm back from the front of the camera where the mount sits. While I have yet to take off the mount to look, I'm assuming that they put it so far back because they needed space for their mechanical ND swap mechanism. I'd love to be wrong, though!
-
