sandro

I see but when I look at the footage I still feel the DSRL-fake-HD look. Don't you?

Andrew are you going to review this camera with a comparison video with other cameras for sharpness, low light performance etc..? Anyway to me it doesn't look that sharp, I don't see the wow effect I get with the GH2 details

Honestly I don't believe this a bit! There's no way in hell we're gonna get a 550d successor that actually shoots even real 1080p, that could compete with their own high end cameras

Imagine if they will be able to stream the raw data via HDMI... :D All cameras will become 1080p RAW ready

Andrew about your footage...what was the sizxe of the overall RAW files? I read about 7MB per frame for 1920x1080 RAW this would equal to 10GB per minute :|

I wonder what Canon is thinking about this. Their crippling has been converted into a better version of the high end video cameras they want to protect! AHAHA! Anyway how could this ever work with SD cards? Maybe the 550d is out of the game :( 600d only does 1280x340 with problems.

From what I read you need CF cards to get data saved since SDHC is not enough

amazing! Is this something 5d mk3 related or it could applied to other newer cameras in the future? 

  I wouldn't be that sure. I think, especially Sony, they do it very intentionally

look at that. Another proof Canon & Sony cripple their cameras if this cheap toy can do 4k 60fps raw!

Honestly I have no hope for Sony AND Canon to ever release a cheap DSLR with anything near the GH3 and Nikon D5200 in terms of resolution. They have the big cams to protect, Nikon does not.

What I'd like to know is if this Nikon has full video exposure control like the Canons and if I can switch PAL/NTSC in camera.   If the bitrate was higher I would buy it right away, the night shots resolution is really impressive. But 60fps at 24mbps??

The D5200 looks less real to me, the typical DSRL-look even though details seem on pair.

Everytime there's something good in terms of resolution there's always something that destroys it. I bet more will come out along with the low bitrate.

the detail is breathtaking

Besides all the technical facts to MY EYES the GH3 looks less detailed and aliased aka gotten worse! The GH2 was a monster.

I'm afraid you are right. After watching the bearded man comparison the GH3 aliasing is just horrible! What happened to Panasonic???

I see a really strange artifact on that footage. a "fuzzy" effect :| Seems aliasing..

Some night scenes look soft. Is it noise reduction? 4/3 still can't beat aps-c low light performance can it?

[quote name='Germy1979' timestamp='1347712496' post='18101'] I know it's personal flavor....but man, "why the video look?" i wonder sometimes. The best one was a 30p bmc test on a cinema camera. [/quote] That could be an seconding/editing problem before the upload. I doubt it is THAT bad.

You talked about the new sensor size.. What is it then?

I'm watching more and more videos and keep standing by what I said. Resolution is just awful! WHy can't Panasonic just make a full frame GH3 and destroy all these bullshitters at once? :D

From these first samples (yeah yotube, heavily compressed bla bla) I can say that the a99 and vg900 carry the same OLD DSLR look! Soft and fake 1080p, I'm so sick of this. Panasonic still remains the only one delivering a real 1080p detail! Next (year)!

Is this better in low light than the GH2? having less MP even if the sensor is smaller? I honestly can't wait for the comparisons :D

It almost hurts my eyes watching the sharpenedd 1dx footage. Because it's sharpness not actual detail