tony wilson

      how many 1 2 3 fucking movies. for fuck sake bullshit satanic hollywood. is it 2 movies or 3 whatever it is these scum deserve to lose lot's of money.   i can get a vhs video from a charity store with 8 episodes of the bbc tellytubbies shows. the one with the gay actor that played tinkywink with his handbag.   why do i need to vomit in 3 movies.. i have worked with ian who plays gandalf. i do not want to count his giant size nasal hairs.   i really hope when jackson sold his soul to the devil he has had plenty of past fun times cos mephistopheles will be calling in the next couple of years for payback.

catonic nice name your gonna love the hobbit. made for zombies just like you. you will love counting gandalfs nasal hairs probably turn you on. go see analogue shot inception at an imax cinema then go see this 300 million dollar tellytubbies shite. if this plastic turd is the cinemas future then the bean counters need to die. this is showboating a high end techno advert meant to impress the new generation hipster yes men director shitters the trickle down effect it is about about turning a movie around in a 3 MONTH cycle that is why hollywood wants film dead. film costs more and it is slower. this new zealand vomit fest is meant to be the van helsing nail in films heart the stuff i have seen looked like rotten bbc actuality. your belief is the scientists just need to tweek a few nobs and everything will be ok. fuck you and fuck corrupt hollywood. paul thomas anderson managed to shoot the master on 65mm by cutting his shooting ratio way down and dumping his cgi and post budgets. clearly film makers decent ones great ones need choice the small willing talented ones should be allowed to shoot film if they want to. when you watch a well shot movie like inception you do not think this looks old fashioned and sub standard you go wow immersive but analogue film gives you a step away from reality. it is just fucking sexy and if it was good enough for welles or kubrick i will take them over the little fat kiwi turd,who seems to have 37 more cameras than kubrick or tarkovsky and none of the fucking talent. when you look at the hobbit clips you ask where did the 300 million go and what the fuck are they gonna do with the 38 reds they got for free as they will soon be obsolete when the next upgrade comes. filmakers need many choices,the majority will not be able to afford analogue film some will. film is dead not because it is a substandard medium it is indeed superior in many ways that arri understand but will not admit and jannard will not compute. film is nearly dead cos of the corrupt morons and the bean counters. when tarrantino,nolan and paul thomas anderson are having to put up a fight to shoot on film you then understand something is rotten and satanic in hollywood rape land. at least david lynch was honest he went to video cos it was cheaper yet a lot of his sexy perfume commercials where still shot on 35mm film. fuck jackson and fuck lucas and that king of the world 3d twat that made titanic. catatonic do not forget your sick bucket for the movies when you go see the gay plastic little folks of middle earth. as your puking your guts into  bucket and wiping the tears away you can revel in how immersive jacksons digital movie is.

dennis in the city in the daytime. when i was young i turned down a trip to the big apple. why because of this mans moustache. i had the idea that all new yorkers looked like magnum p.i. even the women. scary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujbSkWKTuHo&feature=related

if you have to ask what the difference is between british shit and china turds i will assume you understand what is best for your treasure.the question is why not make your own vamp clamp it will look the same once you have drilled 3 holes in the tin.and look at the price difference.[url="http://www.ebay.com/itm/3-Ring-Macro-Extension-Tube-set-for-Pentax-camera-D-SLR-K10D-K20D-k-MOUNT-SERIES-/170889820256?pt=US_Lens_Adapters_Mounts_Tubes&hash=item27c9d3b860"]http://www.ebay.com/...=item27c9d3b860[/url]one other thing since you said hmmmm.ed lee in hong kong and vamp camp both got stuff from me then started selling afterwards. you could say the shitter from london does not sell any way near as much as the others but that just shows what interesting taste folks have got.it is all about individual choice and taste i suppose. dennis parker thought this shirt and tight pant combo was cool. i would have a problem with that set up. [url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ehxyt5kNrvo"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ehxyt5kNrvo[/url]

massive tin 3 dollar vamp clamp for the baby moller is an outrage kind of like putting fat pig ugly hilary clinton in your aston martin yes no : ) moller is treasure don't treat it like shit.. but what do i know hundreds of buyers and happy customers love vamping even some iscorama owners just love dat vamp and it's iron bolt action.

no but a tiny one was made called yashicascope a little soft but if you repair them they are nice. [b]Shintohoscope was a pro lens quite interesting this is a bad transfer.[/b] [b]i love the innocent acting of the young girl in this clip 2.45 in very sweet.[/b] [b]the movie is not so sweet in theme but rather great horror.[/b] [b]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOlEUhSrzBM[/b]

try to find more then you can sell and trade up.. that is a nice looking lens with magic glass : ) mr shiga was famous for making elements by hand so i would be surprised if more than 100 where made.

for dem folks who is new to der tecnography of widescreen filmin. my actor friend steven seegal from der navy cook filum gives a master class in techerneeks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d82j_Qfp_VA

well if anyone is in london and is slick and has shot with anamorphics i have a rack focus dual anamorphic that seems to work pretty well. i should imagine it is more flexible than slr magics one now and has pretty interesting focus range it is 1.33x..

the adjustments done on panasonic,optex and century where all configured for small sensor and zoom lens use with a distance calculation done to get infinity on camcorder. if you adjust pana or optex fixed optic position you can get similar quality if the glass is good some of these mass produced optics had astigmatism because one optic was better finished than the other. wave front errors etc. the restriction comes from fixed optics usually sealed in the 8-16 feet position of the concave and convex anamorphic optic. the flexibility of optex,century in the use of wider angle taking lens also create many issues. the longer telescope optic to optic distance of the sankor design means you get much better c.a. corrections. for the budget system the panasonic,optex adapter system is the economic way. a system combining multiple dual focus cylindrical and taking lens in one sealed system is cheaper than an iscorama copy but still got to be over 2000 dollars.

