cameraboy

we are not in war here .. just friendly talk ... peace

hahaaha.. dude u really don't have a clue... smaller sensor mostly use smaller  pixel ... but this is small sensor with huge pixel ... and my correction was that big sensors are not better in low light they are WORSE ... for the same DOF u need to stop down lens ... example if u want to match 2.8f  of DMB u need to stop down 5D2 at 5.6f and lose 4 times more light... i'm glad i could help u... :)

senor size is not important for low light ... its a pixel size what makes difference .... and BMD sensor has similar pixel as 5d3 .... and let me correct myself... sensor size does make difference ... for the same DOF u will need 4x more light for FF than BMD camera ...

after debayering RED  4K IS about 2.4k so we can expect 1.6K from BMD camera (not bad at all) http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/awilt/story/more_red_res_testing_the_mysteryium_resolved/ and all raw files look soft even RED EPIC (u need to add little sharpness) and it looks like that they use Fairchild sCMOS Sensor(its only sensor that fits BMD camera size) ...wow its rated at 88db of dynamic range ...thats more than ALEXA... http://www.scmos.com/

@garypayton FF sensor dont have cinematic look... period .... i never seen that shallow DOF in movies...things can go to much same as then can go to little ... all that thing start with 5d2 and after some time just become pissing contest ...

how many movies are made in full frame (vista vision)... much much less than 16mm ... and what  is about FF DOF fetish  ... i dont need to focus only pimple on the tip of the nose ... Kubrick made most of his film in 21mm academy format ....

i dont know how people can complain about price ... only software package is 1600$... what makes this camera worth about 1400$ ... + no need for external recorder ... Jesus big companies charge for  firmware  and slog (more than BMD camera price)... c'mon people dont be greedy

yes .. it can only be better... as i see sensor they use is 4:3 ratio ... maybe we can expect option for anamorphic lens ....

and i love that s16 look... very organic ....

because it is RAW... RAW image look disgusting  before  color correction ... and its soft ...even epic raw files look soft ... the guy who shoot this said that he did only fast/dirty correction... if u expect backed image straight from camera than stay away from this baby ....

Includes a FULL copy of DaVinci Resolve and UltraScope software... FOR SCREENSHOTS http://johnbrawley.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/blackmagic-cinema-camera-lets-take-it-from-the-top/untitled_1-66-1/

http://philipbloom.net/2012/04/16/blackmagic/ http://johnbrawley.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/blackmagic-cinema-camera-lets-take-it-from-the-top/ http://vimeopro.com/johnbrawleytests/blackmagic-cinema-camera http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/blackmagiccinemacamera/ WOW!!! no coment...

users praised and worship 5d mark II and make canon household name in video production ...                                that  was panasonic , sony world .... before u didnt hear canon funboy term in video world .... and how canon repay ... they use that free marketing (better than any money could give them ) to overpriced their products...  this is insulting for all loyal canon customers ... but  there good news ... sony and panasonic are now forced to push their cameras with better spec for less money...

re-write the firmware from scratch is almost impossible task without sdk ... but even if they gives as functional  hdmi and sharp 1080p is enough... but who knows canon probably encrypt firmware ...

it will be so funny if magic lantern guys find a way to unlock EOSRAW in 5d mark III ...

looks like that 4K is only in s35 crop.... its APS-H sized for 4K...

and c500 still use 25$ digic dv III  ::)

at least  we know full power of digic 5 sensor .... maybe the best option is removal of olpf filter from 5d mark iii and than wait for magic lantern guys ... @Andrew Reid  can u post just some screenshots... something with fine details ...

this camera goes to guinness book of world records ... most expensive firmware update ... what heat pipes ... canon 5d mark iii read whole sensor and dont use any additional heat pipes?

c300 is so dead ....

and if i am ... your are not one who could tell a difference ...  ;D go on son and make more wild guesses ... u look like a expert for that ... quoting camera spec and not knowing what that means is not sharp thinking.. what i see on this blog is nothing more than that ... i read canon spec and i know what they mean ... what they call "quincunx sampling" is pixel binning ... what they call " revolutionary no debayering sampling " guess  what when u do binning u dont  do debayering.... but for one who doesn't know camera tech only reaction is  " uuuuuu magic" PS:and try to learn how cameras work and what is purpose of olpf , pixel binning and etc ... so maybe u wont be  kick out from other forum for been ignorant ...

Does anybody still thinks that c300 has some kind of magic sensor ... just s35 crop... same story as af100 "this is totaly new sensor it has no any conection with gh1 " really? same tech ....

1. April 1. 2. or genius panasonic move to put control over hack community ... they let as play with bitrates but stay away from hdmi and custom gamma curves ... + good marketing ...

aa filter is made for sensors bayer not output resolution.... people buy panasonic  story when they put too strong aa filter on their af100.. video  olpf  ... ;) and then gh2  stump all over AF100 ...

custom Bayer is marketing  gimmick ... its just pixel binning without debayering .... same as af100 is different sensor from gh1 ... c300 area is 2.8 smaller  than 5d mark III... so 22.3/2.8=8 ... they got same pixel pitch... same tech ...