sandro

One word: LOL.

I wonder if those features (still) missing and crippling are because they're really not able to do it technically or is it the trend CanonSony started? = "since others won't innovate that much let's just do little to no upgrades as well so we can get all the money that we can with zero costs". Did we get ourselves a new Canon/a6xxx?

The NX1 was amazing until the Samsung marketing department came in and decided to make the image look like their TVs = oversharpening, supercolors and "wow effect" as if this product was the for mass to be sold in stores by people who knew nothing about cameras.

You really seem to forget the horrible ISO performance, really horrible, looking like a handycam above 1600. Lenses for low light? Sure get the premium S lenses, used, and you can just trash them after you decide to switch system. Need more low light? Sure buy the adapter for the price of a low end panasonic mirrorless, again that you will trash since it can't be used in the future. It was an amazing product no doubt, anyway let's not forget about its flaws for low light when others were way better already. And fixing those issue by giving away for money for a DEAD system is not something I would advise or feel good about it, honestly. However if the NX2 was real........

Great, lenses used?

Sorry, what else then?

So why don't they?

I wonder how many years it would take other companies to remove those technical limits, Sony can't avoid overheating, Fuju can't avoid cropping...

Actually we're saying the same thing, that's why I used Google as an example. Basically they could just do it just because they can and they could destroy every company out there just for fun (on performance and tech, of course). BUT if they did that in the past and left even while closing down factories... well my friend, they are actually interested in profit.

As long as I wish this was true, it just won't happen. The market is too niche for adding a new product (again), also considering the bad reputation they have, in a niche market everyone knows what they did... abandoned while lying to customers about leaving. wow. Anyway Samsung is so rich and big they could invest in something that one could turn into profit someday or not, Google has money to waste with failed projects I wonder how much they would have needed to sell for the nx1 to become profitable... And selling the sensor to others I don't think it would yeield something close to the nx1.

Don't forget audio compression BT does while sending audio...

Majella national park OT: Auch aus Suedtirol? I've been living in Gadertal/Val Badia for almost one year :P

A cheap ND8! That's in Abruzzo, Italy

Shot entirely with the Samsung NX1 at 60P with DIS ON at 150Mbit using the Nikkor 35mm f2 manual lens. The DIS works pretty good to OK with manual lenses, unless you do weird movements!

so how is the resolution now? usual canon soft look?

Where are you located?

So basically the only option right now for using a speedbooster with full electronic support is to use Canon EF to m43/sony E? Any another option (nikon instead of Canon or Fuji X instead on m43) is not possible?

Is it possibile to use nikon g lenses with full electronic support, auto focus and IS?

I forgot, if the NX500 doesn't have the same NR on video above 1600 is it then better in low light?

Is nx-l still on sale?

Refund denied for the 18-200 cause it's an accessory. What I'll do is try another time with email support explaining my reasons perfectly and then I'll send it to warranty because it actually has a defect (or its made that way, I wrote a post last year about it) and then get a refund cause they won't be able to repair it (probably).

Well it's more because of the NX1 horrible NR that nothing is good for night shooting. Anyway the GH5 is way too expensive for me, add a speed booster cause I'm for s35 look and you add even more money. For instance how do I get same field of view of the tokina 11-16 I got on the NX1? Sony a6300 only does that in 4k 24p, Fujifilm xt-2 just crops in every 4k mode, GH5 needs expensive accessories. I'm currently still an hobbyist and I can't quite justify spending those amounts

Wait I have the 16-50 3.5-5.6 not the S version! night!

How did you come up with 2400 from my refunds? :p

The 16-50 kit lens (not refundable I guess since bought it from ebay from hong kong) and unfortunately the 18-200 that I used once for a job and sits unused since then, also it's not very good. I now asked also a refund for that and they'll let me know tomorrow.