one lens 200 dollars the other 1200 i do not see 1000 dollars of difference between the 2 optics. slr magic could of been shot on my optex that i adjusted the spacing on. the century optex suffered from shoddy construction allignment. neither lens is beating the panasonic yet that is the issue. good beginnings : )

no i have been to critical of them but i am sure the quality is broadcast quality and superior to any optex,century and panasonic. pretty sure they will stand up against any other new builds that are coming : )

hello i now have 2 redstan hypergonars 1.5x and 1.33x any pro shooter based in london i would be keen to meet in the next couple of weeks to get some feedback. i have been working on these for a long time and am a bit burnt out. please ping me a massage if interested to meet and give feedback. someone experienced with anamorphic lens would be ideal. cheers antiochus66@yahoo.co.uk

Did anyone get their camera yet? dont nose ware it is it gone day cant find um anywares nose i tink day gone missin lotsa tings goin missin we livin in srange times indeed [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8jxXVvrU1s&feature=related[/media]

ping me an email ; ) antiochus66@yahoo.co.uk

looks like they purchased an optex century and have done a variation of that recipe.. an 80 quid ebay proskar would give a more interesting image than that i thought one of the points of scope was to make stuff look analogue

these designs though can never match the better optics as they rely on single element optics and f stop correction. if you take apart any of the great scope optics of the 60s and 70s they always have highly corrected double element achromatic designs. even the poor mans proskar has thick doublets. the panasonic,optex and century all had single element designs using more modern glass types. even with a super modern design like the optex it can never be a match for a modest sankor for corner top corner sharpness.

my problem is i have iscorama and moller and everything else is not.. my redstan hypergonar 1.33 prototype was finished months ago but i need to give it to someone for feedback i kind of put everything on the back burner. the apefoscoperama is already looking pretty good some of these shots are really great this is what patience and energy and drive can do for a prototype super quick as well. this to me already seems superior to optex and century 2 companies that had over 30 years optics experience with a design worked out on a 1990s super computer. flare issues on the apefos optic can be sorted with experiments in coating and finding and matching taking lens. viva brazil

both films are politically a little iffy as far as western destruction of indigenous peoples are concerned. both have superb superb cinematographers and scope cinematography shiga anamorphic fronts made into movie lens built by technovision [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxLFdJLSho8[/media] shiga front old cooke taking lens made into a movie lens for jdc london. very poor quality you tube clip [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfG_orGM_K8&feature=related[/media]

[quote name='QuickHitRecord' timestamp='1351621546' post='20648'] That is a MONSTER thread. I have gotten a lot of good information from it. I think that the price bubble will burst in the next two years when SLR Magic releases their anamorphic lens. [/quote] wow such faith in a china cctv rehouse outfit. that company has not had an original thought yet. the noctor lens they sell is a japanese cctv lens from goyo optical with a m/43 mount instead of c most of the wide stuff they make is cctv lens with wide angle attachments built in. the chinese would make life and quality easier if they just purchased some of the great companies still going in japan. one of the slr guys wanted to buy an isco from me and as he had paid 400 for a kowa thought i might part with an isco for 800 i assume they did not want to spend 4000 dollars on a lens they needed to destroy to copy : ) an iscorama can be used on movie cameras that arri and sony have not even made yet with amazing results no matter what size sensor. an iscorama was never a cheap lens 1400 sterling in the late 1980s for an iscorama 54. when you consider the best nizo and canon super 8 cameras at the time cost 300-400 that is a big price to pay for an optic for your home movie camera. the ebay isco price drop was simply because the super 8 shooters stopped shooting and went to mini dv. the upward price move because of a director putting an isco 36 on his 5d slr magic will not get near a moller or an iscorama unless they use some amazing optic wizz and really improve build quality of existing products.

they are nice the focus is a bit wanky on them not smooth like a good iscorama or a kow 8z. plastic feel to it but sharp optics....dual focus is a compact more modern 16mm film projector optic. try to knock him down he has been trying to sell some of that stuff for nearly a month : )

[quote name='septemberdawn' timestamp='1350782524' post='20058'] Such demonstrations are most helpful; thanks for sharing. What surprises me most is the difference in FOV when comparing the 0.3 with the 0.4 [/quote] and me it almost seems like camera position has changed. superb test the funny thing is it is better that a lot of the shitty tests film crews do when they are playing with panavision or hawk lens. nice focus pulls gonna have to try that wine now.. cheers

i was referring to ebay canada back mounted adapter. the one with the link that will be small and very yummy : ) very interesting recipe a hypergonar design with a 1.5x compression

shiga was a very small company only working with cylindricals. many great scope movies of the 70s and 80s used his optics. mainly massive handmade front mounted types. he started out in the 60s making cinema copies of hypergonar for the japanese market but could not compete with mass production of other companies. the lens you mention would need to be remounted to use on a camera today expensive rebuild. it would of been used with mega cost cooke and angenieux zooms. lovely idea but big investment of time and money

footage is nice. the design of the lens is classic the back cylindrical convex optic is about 5mm to small. so you get smearing,ghosting and a little double imaging . if it had of been a little bigger it would be a beast simply relationship between focal length of taking lens and importantly massive size difference between 2 optics coupled with focal length of iscomorphot i suppose it is a question of finding the perfect taking lens. i have had some and they where in pretty poor shape it is quite a complex lens amazing for it's time really. it was designed for bolex reg 8 so amazing it does that well. i gave up on them because i could not find a perfect one and i did not want another dumb 6 month repair job.