ntblowz
-
Posts
1,919 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by ntblowz
-
-
-
Excellent Video David
Btw Viltrox will release their EF-EFM speedbooster in a month or two, and price will be similar to their current M2 adapter... so if you want to sell yours for min loss it is the chance
from their fb page
QuoteViltrox is going to launch the following items in June to July. Stay tune!
Viltrox 即將於6月至7月推出以下產品，敬請留意!Specification only in Chinese but not difficult to understand.
.EF-FX1 Canon EF/EF-S to Fuji X Auto adapter
Estimated RP 預計售價: US$169
Comment on actual working sample:
Not fast as PDAF in Sony camera. but it focus across the frame including the corners with ideal speed.
.EF-FX2 Canon EF to Fuji X Auto Booster
Estimated RP 預計售價: US$239
.EF-GFX Canon EF/EF-S to Fuji GFX Auto adapter
Estimated RP 預計售價: US$189
.EF-EOSMX Canon EF to EOSM Auto Booster
Estimated RP 預計售價: US$189
(The model number will be changed when launch) -
The next version of Mavic Pro will have 1/1.7" sensor which is bigger than the current 1/2.3" but still much smaller vs 1", guess 1" is too big (or power hungry) even for rumored bigger size for Mavic Pro 2, hence I bought a P4A on special (few hundred dollars off + further 10% discount) recently, the image quality totally blow my Mavic pro away!
-
DJI Ronin S
In: Cameras
8 hours ago, Turboguard said:Gah, I have the money, so might just pick one up. I’ll have the whole summer to practice. And at NAB they showed it with the BMPCC4K so it should work right?
Yes, one of their guy commented on FB that Canon and Blackmagic support is coming in the next firmware
-
DJI Ronin S
In: Cameras
Wonder how those handle C200/EVA1/FS5? With lowered back motor part you can push camera even further back
-
I think it could be the cpu they use for lower end is not fast enuf, there are people saying the old XA2 is much faster in AF and general response vs the new XA5
-
52 minutes ago, Django said:
not to mention i'm seeing some pretty severe spherical abberation from the sample pics of that custom adapter.. usually result of poorer quality focal reducers..
I posted some full res photo sample on dpreview forum.
https://***URL removed***/forums/post/61111222
-
52 minutes ago, Pedro said:
I don't agree at all.
Its not about DOF. Its about distortion and compression.
FF is not just about DOF and all m4/3 users should understand how optics affect the image .You can't get a 50mm look in a m4/3 with a 25mm. You can however buy a speed booster, use FF lenses to get an approximated look...I guess once you actually own the cameras of different sensor you will know, right now you just keyboard analyzing
-
Wasn't there a problem with A7III on the APS-C lens that it keep focus hunting non stop.
-
18 hours ago, DaveAltizer said:
Of course. But I’m a youtuber. All my canon related videos get twice as many views as non canon videos. So I do whatever I can and find anything I can to talk about canon cameras.
What a sellout!
Will be interested to see your experience with c-mount lens.
-
1 hour ago, JurijTurnsek said:
Time to google results with the 30min limit removed then. I seem to remember people had some impressive running times.
Only for Camera with APP, Cameras like A9/A7RIII/A7III dont have APP anymore, so no more 30min hack to them.
I personally bought a bunch of those app, the timelapse app is what I used the most, sucks you can't use it on new Sony cam anymore argh.
-
15 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:
@ntblowz
Regarding the Speed Booster, do you have a link to this guy in Korea doing the conversion?
Also does it Dual Pixel AF through it after conversion or are the electronic contacts completely useless?
I've been very lightly toying with the idea of an M50 but only for my Super 16 glass which adapts and matches the 4K crop factor.
If it becomes a Super 35mm camera, that means it goes from nearly 3x crop to 1.5x crop with your Speed Booster - which would need a reduction factor of 0.5x!!... Seems a bit of a hefty step? Isn't the Speed Booster 0.71x for APS-C? Which would mean 2x crop like Micro Four Thirds on the M50...
The guys is selling again
Everything functions like normal, DPAF works fine (though I do find my 35mm F2 IS USM is more smoother than 50mm 1.8 STM), lens correction for EF lens works fine too (dont have ultra wide to test out distortion yet)
Regarding the crop factor in 4k I thought it was 2.56x? isn't 2.56*.71=1.8x? or is the crop even more? I just base on it on calculation, though I need to test it vs gh5s regarding crop factor to see which have narrow view.
EOS Utility v. 3.8.20 works with M50 on tethering
-
On 5/5/2018 at 1:16 AM, mercer said:
@ntblowz any 4K samples or initial thoughts on the camera. I’ve already seen some decent grey market prices pop up on it, but I’m waiting until more footage shows up before I open the wallet.
I did a interview shot with c100mkii and m50 in 4k after the trip in japan.. sadly c100 @ 1080p is still sharper than m50 @ 4k, but m50 was using efm 11-22mm @ f4 and 2 c100mkii on 50mm stm and 35mm usm both stop down to f2.8 I think, so lens might have a play there.
Colour wise it is still got canon look which looks good without any grading, easily fit with c100 with just minor touch.
