Andrew Reid

This is part of the reason Gen-Z are turning to old compact digicams, for a less processed look. The HDR smartphone look has become a boring cliche. I shoot RAW on my iPhone 15 Pro Max to get past the heavy handed processing. But Apple have always been better at doing realism in their processing than the Chinese smartphone makers, so by far not the worst offender! If Nikon is right and smartphones are leading into more camera sales, could we see the return of smaller high-end compacts?

What was wrong with it... mechanical issue?

Canon are a different company to who they used to be, they are closer to a Chinese OEM manufacturer now than a Japanese industrial giant in my opinion. How is it that such a mature platform as EOS R which launched in 2018 is having not-fit-for-purpose issues like this in 2024, when Canon has so many decades of experience in camera hardware to build on? It is because the engineering core of the company in my opinion has been gutted by accountants and clueless managers prompted from marketing areas, along with their best people retiring. You only have to pick up the EOS R5 series or R6 to feel from the look and finish of the materials that they are cutting major corners inside and out.

Where in Europe are you?

It's a good value option for many but FX30 doesn't cut it for stills duties... No EVF, no mechanical shutter, no full frame coverage. The 4K/120 comes with a huge extra 1.6x crop on top of a 1.5x crop. Aside from less rolling shutter, the overall image isn't better than the A7 IV for video - and that's cheaper used. Also the Fuji X-H2 is superior for less money too - you get a lot more features overall.

I have very mixed feelings about the OM-1. On one hand, it's a bundle of fun. On the other hand I have yet to see what the 10bit codec brings to the table over the old E-M1 II. Just doesn't seem to really up the ante for me. The other issue is that the noise is very blotchy and it tops out at 800 for clean results - after 1600 it's really pretty poor and 3200 is a bit of a shit show in 4K and fine detail has a pixel-binned or upscaled look to it, rather than it being oversampled as was the case with the E-M1 II. The E-M1 II was the GH5 sensor... And the OM-1 I am not sure what chip it has. But it ain't a GH6 that's for sure. I also find OM-LOG very iffy... It needs a lot of work to colour correct. The E-M1 II I find does 95% of what I need in the OM-1, and given it goes for so cheap, it's hard to justify the extra! Just my take anyway. And the OM-5 basically brings nothing to the table at all! E-M5 III re-issue with a small firmware update.

Does it play Holiday Lemmings?

First post is checked by me, and if I don't like it... banned forever 🙂

So I went with the A7R III of course 🙂 The reasoning goes like this... It was 1160 euros, and the A7 IV would have been 1750. Quite a big difference. The A7R III is a 2018 camera, and in those first EOSHD reviews it remember feeling it was a big step up from the already very good A7R II, because Sony had introduced new ergonomics, new battery, new colour science... And now they have done so again 6 years later, and the a7 IV of course has completely new Creative Styles and menus... plus 10bit and S-Cinetone, which you'd think I would consider a must-have. Thing is I don't. The new menus aren't a selling point, they're a bit of a mess. The new colour profiles are pretty decent, but I am more used to maximising what you can get out of the old ones with EOSHD Pro Color. And the A7r III when set up right has some serious mojo... Maybe a bit of a harsher highlight roll off than the A7 iv, and it doesn't grade as well in S-LOG3, but there is a part of me that doesn't care and just wants to shoot. I tested both side by side for about an hour in the shop, sat down around a table... The a7r III autofocus was as good as I remember it... Can't really see any major improvement on the a7 IV. I tried the Clear Image zoom for Super 16mm c-mount lenses and the Super 35mm mode on the a7r III and again there was no shortcoming, and no clear advantage for the a7 IV. That's quite an important feature for me as I like the look of my c-mount stuff. When it comes to 10bit and more dynamic range I have the GFX 100 and S1H. When I need really good AF in video mode and stills - the a7r III does the job admirably. My a7r III will be mainly for personal stuff, stills and video - with emphasis actually more on stills whereas the S1H takes up some video duties. The video mode on the a7r III really is no slouch... I find the image really very nice in 4K full frame and S35. It also has 1080/120fps which is a nice bonus for such an aging model. The a7r III also has a small edge over the a7 IV in low light, in both video and stills, even thought it has a higher megapixel count (42 vs 33) and is 6 years older... quite surprising. Ergonomics wise, the a7r III is smaller, slimmer, and has an equally good EVF - you don't notice the higher res panel in the A7 IV very much as the resolution of the live-view feed doesn't quite make use of it. So I feel good about saving the 500-600, and will one day get back into the modern Sony cameras... but for now the a7r iii does the job perfectly fine. I'd like to get an a1 again one day... When it comes down under 2.5k then I will strike. It's hard to see how they will ever better it, without a complete change in concept and technology. By the way, I really do prefer the tilt screen on the a7r III over the social media friendly twizzle screens of late. The a7 IV just didn't feel as good to shoot with somehow, when the screen is opened up at the side off axis. There's also no advantage in RAW quality for stills. I appreciate the image in video mode is that bit better... A bit more dynamic range in the creative styles, a better codec, and S-Cinetone is nice to have as well. So a pure videographer's needs may differ and that extra 600 might be worth spending. Let's see if I regret the decision by this time next week 🙂

