Andrew Reid

Bride: "I would prefer it if you used a Nikon D850"

Get a Nikon D850?

This is a good post. CFExpress cards do get very hot to the touch. So not surprising to see that they have built in overheating protection. However the EOS R5 is not alone in overheating. Other cameras without CFExpress do too. And other cameras with CFExpress do not (1D X III). So the main factor is not CFExpress. I think CFExpress probably does contribute some heat into the innards of the EOS R5 and makes the problem a bit worse. But the main problem is always going to be the throttling of the CPU. Just like in your laptop when it's over the thermal limits. In place of the CFExpress card slot on the EOS R5 should have been a passive heat sink like the Sigma Fp. And the CFExpress card slot should have its own tiny heatsink like M.2 SSD drives do in a PC. A bit of a re-design would be required, but it could all still fit into a mirrorless camera body the size of the EOS R5. They just haven't been proactive enough in wanting a solution. They know that pros should get a Cinema EOS camera, and they want to keep it that way.

ARRI Alexa LF users would disagree.

A small Aussie bird told me: Blackmagic Pocket 6K Pro with full frame sensor may be announced https://www.eoshd.com/news/rumour-blackmagic-pocket-6k-pro-with-full-frame-sensor-may-be-announced/ Take this as a rumour. 8/10 sure about the source. 👍

The initial information was official as well. It was never a pre-production issue that would go away in the retail box camera. That's the Jared Polin line. We don't need another thread with the same topic as the others so this one is being binned.

Alright Toneh? Alright our kid. Wanna go down Market street and score some cameras? Yeah mint. See ya later Toneh.

Surprisingly the original Canon engineer meme garnered over 100,000 views. YouTube audience know high quality content when they see it!

The front page of EOSHD now has several of my shitposts on it https://www.eoshd.com/opinion/sony-announces-new-rumour-camera-yours-for-just-4000/ I sincerely hope nobody reads them! The EOS R5 may indeed be fake. Nobody has actually done a side by side comparison yet! The A7S III does however exist as the infamous Sony Rumours Camera Model 3 4K 120 GRAIL. Even the lambasted Sony menus have all been overhauled to resemble 12 pages of DPReview interviews with powerful Sony executives. The Creative Styles menu now has seven pages of arguments under it about Sony skin-tones and if you select the Sony Alpha Rumors mode the feed from the sensor speeds up and shoots a burst of 200 clickbait rumours onto CFExpress. Instead of a user manual it ships with so many online shopping codes that buying the Sony Alpha Rumour Mark III Filmmaker's Kit will save you $50 on the cost of Sandisk CFExpress cards* *You will need $5000 of them to store 12 rumours

So upset he didn't get a camera, he had to take a cold shower!

Non-jokes will be moderated

S35 sensor does go well in a M43 mount as JVC showed. Blackmagic have such great innards. It is time to step up the game and put them in a camera body worthy of the image, sensor, codec, and touchscreen UI. A $2500 Pocket camera with EVF and IBIS would be a roaring success.

8000 cats, no wonder the EOS R5 pet detection is overheating

Tony & Chelsea subscribers are serious about photography? 😂 That's like saying the 43rumors comments section is full of artists.

EF mount too big for Micro camera. 44mm flange. Hopefully if they have any sense it will be a micro camera with E mount!

I want every post in this thread to be a Philip Bloom 8K cat joke.

Pocket 6K sensor in a Fuji X-T4 body! Oh no wait... No profit in that! Because it's another Potato camera body?

4K at ONLY 30p.

MEDIA ALERT! https://www.eoshd.com/opinion/media-alert-a-canon-engineer-on-8k-and-overheating/

He puts the overheating down to him not getting a sample to do a side by side comparison with at his pool table. If only Canon had given him the camera, all would be fixed and we'd have 8K recording until the $500 card fills up after 10 minutes.

I am relieved to see this... No NOBS sponsor Tony's videos, unlike the NOBS at Canon who sponsor Peter's.

Found the 43rumors guy At first I thought it was Jon Pais but was relieved to find out he's actually Australian.

Fro Knows ProMO Fro doesn't know vidEO Fro Knows PhotOOOOO Fro doesn't know hairdresser

Look I'm not going to get personal here. I don't know the guy in real life. At the 1:10 mark: "Let me be clear on something. There is way too much speculation going around about an issue that doesn't actually exist (yet)". Really?! No. It's not speculation. 100% factual. Canon official test timing info. At 1:23 he whines: "None of the press has had a production camera. All the cameras are pre-production" Perhaps he can explain then why Canon went to all that trouble testing the pre-production camera to calculate overheating times and releasing them publicly if the problem suddenly won't exist by the time the final firmware is ready? Canon did all the testing on the beta firmware camera. Same hardware as Peter McKinnon was given and likely exact same firmware version. It's two weeks from shipping, the beta firmware is basically the final one. The hardware is final. The thermal design is final. Jared just doesn't get it. But then the whiney voice really ratchets up a notch because one of his viewers dared pointing out a fact or two! The viewer said "stop ignoring the overheating". "What I am ignoring?" he responds! "The document that is floating around purportedly from Canon?" Purportedly... I get it... Discredit the facts. Discredit the source. Heaven forbid - Don't mention the original source EOSHD, during the time all other major sites were stone dead silent on it. I am not finishing for credit. But again it illustrates the sheer cheek of it. Clearly I or CVP don't deserve an ounce of his publicity or thanks for expanding his knowledge and breaking the news first to his audience? And when you do simply add up what Polin has said, it absolutely stinks. Gloss over the fact the timings are legitimate. Imply they aren't even final. Imply the overheating is "speculation". Imply there may be zero wrong with the final camera. Say how great a stills camera it is. Claim abject poverty and that the video you're watching puts no money in his account. Say the actual overheating timings may not even be real! And then to top it all off... "If it is real, Canon are really honest!" The sheer fucking cheek of it. His viewers commented that he's "getting his bank account lit up for these videos". And of course he denies it. "I'm not getting paid by Canon..." What he forgot to add was "...this time" This is a guy who has no problems sitting on a beach in Hawaii for the EOS R launch, hotel and flight paid for by Canon. Of course he is getting his bank account lit from the videos. They are monetised. And the gist of the last 5 minuets if you can get that far is... Canon are honest! I am honest too! Now watch these YT ads and click these links so I can get even richer. 160k views on the overheating controversy and of course not a single mention of his original sources for the info. Not even the CVP video let alone EOSHD. I don't envy these creators. I don't get any satisfaction from being handed cameras for free or going on press controlled junkets. I make a good living off EOSHD and don't feel the need to have 160k views on each video. But if people wonder why I'm not championing the American YouTube Circle Jerk and chomping at the bit to join in, well... Here is exhibit B, out of 10,000.