Leaderboard

eyes loves girlies but godamit dis girlie is not a pool shark and aint no actris eye still wants her telefon number but der test is iratatin sexist not sexxy today in the post modern world we have nasa technology but intellectually,spiritually and aesthetically we are going back to the stone age. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OKQdp6iGUk[/media] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSQxlwMzr8&feature=endscreen&NR=1

The images of video cameras affordable for the common people have always been improved. S-VHS was better than VHS, Hi8 and DV were better, HDV was better. Many said about the HVX 200 (below 1k resolution with pixel shift), now the era of indie filmmakers was just around the corner. And it was. Timeless principle. The con- and prosumers are too stupid to realize that they can't win the race if they accept the industry's rules. 4k? Haven't you heard (read andy lees posting above), that these resolution tags are buzzwords to fool the consumers? If your display was 4k and you watched your own 4k stuff on it, you didn't move closer, because the video lacked the true resolution in the second place. And it looked terrible in the first place, because it neither had color resolution nor color depth suitable for a BIG image. You think all this will change with the BM? It will, but in incremental steps (including the fact that you have to monitor the better quality, did you think about that?). At the time every hobby dad has 4k raw, the aestethic standards of cinema will be higher again. All this without mentioning makeup, constumes, good acting, good sets, good lighting, good sound design, music ...