I would go for a second hand E-M1 II over either of those. They are very cheap now and in some ways even better than the OM-1. The sensor readout is more detailed in 4K. The E-M10 III shoots 4K whereas E-M5 II shoots absolute mud. It was dodgy in video mode even for 2014 standards! If you absolutely can't justify an E-M1 II for 100 bucks more, the E-M10 III is the one to get. Canon Rp is a disaster, stay away from that for video. It feels awful to use and crops like hell.

Interesting. Have they officially announced the partnership? If anyone can threaten the Japanese camera companies it is indeed DJI. They even bothered to turn up in Berlin last week at IFA whereas the Japanese camera companies didn't... Well, Panasonic sort of did with ONE GH7 and TWO S9 in a tiny corner with some microwaves and washing machines. What DJI had on show was seriously impressive. It is however getting more complicated for Huawei and DJI to get the latest silicon. For me it is a no-brainer for DJI to do a mirrorless camera of some description. It could also be that Huawei will want to use the Hasselblad brand (currently licensed out to Oppo) on their smartphones. So the partnership makes sense on that front too.

I sold my a1 the other week, to raise some money which I immediately spent on sweeties and trawling Berlin for vintage PC parts. A fine investment if ever I made one. The problem is I now have absolutely no Sony cameras, at least no full frame ones. For some reason I refuse to part with my old a6500 as it has a nice wooden grip and feels funky. The choice now is between 1200-1800 euros on a full frame a7-something. I don't want to spend another 5 grand. So I've been eying up an a7 IV and an a9. The a9 for me is the better stills camera - it's way faster - however on the video side it only has the old Sony colour profiles and the lightweight 8bit codec. Actually 8bit I am sort-of-ok with, it is the lack of Picture Profiles that lets it down more. The a9 can be had for around 1500 euros / $ on eBay or £1300 in the UK in good condition. The a7 IV has a lot of rolling shutter, a rather clunky sounding mechanical shutter and quite a slow sensor in general so 4K/60p has to be a crop. It does however have a lot else going for it... And the new ergonomics are a big step forward for Sony. The a7r III is another I'm considering... Ergonomics are sort of half way between the older a7s II and new a7 IV - that is it to say, not bad but buttons feel worse and the grip is smaller. It has S-LOG 3 and HLG / REC 2020, fine for 4K/24p, the moire isn't that bad, it's great in low light considering the megapixel count, 12,800 very usable, S35 crop mode very sharp... Can't remember if it has clear image zoom in 4K for 2x crop Super 16mm c-mount lenses... Does a7 IV? Thing is a7r III is a bargain at 1200... So I am very tempted. Spend extra 500-600 for a7 IV or maybe get neither and go with something else?

I don't know... You tell me ChatGPT?

Does anybody know who is making their sensors these days?

The only drawbacks I can see are the lack of auto-ND (aka FS5 since forever) and the reliance on quite obsolete lenses (EF). https://www.newsshooter.com/2024/09/13/metabones-canon-ef-to-sony-e-cine-end-smart-adapter-first-look/ Metabones are good at getting cinema people involved though... First Caldwell Optics and now LC-Tec

That is 250 euros per K. Not bad.

