Leaderboard

I can't figure out if you were laughing maniacally while writing this piece, or not.

  Sharpness loss at the edge of frame is mostly a function of the lens itself.  It's only apparent to the smaller sensor after using this adapter because it could never see it before, it only saw the "sweet spot".  In point of fact, sharpness at the edge of frame is better through the adapter on a smaller sensor than the same lens mounted to a FF camera.   Seems lots of people still aren't bothering to really investigate or grok what they've read so that they can add meaningful discussion.   edit: it cracks me up that, even though the adapter IS performing a kind of magick, its critics now feel compelled to criticize the magick itself as if it just weren't miraculous enough for their standards....    "Yeah, you turned water into wine...but you didn't raise anyone from the dead.  Fail.  You suck."

1. buy 1DC 2. Read this article 3. ???? 4. profit I guess the problem for majority is with 3 Andrew ;).  LOL

One advantage the 1DC has is out-of-the-box nice looking images. I use the 5D3 as a reference to re-tune the FS700+MB output (can match pretty closely). So, the 1DC can save time, and time is money.

This is why I bought the 1DC.  The camera isn't for everyone.  1.  Image  - it is better than what people think - knowing how to use it is very important - I'm slowly getting better(which isn't saying much for me as I'll first admit, I'm $hitty).  Although, you'd be surprised at the images it can compare too. 2.  Form Factor. 3.  Photography potential 4.  Batteries 5.  Quiet as a mouse 6.  Stealthness 7.  Solid, solid build - quality 8.  and so on   I wish Canon would give better specs such as 10 bit.  The camera is really alot better than people realize.  The IQ ranks above most cameras.   I'm not supporting Canon or not supporting them - I'm neutral. I am hoping they up from 8 bit color to 10 bit with a firmware update.  They have room to push this camera further.  I wasn't happy with the price, but the alternatives for me were more costly.  Everyone has there likes and dislikes with cameras.  Everyone buys for different reasons.   Life is short.  Enjoy.  Cheers.

@Axel thanxs I'm already working with MPG streamclip so I try that setting. @Gravi... Yesterday I went to a film festival and I bet all those films where digital so ... I also do use the word film in some cases. Let's not talk words though and stay o the topic, Who cares if we call it video making or filming. Everybody does understand what we're talking about! ;)

  Thanks. It is, after all, the final picture that matters.     Yep, I know. Changed it for the feature edit a while back... good thing about a working trailer is seeing what actually works and what doesn't over time.   For the record, I am a font fanatic. Made my kids watch the documentary "Helvetica." They haven't seen the world the same since--especially road signs.

I've wanted to since version 1. Its not here on version 3. We want it and there is certainly no harm in asking for it. Its only a discussion because you are making it one. If you dont need the feature there is no need for you to weigh in on it. We all want the feature, so we are going to ask for it.

It may be a little early but I think it was lafilm poo-poo'ing the very notion of non-professional cameras and solutions by smaller filmmakers making any sort of impact at Sundance or the Academy or other such hoity-toity institutions that only allow the right kind of people with the right kind of equipment to play their reindeer games.   LOL