-
2 hours ago, Timotheus said:
Your picture shows the Viltrof EF- E II adapter...but that is an E-mount adapter? See here
Can you point us in the direction of a EF - EF-M focal reducer with AF (as there are many 'dumb' options)
Like Alpicat said it was modified to EFM mount and EFM connector at back from E mount, there is no manufacturer making it except some Korean guy who modify other brands to retrofit to EFM mount.
2 hours ago, Alpicat said:@ntblowz @Timotheus I emailed Viltrox last week and they mentioned they're going to release a speedbooster for eosm in a few months - although I don't know when they'll announce that officially. Metabones previously also told me they were looking into designing one but were unable to discuss any details at all. Looks like you had your speedbooster modified to fit the M50 with electronic contacts? It looks great!
Personally I look forward to using a speedbooster with the original eos m with magic lantern, especially now that it can do continuous raw recording at 2.5k resolution in crop mode with the sd card hack.
Good to know other manufacturer are going to make one, technically it should be much easier to do since it just Canon system passing through, dunno why they still haven't make one yet! For me I need one asap for works so can't wait that long.
-
-
45 minutes ago, sanveer said:
I am curious, does anyone know the Exact size of the GH5s sensor? Someone on DVD Forum claimed it was 17.8x10mm, but that aspect ratio seems VERY strange.
The sensor on the BMPCC 4k is 18.96mm x 10mm as stated on its own site.
Sony states that it's IMX294 sensor has a Diagonal Measurement of 21.63 mm (which is in the 17:9 ratio. So, effectively the sensor on the BMPCC 4k is an off the rack Sony IMX294 sensor.
Which curiously seems to be the same sensor on the GH5s as well as the Z Cam E2.
But, the GH5s seems to have uncropped HD at almost 200fps, and then after that it seems to crop in for higher frame rates (please correct me if I am wrong). Whereas, on the BMPCC it claims not to crop in at upto 100 fps or so, and then it crops in. How is it possible that 2 different ratios exist for the same sensor?
That depend on the CPU and programing inside the camera I guess? Like GH5S can't do RAW or Prores or how only E2 can do 4K 120fps but other two can't
-
On my recent trip to Japan, two of my mates (one is doctor one is key animator) upgraded their phone to take better photos, money is not really a problem to them, but they rather spend on new phones than getting a new camera.
Camera is surely going to be more niche in the future, pretty sure Samsung saw it waay before.
-
There is plenty of hobbyist drop big $$ on hasselblad & leica stuff, they cost way more than ursa mini pro
(especially with Chinese tourist i see, they even buy kid's leica camera to use lol)
It is still cheap compare to some other hobbyist like cars/boat/gliders/airplane, we have one person in our work fly a glider every other weekend, another one fly and own a soviet yak-52 as hobby, he said it cost few hundred dollars to fly his yak-52 each time
For me gh5s is good investment, did 20k job with it so already got money back and just come back from a nice trip in japan
(it sucks to go on holiday without spending some on nice food and nice hotel lol)
Though i use different camera when on holiday or other stuff but i m not alone in that one, i also found out some photog use different camera when they are on holiday (i know two use canon professionally but use fuji for other stuff), that way i have a different "mood" so i am actually on leisure and not remind me of myself working.
-
Still in japan atm, I bought the m50 over a7iii because...
a7iii is out of stock everywhere
-
10 minutes ago, zerocool22 said:
It depends on the users. This camera will probably blow the GH5S, A7S II right out of the water. Actually the original pocket already did that.
But I guess if you need high iso, IBIS and all those things, I guess a GH5S would be better. But I don't need that. I use lights, and stabilization tools which are far superior. I feel like 90% of this community is for event, party shooters and not for commercials, or filmmaking.
GH5s doesn’t have IBIS
We did a 20k promo using gh5/Gh5s, the 10bit really makes a difference, when we tried same setting on 8bit in resolve it just turn to banding/noise clustfuck
-
Currently it have problems with flickering on 4K 25p, on 24p and 30p seems to be no problem?
No response from Sony atm.
https://***URL removed***/forums/thread/4263725?page=11
-
EVA1 with the raw update (5.7K 30P, 4K 60P and 2K 240P in RAW) in combination with Inferno's Prores RAW seems like a big winner to me, much more flexible than C200's internal raw which is only available in 4k.
When shooting 4K60P prores raw gives you about 21 min vs 15min on C200's Canon light raw on a 128GB card, but if you decide to shoot 4K 30/25/24 you can get around 40 min of prores raw vs 15min on C200 lol, similar to GH5 with 400Mbps get you around 40minish footage too.. but Prores RAW gives you much more flexibility!
-
Good to know i m wrong, dont mind spend few thousand dollars on computers that gonna last me a while and frustration free.. (*cough* premiere *cough*)
feel pity for people who can't spend on Pro, they are gonna stuck with ARM I guess for future low end apple product.
-
2 minutes ago, kidzrevil said:
Seriously ?! Wow. This was a fave of mine
yeah, the old thread back then
Canon "Fullframe" Mirrorless
In: Cameras
Posted
If their FHD is like C100 quality then it will be a big selling point
Sony’s FHD is pretty soft their in mirrorless except a7s/2 or the old a6000/5100