Lovely, very lovely. Liking that it has the clear setting.

Personally, I am holding out for the 20K URSA

Only the lowest prices from me 🙂

Due to having too much stuff and serious addiction issues (to camera and lens drugs), I am reluctantly and bitterly parting with quite a bit of gear for cash in Berlin. If you are in the area and fancy a coffee and a new lens or camera, I am here. The complete current gear sale from me (updated daily!): https://www.kleinanzeigen.de/s-bestandsliste.html?userId=6113630 Some highlights: Fujifilm X-H2 Panasonic GH6 Leica Noctilux Some FD lenses Voigtlander Leica M lenses RED EPIC Sony RX1 Iscorama 36 anamorphic. Fuji X100T And a bunch more stuff. A small price reduction is on offer for EOSHD readers 🙂 I can also ship within Germany and throughout Europe!

It's very odd what Panasonic have prioritised over releasing the S1 Mark II, S1R Mark II and S1H Mark II. They have updated the G9, because that's an insane best seller of a camera isn't it? And it really was crying out to be updated in an S5 Mark II body, hence G9 II and it is now languishing at something like 58th in the sales chart for 2024. They have updated the GH6, as the GH7 being part of a dead system is obviously more important than an S1H isn't it! And now we have the new box cameras, aimed at the cinema market which is currently in a huge downturn, maybe Panasonic want to capitalise on the raving success of the first box cameras, which sold a mammoth 5 units. At this rate we are going to see a Panasonic CM1 Mark II, a GM1 successor (S9 anyone?) and a sequel to the long line of sales chart toppers known by their initials G... as in G100, the vlogging camera. The S9 really nobody wanted it, I don't know why it exists. The GH7 I can just about understand, I'm glad the GH series will die AFTER getting autofocus and not before. The G9 II doesn't need to exist, just use a GH7. The S5 Mark II probably should not have come out BEFORE the S1 Mark II. The box cameras, I really couldn't give a hoot about. Somebody wake me up when Panasonic rejoins the camera market and stops messing about.

Seen as though my retro tech hobby is now completely out of control I decided to get a 2007 MacBook Pro for FireWire duties today, cost 80 euro. Came with some nice music and the SSD upgrade (500GB) which was popular back in the day, and seller chucked a 4S in with the deal. there’s a number of aspects to it that suggest modern Apple have not necessarily gone in a forward direction!!

Yeah the design has gone really far downhill in general, when it comes to websites. Far too much shit and clutter. The worst examples in the UK are local newspaper websites... they are like viruses. The EU did not think through the cookie rules. It should be a browser level setting and not popping up on every site all the time. Also the ad industry and Google ads have not helped... Google abandoned the open web a long time ago and now makes all of its money wreaking it with ads, whilst squandering that on failed products. Google's products across the board are getting worse, including search - now run by the failed-upwards ex boss of Yahoo search! Even Google Maps has become a flawed and frustrating piece of shit too. When the internet was in the hands of individuals and Europeans / British companies it was in a much better place. Corporate US has a lot to answer for.

Some good options there... On PC side it is probably a case of just adding the expansion card to a spare PCIe slot? Or even a PCIe capture card with S-video input. There's also some £80 car boot sale/FB market place Windows XP PCs with a front panel that includes a firewire jack plugged directly into the mainboard. Some external firewire interface boxes are also an option for PCIe sound cards like the Creative Audigy 2 ZS.

High-end production and film industry is in real trouble at the moment. Stuff is not selling. From ARRI, RED, all the way down to vintage lenses on eBay there has been a real slump in demand. It was good timing for RED to sell up to Nikon. Not so great for Nikon though. The question is how long this slump is going to last... Streaming giants are cutting back on new production. Cinemas closing left right and centre across the world. TV is struggling for ad money and social media is taking over casual viewing in the home with GenZ. So it remains to be seen how long RED can last and whether the market correction for high-end gear is going to be significant and permanent, especially with AI on the horizon.