Andrew Reid

Deary me. Don't overreact! The E-M1 II already had impressive video specs when it came out (quite a bit ago now). The E-M10 III is like that but tiny and cheap, with a different sensor and latest colour processing / chipset. I hope Olympus go from strength to strength. It hasn't been easy for them of late. The camera market can afford to lose maybe Pentax (sad though it is) but to lose Olympus as well would be a disaster. No! I just saved myself £1200!

Cheers. I think it's because these users are more loyal to a brand than they are to a person. I've insulted the shrine of Blackmagic. They are becoming like a poor man's RED cult. Stalin would not be out of place on a pro video camera forum

Pocket Olympus Cinema Camera

Wow quite a few of you going. I'll try to make it There is a nice old camera shop near Photokina in Cologne, good for scouting out c-mount bargains and maybe they'll get the first few Nikon Z7 bodies in Germany That haven't already been pre-ordered that is!!

I can say now the GX9 is a bit disappointing in 4K because of the extra crop (ends-up around 2.5x) and I think it really adds very little for video users over the older and cheaper GX85. I think Panasonic have much better bargains in the range for video. The G85 is not much more for example. I don't have the GX9 with me at the moment, so it will just be an E-M10 III review. It has some mojo in the image I haven't seen for a while at that price and the handling in some ways is more enjoyable than a lot of the high-end cameras. You can switch between 1080 and 4K with a function button sub menu, without diving into the main menus for instance. Perfect detail. Great colour. Solid codec. Wider FOV than GH4 sensor. Seems great in low light too.

Yeah no IBIS is a bit of a deal breaker for me as well. I am just writing a first look at the E-M10 III with 5 axis IBIS, which I just bought from Amazon today. Was only 500 euros but will be interesting to compare to the GH5 considering the big price difference. If it helps out those searching for something really good in the midst of an era of pushing prices up and going high-end, then job done. Unlike the GX9 it doesn't have any extra crop in 4K. Full width M43 2x crop and 1.28x crop with Speed Booster XL. That is a first for the 16MP sensor in an Olympus and I've never had such great out of the camera colour as I have here for 500 euros.

Thank you Glad to help people like you. Not so glad to help certain others on this site. The camera community is like a city and I'm just a citizen like all of you, trying to do my bit for it. Like a real city there will be indifference and lack of gratitude every day at every street corner on display. Block this out and maintain an enthusiasm for living (shooting) is all we can do.

We're a popular forum, we don't need participation for the sake of it mate... If something positive can come out of this, perhaps we can start a new initiative to get some major film industry talents to give advice on the forum - actual top flight cinematographers - in a reddit style AMA? Who would be up for that?

Wanker. He is.

They are cheating YOU out of a review. 1 million page views since August and although not everyone comes here for Blackmagic news and reviews but a LOT do. And apparently to Blackmagic and co, it is not worth even a single demo unit. To John Brawley, it isn't even worth a quick message of support in all 2 years he's been here. A Chinese YouTube channel has a review, or shall we say "unboxing video" with some mumbling... But not us? It's ABSURD. You are contributing absolutely nothing obiWankEnobi @ [***] Says it all!? How about helping somebody for once in your fucking life. Help them make a better film or help them choose a camera, like many of the other members of this forum do?

Tone of voice. Haha. I am not the guy who labeled people who questioned the release date of the camera “clowns”. I am not the person whose way of thanking enthusiastic customers for grading sample videos is to say they “butchered” his footage. I'm not the one who uses somebody's site for 2 years then turns around and Implies the owner doesn't even shoot. Time to fuck off out of here then mate! Banned. Why ARE you here then? To assault me with insults all day long?

Well considering I was just trying to get YOU an early review of the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K... I expect a bit of support and gratitude.

No gratitude whatsoever. You're as bad as the people on the Facebook thread. My family is probably reading that. Who wants to put up with this shit over an f-ing camera?

There's too much fanaticism around brands like Blackmagic. We're all perfectly justified to choose whoever we like for our camera system. It's a shame they are such a let down - for me in terms of the lack of support and John's attitude, and for many others in terms of the tech support issues, release dates and bugs. If you want to see an example of this brand-fanaticism, look no further than my own Facebook followers. They are absolutely pillaring me. I think that's entitlement right there. Who are these idiots who think they're entitled to read one free blog post after another for years with no advertising, from an indie filmmaker, whilst giving back absolutely nothing in return, worse, slinging a shit ton of hatred my way in my own front room, just at the moment he's feeling really quite down?

NoFilmSchool would have chased that opportunity like there's no tomorrow, like a yappy little fucking poodle. I am not going to do it! I refuse to lower myself to that level. Blackmagic do read the blog and know it's up there in the top 3 in the world for covering their cameras, so the radio silence is even more unacceptable. It was their move, not mine.

No, you're wrong. I deserved to be there 100%, in fact it was the least Blackmagic could do to repay me for many years of support I have shown them. The future chances are reduced that's true. I have made a choice. To speak freely. Feels good. It's a lot healthier than being "professional". Who wants to be a professional camera reviewer writing only positive things all the time? DULL! The reason EOSHD will not get an early peek at the Pocket 4K is because I one of the honest ones. In the end do you want EOSHD to be an inflight lifestyle magazine or a reliable resource for camera info?

