terozzz

Yeah and losses to 1400€ ryzen laptop. By a lot. Loses even for the cheap ryzen 4600U.

A week ago they used a7III and the skin looks totally different in same studio and light:

Photo from camera and photo from the set in video. (Notice the round thing is slightly of balance).

Here it is, with a7sIII filmed video (95% sure, the filmer when asked if he "likes a7sIII" gived a vink and love to the comment. Now removed): Also that photo up there with a7sIII rigged is from this set, same youtuber:

R5 and R6 heating test from Korea:

Btw, where is that info about temp taken from? I cant find it on canon site..

Its a bye bye sony, 3500$ camera and NO 10bit or 4K 60P? Fail, the biggest flop of 2019... Yes monster still camera but the f@ck Sony even dares to say it is also for PRO video shooters...

I am sure this will never go through. At least in Finland, filming and photography in public places is shielded by constitution.

Well sony is already the under dog. Is the 10bit on a7sIII witch will be at +3K$ too little too late? Canon ,Nikon Fuji, Panasonic already has 10bit internal or external under and +2K$. I wont be buying a7s mk III IF it dont have at least external 4K 60p 12bit RAW at +3K$: No way it will have it, i doubt it'll have even internal 10bit cos of FS5 mk II fail..

a9? oh dear.. 20fps is the only same thing with G9 and sony a9.

Does this work on M version?

Sorry to shoot your dreams down but i do know for a fact that Casey is using sony a7r II and a6500 now days... Mayby he was testing gh5 that day, but im sure he isnt switching to it anyday soon cos the af isnt at the level hes looking for...

Ok,, nothing more to see in here, not anymore. Andrew have you lost it?. well it was fun while it did last. Buy all!

Simple, you. You make the image cinematic :P Its all about you ans what you produce.

Some ppl has become too allergic to a noise. Noise is there, if it looks like fine grain then it's ok. If its is like nasty artefacts then remove it. But an ad to that Sony a6300 is quite clean in S-log2 up to ISO 16.000. And in photos, not bad at all. (ISO 8000)

Who gives a flying F*#¤ about JPEGs? Take RAW photo and then look who's the boss. IR tests are irrelevant, no real use at all to me.

My test with a6300 in real life low light S-log2, ISO 12.800-25.600

"A7rII Super 35 4K: More detail, better in low light (Clean in S-log2 up to 3200 Iso), far worse rolling shutter (31ms)." Well then better to take a6300, it has clean ISO max 16.000 with S-log2. Even ISO 25.600 is quite clean:

Panasonic GH4 has 4k but it has much less rolling shutter/yello problem than a6300in 4k, but GH4 has crop of 2.49x in 4K UHD. Now the a6300 has clear image zoom and when you use at x2.0 you will reduce the rolling shutter by 50%, that way you have crop of x3.0 so its a x0.51 more than GH4 but it looks amazing. You can also use clear image zoom at x1.0 so you will get about same crop as GH4 and you reduce the rolling shutter by 25%. This video was shoot clear image at x2.0 with Sigma 60mm F2.6 art and S-log2.

I did quick low light test between cine4 and S-log2:

But look.. RX100IV has S-log2 also!!

Yup i did put up Cineslider, lights, steadycam and shoot it in 20min. But cos im amateur i didnt want use them.. alone... Also the Sun didnt want to put pause on the rising.. Idk why, i did dance to it but hey i tryed

Isso 3200 24-70mm f4. yeah we vaned bit shaky cam but it wuld be better stabell :/

Shoot in 20 min : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRD160_z0RY

Is this true? Nikon D5500 at iso 25.600 that clean? https://vimeo.com/123315281