The OG X100 had that for me and was the first camera for me that had that factor, despite already having been pro for a decade, but everything previously was just a tool for the job.
Almost the same experience with the X Pro1 and 2…almost. I think the single last element that was missing there for me was changing lenses and at the time I wished for 2x X100’s, one with a 28mm equivalent lens and the other with a 70mm equivalent.
XH1 similar to the Pro1/2 feeling, - really enjoyed and wanted to use it even when I didn’t need to.
S1H, kinda, but too big as an every day tool so more a case of extreme admiration.
But in 20+ years, nothing has come close to the OG X100 other than the Nikon Zf which I use as a fixed prime unit.
My only criticism of the Zf…well two criticism actually is A. I wish they had gone for a tilt screen over a flip out and B. that is was slightly smaller.
How does it compare with the X100V and VI?
Well obviously not had the VI in my own grubby mitts but have had the V and for me personally, the V vs the Zf is a tie with one a little more ‘personal’ (the V) and the other a little more ‘pro’ (the Zf).
Zf vs VI, I’d give the nod to the VI now that it has IBIS and that 40mp sensor.
Coupled with the two convertors and the increased ability to crop, it’s close to being a system for me (I would have to chuck in an XH2S with a zoom for some stuff) but work aside, I think Fuji have just taken the original X100 ball and run with it with each iteration but for me, the pick of the bunch are the original (for it’s time) and the new boy.