Jump to content

ND64

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    812

  • Joined

About ND64

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    .
  • Interests
    .
  • My cameras and kit
    .

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    .

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

ND64's Achievements

Frequent member

Frequent member (4/5)

480

Reputation

  1. ND64
    Like what limitation?
  2. ND64
    Once you have access to the RAW data, you should be able to make any magic sauce you want with that. If you can't, its your fault. In still photography world it was a known fact, untill fuji marketing team pretended its a revolution if its done in camera.
  3. ND64
    That would be "Krasnov" 🙂
  4. ND64
    But it would be a bold move in Trump era to have a heroine named James.
  5.    ac6000cw reacted to a post in a topic: Panasonic Lumix S1R Mark II coming soon
  6.    ND64 reacted to a post in a topic: What's Sony up to? (March 26th new camera teaser)
  7. ND64
    Some youtubers complained about its build quality. Early reviewers don't talk too much about these things anymore.
  8.    Walter H reacted to a post in a topic: Panasonic Lumix S1R Mark II coming soon
  9. ND64
    https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/RN_e.htm After you selected the camera, click on the name above the chart, it opens the table As you see in R5m2 all points are triangles, meaning noise reduction on RAW at all ISO settings.
  10. ND64
    If the sensor is non stacked BSI, read noise should be lower. A7Rm5 read noise at base ISO is just 3.4e. So despite higher resolution (smaller pixels), has almost half stop better DR.
  11. ND64
    Almost no DR advantage for being non stacked! I don't know it shows Panasonic got it wrong, or Nikon did a great job with its stacked design
  12.    ND64 reacted to a post in a topic: Indie filmmaking, sometimes you have to improvise! A diff frame made out of rifles, with human stands
  13. ND64
    Overal average shipped value is a lot lower But that's because of all apsc bodies out there. At $800 their profit margin is very thin. So they have to double it at least. That's why the $1500-2500 area is so crowded with options.
  14. ND64
    So it wasn't Dji making a L mount camera after all?
  15.    Ninpo33 reacted to a post in a topic: Fujifilm X Summit Livestream 20/03/25
  16. ND64
    I think it looks chonky because its a power zoom APSC lens.
  17.    Juank reacted to a post in a topic: Fujifilm X Summit Livestream 20/03/25
  18.    eatstoomuchjam reacted to a post in a topic: Fujifilm X Summit Livestream 20/03/25
  19. ND64
    They could make the lens faster without making the body bigger. I'd like to have a soft corner f/2.8 that jumps in sharpness at f/4, than having no f/2.8 at all.
  20. ND64
    NR is not an issue. It's a strategy to satisfy that part of the market that is obsessed with noise, with the price of making others who prefer data integrity angry; and apparently that sounds reasonable compromise for some camera companies. However, I don't know what's going on with DPR's studio shot that even at base ISO, there is noticeable difference in resolution (not sharpness) compared to similar sensors:
  21.    ita149 reacted to a post in a topic: Panasonic Lumix S1R Mark II coming soon
  22.    Juank reacted to a post in a topic: Panasonic Lumix S1R Mark II coming soon
  23. ND64
    Panasonic uses NR on still RAW in a still oriented camera, let alone video. Reviewers bash Nikon for its h.265 implementation that doesn't allow to disable NR, but say nothing when Canon/Panasonic doesn't allow to disable it on RAW!
  24. ND64
    Sony giving its most expensive sensor for half the price? I doubt that.
×
×
  • Create New...