Leaderboard

I think it boils down to how much you really value the larger sensor. It's definitely one of those things that only you can answer if it's worth the extra money. I can see the argument for it, but me personally, it's hard to justify.

Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 but the FF 28-70mm works really well on APSC becoming an equivalent 42-105 without the bulk and weight of a FF 24-70, never mind an actual 24-105 on a FF body. Other than Fuji, I’m not sure I could go back to APSC, for stills/work, but with something like the 40mp XT5, maybe… For video, quite happy shooting crop, especially if shooting different bodies as I currently am. And that is the appeal of something like these new Sony’s… I used to shoot Fuji X Pro2 as my main stills workhorses loving the form factor with primes. One of my options is to go back to that and these new cameras have a lot of appeal…except that lack of 2 card slots and I’m used to 2.1 million dot rear LCD’s… Now if Lumix, Leica or Sigma was to pop out a rangefinderesque body of 60mp… OK, Sigma already does with it’s FP-L and it’s build and form factor are my ideal…but it otherwise falls apart for me after that with; no IBIS, no tilt screen, no twin card slots, Banding City indoors due to it’s electronic only shutter 😏

Might have been a special offer on them at the time or something but I remember them being slightly cheaper than the opposition. And I liked their branding 😉

And they all said the same thing about the 6700 😉

Yeah if you only shoot indoor aircon should be ok.

seems like it has most of the same overheating issues as the a6700.