Leaderboard

The math is simple :) 4:3 x2 = 8:3 (2.66:1) 1:1 x2 = (2:1) 3:2 x2 = 6:2 = (3:1). For 2.35 with a 2x anamorphic you would need something close to a 6:5 aspect ratio (12:5 = 2.4:1). If you want 2.35:1, using 4:3 and cropping a bit from the 2.66:1 image is most effective. For 1.5x lenses just replace x2 by x1.5 - 3:2 would probably best, resulting in 4.5:2 = 2.25:1, needs a small crop for 2.35:1

Hello everyone, Here is a making of and photoshop breakdown of my latest advertising campaign: It's a photo campaign, but I'm sure most of you either work in, or enjoy photography as well so hopefully you will find this of interest. thanks for watching

How so? 1.) The retail price on these things is well above what BM is charging for their current cameras. 2.) Then there is that whole development process thing. I'd be surprised if we see a retail unit on the market in 2015. 3.) For the Super 35, DR is listed as 10 (15 in HDR mode, which i assume means a loss of resolution). Let's see how that works in practice. Don't get me wrong. I hope the Axiom is awesome. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.

At the moment we are 14 on the list, here we are: comurit eeeceegee ( to be confirmed) yannis.zach ( to be confirmed) nahua ( to be confirmed) oznimbus ( to be confirmed) dahlfors silvertonesx24 tonydtv ( to be confirmed) valid anti12 ( to be confirmed) bootsie kristoferman Caleb Genheimer Kerrick ker-Bear Martin At the end of october I would like to send this list to anamorphic shop and see if we can get a discount coupon for all of us on the list. Some of you need to confirm before the end of october please. thank you for your cooperation!!!!

Thanks Julian! I've re-rendered the test and it's the correct aspect ratio. Now I have to test 3:2 with my Iscorama.

Potentially in for this.

There's not much less impressive than bragging about what editing system is used to cut a motion picture. It's editing, for goodness sake. Where you splice the cuts matter, not the razor that does it.