Jacek

16mm Sigma 1.4 (on bmpcc4k)

P6k is twice the price of p4k. It's not an update but different product. It's like saying that Sony A7III is just an update to A6500 (same price difference). Not mentioning media price (p4k 60p works with cheap Samsung T5 ssd, p6k may need something much pricier). For me p6k is not an option. My whole setup with p4k is something around p6k price. And the spec is not much different in my case: don't need 6k (even 4k is little too much for me); need slowmotion a lot, so full sensor 50p In p6k is a downgrade to me; sensor size is the only difference i like, but definitely not worth the price difference. I dont need this camera, but i'm very happy to see it. It has the same software, which means that we will see more fixes, upgrades and more stable product.

Looks like for video there is (based on available settings): - Min iso100, - Internal 12bit CinemaDNG 24p UHD no crop.

I love it too. Records to cheap small samsung t5 ssd (handles all, including braw q0 4k 60p slow motion). Connects to xlr directional sennheiser mic. Love the big lcd and simple menu (all for movie, not like photo hybrids). So easy to use: record not thinking about WB, profiles and not much about iso. Connect the same ssd to PC and start easy editing in Resolve (no transcoding, even no copy to PC, direct from ssd). Braw is great, can choose different file sizes but maintain raw file benefits. Grading is much easier now. Don't care about other gear anymore. Will use this camera for many years.

Price: https://vzlens.com/product/vz40/

How much better for heavy grading is BRAW vs 10bit 4:2:2 with some flat profile/log?

If you put those people who bought BMW/Mercedes into kia/hyundai it would be something like 1.4 satisfaction :). Satisfaction is highly correlated with expectation.

I expect nothing interesting from Sony, so it will be easy to go beyond my expectations..

Is this Nikon's RAW format compatible with DaVinci Resolve?

It is not fullframe 60p. It is 1.5 crop 60p, like Fuji xt3.

Yes

I lika it: (from mirrorlessrumors.com) Recording file format MP4: H.264/MPEG-4 AVC (Audio format: LPCM (2ch 48kHz/16-bit), AAC (2ch)), MP4 HEVC: H.265/HEVC (Audio format: AAC (2ch)) AVCHD Progressive (Audio format: Dolby Audio (2ch)), AVCHD (Audio format: Dolby Audio (2ch)) MP4 [4K] 3840×2160: 59.94p, 150Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (LPCM) 29.97p, 100Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (AAC) 23.98p, 100Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (AAC) [FHD] 1920×1080: 59.94p, 28Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (AAC) 29.97p, 20Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (AAC) MP4 HEVC [4K] 3840×2160: 29.97p, 72Mbps (4:2:0 10-bit LongGOP) (AAC) (HEVC, HLG recording) 23.98p, 72Mbps (4:2:0 10-bit LongGOP) (AAC) (HEVC, HLG recording) AVCHD Progressive [FHD] 1920×1080: 59.94p, 28Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (Dolby Audio) 59.94i, 24Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (Dolby Audio) (Sensor output is 29.97fps) 59.94i, 17Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (Dolby Audio) (Sensor output is 59.94fps) 23.98p, 24Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) (Dolby Audio) MP4 (High speed video) [4K] 3840×2160: 29.97p (Sensor output is 60fps) 23.98p (Sensor output is 48fps) [FHD] 1920×1080: 29.97p (Sensor output is 180fps / 150fps)

Come back to Earth Andrew :), eoshd forum will be dead since September, everybody will be just filming.. Better prepare and move the site to BMusers.com when there is still time.

This forum topic is like live chat - beeping constantly with new replies..

I'm speechless.. This is the end of my interest in gear...

Better looking image: 43rumors source is instagram post: https://www.instagram.com/p/BhVrNQIjDP-/?taken-by=nyachan9 the author (https://www.instagram.com/nyachan9/) confirms: - 4k 60p internal, external raw - Super 16 sensor - flip screen

There are E-mount versions of fantastic, cheap Samyang primes (also in cine-like versions).

I'm using sometimes nd graduated filters if not moving the camera (or sometimes on slider, when the movement is not changing light area borders). When you can use it, the results are amazing (at least for an amateur, like me): no problem to get +3 stops of dynamic range. When the grad is not too hard, the border is not easy to spot even if it does not fit so well to the scene. Additionally, polarizing filter helps a little.

@metoo , but on the wide side. My only lens now - FF 35mm/1.4 would be 18mm/0.7 on m4/3.. and it was soo cheap..

Yes (there is also related law of artistic performance if he is not the composer), completely free (in so called "public domain"). But it is very complex with lot of nuances and you never know if somebody will not accuse you (co-author, text author, different publisher...), unless you buy (with personal license) and record a music directly from an artist. And when you buy Royalty Free License, it should cover both rights, but you never know if somebody didn't make a mistake.. Most safe is to assume, that the right of the recording is covered correctly and the other part check twice or choose something free in this regard - if you publish in internet without geo-blocking, it is wise to use most restricted law (US and EU countries signed the same international regulations, so the law is similar with longest time from death I have seen was 70 years. Don't know about other countries).

https://www.audioblocks.com/ Royalty Free stock music. Not best quality, but very nice and very affordable. Most safe are tracks of composers who died over 70 years ago which automatically release some of their family right. They have free 7 day trial (download 20 tracks per day for free and keep forever) and many discounts (~ 100$ per year of access). When I published something on Youtube and automatically got claim for music right - I presented License from Audioblocks and direct link to audio file - claim was released.

You should tell us the tomato species: A, B, C - looks like regular tomato D, E, F - looks like raspberry tomato The camera should give us not good or bad colors, but true colors :).

Direct link to more of his work: https://500px.com/edlondonphotographylondon

B then D then F

Ah, quick release legs? Didn't notice at first.. nice