Subforums
16,971 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 8.8k views
-
- 499 replies
- 143.5k views
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.3m views
-
- 1.8k replies
- 508.1k views
-
- 42 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 27 replies
- 594 views
-
- 94 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 8 replies
- 91 views
-
- 9.1k replies
- 2m views
-
- 42 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 751 replies
- 147k views
-
- 0 replies
- 193 views
-
- 71 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 22 replies
- 865 views
-
- 8 replies
- 660 views
-
- 18 replies
- 916 views
-
- 22 replies
- 889 views
-
- 22 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 244 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 297 replies
- 35.3k views
-
- 64 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 21 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 34 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 16 replies
- 513 views
-
- 24 replies
- 859 views
-
- 4 replies
- 392 views
-
- 25 replies
- 846 views
-
- 99 replies
- 31.9k views
-
- 15 replies
- 576 views
-
- 1 reply
- 323 views
-
- 10 replies
- 524 views
-
- 1 reply
- 185 views
-
- 6 replies
- 345 views
-
- 5 replies
- 590 views
-
- 10 replies
- 438 views
-
- 0 replies
- 288 views
-
- 15 replies
- 815 views
-
- 7 replies
- 670 views
-
- 17 replies
- 631 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics17k
-
Total Posts344.1k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
If I understood this correctly, with the S9 you can shoot both video and stills with TWO crop markers at the same time? Can anyone with an S9 confirm or deny. Ideally, I’d like to shoot raw + Jpeg but with X Pan mode on for stills, ie, the Jpegs would be 65:24 but the raw files 3:2. At the same time, I’d like to stick 4:5 crop guide on so I can keep my social media stills in mind (in post). With video, shoot 6k 30p open gate with 2x crop guides; one 65:24 and the other 9:16. Thanks in advance. -
Actually, it would be worth me crossing the channel on the Eurostar to pick one up! What/where is that 25% off deal?!
-
By John Matthews · Posted
Yes, this is their weakness, for sure. I don't think those Sigma primes really cut it. I've said it before- they need a 28mm f2 and 40mm f2. If they want the S9 to succeed, that's what they need. The more the merrier. Samyang and DJI should do something more at some point too. -
Yes please. My 3 current zoom trio is their f2.8; 20-40, 28-75 and 70-180 and that was partly what sent me to Sony for my stills needs because they are just as real world good as their 24-70 and 70-200 counterparts, but much smaller and lighter. I really like the latest Sigma 70-200, but it's facking huge and heavy compared with the Tamron 70-180 and as above, real world, there's nothing in it image-wise. Samyang of course make their 35-150 equivalent in L Mount but it's too big for my tastes. If it was internal zoom, I could possibly make a case for it but anything over 1kg as a lens these days, is a hard no for me. I was always put off the f1.8's from Lumix though because they just look so dull and for the few primes I have had in L Mount, went with the f2's from Sigma with their metal build and aperture rings.
-
By newfoundmass · Posted
I think L-Mount's weakness, re: lenses, is in a more affordable/consumer sense. Sony and Canon have a lot of options, for all price brackets, that L-Mount doesn't hit. I think Lumix has a bigger issue than not having affordable lenses that average users can get (namely getting their cameras into the hands of average users to begin with) BUT it probably doesn't help. Average users, and heck, even some enthusiasts, don't always need f1.8 or f1.4 lenses. A bargain set of compact f2.8 primes wouldn't hurt the system, I don't think. With that said, their current lenses are excellent and are among my favorite I've ever used, as far as new lenses go. I also think they are excellent value for what they are, though I know some people can't get over how much more expensive they are vs. their Sony and Canon counterparts, particularly the f1.8 primes. But the build quality and optical performance of the f1.8 primes blow both Sony and Canon's out of the water. Still, price often is what dictates people's spending habits. I do wish Tamron would enter the L-mount, but I have a feeling that they don't because Sony owns a piece of them. They've rolled out lenses for pretty much every other mount at this point, even RF, so there has to be some reason for that. I suppose you could argue it's because there isn't a big enough customer base, but Fujifilm might have an even smaller one and they've released lenses for them.
-