The nature of the 'inner circle' has a lot of variety. You can be in an inner circle of "yes men" who only write advertising disguised as reviews. You can be in an inner circle of professional shooters who are biased towards a particular company, because the relationship with the company helps their work get noticed. You can be in an inner circle of high profile users offering feedback on a camera, like I am with Panasonic and the GH series. Or you can be in an inner circle for no other reason to promote your blog about cameras, which is the game Cinema5D is playing. I don't actually desperately want to be in an 'inner circle' with the big brands, because in the long run it hurts the content on the site. If I were too close to the camera companies I would even start having to censor negative opinions on the forum about particular products, if they doesn't align with being on-message. Why would I want this? Why would I turn my passion and hobby of writing blog posts about my filmmaking and equipment, into unpaid work for the PR agencies and camera companies? I want only to have the most basic and respectful relationship with a few core companies I respect and use the products of like Panasonic and Blackmagic. I want to be able to review the cameras early and at a cost which is acceptable for me, because I can't go around spending $10,000 a month on new gear just to review it. In addition, if a company is getting an absolute ton of attention on my blog, it is only right that they recognise it and help me out a bit. Good. Close the door after you, there's a very chilly draft!

Hello. Thanks for joining. Back in the GH1 days (2010-11), before we had any Blackmagic cameras at all, EOSHD was mainly about the GH1, and the GH2 after that. Blackmagic came into this market, around 2012 and I was one of the first to shoot with the BMCC and covered it very often on the blog. John Brawley's association with Blackmagic is that he was chosen by the CEO to be the main tester for the camera. Yes he's a Australian network television DP, he doesn't work for the company, but he's something of a figurehead for their cameras. We had the first test footage EVER, from John. We had the first BMCC reviews and a lot of the first news came through John's blog. I've also featured John's opinions and words frequently on EOSHD, but he has never ever given me the same privilege on his side. https://www.eoshd.com/2015/02/john-brawley-reviews-olympus-e-m5-mark-ii/ Yes, Blackmagic know about the blog. Some of them know I am from Manchester but since nobody at all in their UK PR department have kept in touch for the past 2 years, they assumed I was still living in Berlin. It's no excuse anyway. They're an international company sending demo cameras to the Chinese and inviting Italian bloggers to the Manchester event. Call me childish, call me butt-hurt or whatever, there is just something about the whole Manchester / John Brawley double-insult that I find repellant and hurtful after so many years of writing EOSHD and shooting with Blackmagic's cameras. This forum has had so many topics on the cameras and helped so many people. I've said so many justified good things about their devices on the blog and in my reviews. I'll be the first to admit I'm hurt by such a cold attitude from John on this thread and from Blackmagic as a whole.

I've already emailed my contact at Blackmagic in Cheshire about the "ingratitude". He will discuss after IBC, but I don't think I am interested any more. There is a guy in China with a camera on his desk as I type... so clearly they have been sending out demo units left right and centre. They had 10 places at the hands-on event in Manchester and chose to invite Camera Jabber. As you rightly put it, it's just not a fair game. They either want to support EOSHD or not and they have made that crystal clear and so has John, that they don't value what I have do. I will not be a camera poodle writing adverts and at the same time I will not suffer ingratitude lightly especially from John Brawley insulting me in my own back yard while Blackmagic snub me for a hands-on also in my own backyard. @jonpais I owe you a sorry... You were right about the guy from the start! Good finds!! Unbelievable isn't it!? No it's quite the opposite. It's cathartic. I feel like the pressure is off. I can write what I want, cover what I want. It's my blog. I don't know if the Pocket 4K Camera as a tool that benefits me yet. I haven't used one! Neither have you!

What I would give to be the Chinese man in this unboxing video How much useful info are we gaining from this? Not a lot, yet he has a camera doesn't he! John says there are absolutely no camera reviewers with a unit yet. So he stole it off the back of a lorry at the factory or what?

We're pretty far down the capitalist rabbit hole when a basic human courtesy could be seen as 'marketing'. It's not about being into marketing, it's about being a nice person. Yes at the event, some were a new class of marketing people. I don't yet know what their game is. I don't really find their editorial interesting or their technical expertise that impressive, but they are there and they are beating the hell out of me when it comes to the PR networking game.

Here is Panasonic's UK HQ, and me second from right. Panasonic do it right. A tech related feedback session and a friendly meet-up. No wining and dining PR stunts in gin bars. On the table is a pre-production GH5S. Dave at Red Shark was also at the event and I met Holden, the main distributor for Blackmagic in the UK. All of them friendly people. Receptive to technical collaboration and supportive of the blog. All I expected from Blackmagic in the 5 months since NAB was a "hello". The Manchester event would have been nice to go to. I have not even seen the Pocket 4K in person yet, and Blackmagic's Patrick in PR knows this full well. John's response on here was COLD and dismissive. To him I'm just another idiot blogger. Just another blog. And you guys are just nerds to him, who cannot grade. I think it's disgraceful.

How's this for some nice PR John? https://www.eoshd.com/2018/09/why-i-wont-be-buying-the-upcoming-blackmagic-pocket-cinema-camera-4k/

Thread open.

The question isn't only about the codec, it's about the overall spec, especially the use of a full frame sensor as it's intended... full frame! Not 1.8x crop with the expense of full frame lenses. Nobody wants that. You can buy a GH5, and use a full frame lens on a Speed Booster. 10bit 4:2:2. Problem solved! How is Canon offering 'broadcast' codecs by the way. I don't see 10bit 4444 ProRes LOG on their DSLRs. Do you?! I distinctly remember when the C300 came out... 8bit codec... Philip Bloom said I just didn't get it... It was "broadcast ready"! So if the C300 has an internal codec suitable for broadcast, but looks worse than a Samsung NX1 in the real world, then the A7 III sure has a broadcast ready image. And I don't see much better than 8bit 4:2:0 on a C100 or C200 either. Your answer was that Canon was being a little scared biatch. High on power, spitting in the little guy's face Does this answer it then? Maybe CineGain is right?