ND64

I strongly recommend reading this article. I recommend everything Jack writes on his weblog. Its a treasure. https://www.strollswithmydog.com/on-white-balance/

50hz vs 60hz defines the ecosystem that the device is compatible with. "24fps or more", is intentionally mentioned there to prevent still camera makers, who were already using raw compression for still images, to make Cine cameras that shoot raw internally. If a judge doesn't understand this doesn't mean its not clear.

Sorry, the first line is technically incorrect. You don't have sensor look. You have CFA color response, which isn't perfect, because we don't have perfect chemicals to use in color filter to get perfect response. There are some differences in this not-being-perfect response between different sensors, but its way smaller than you think. So when we use matrix transform (to bring raw data to our desired color space) we end up with errors. Then we use LUTs to correct those errors as much as possible, with bias to "true to life" rendering, OR "pleasing look" rendering. You simply choose how the color be wrong! You don't find a sensor with better look. You find sensors that are better profiled to be aligned with your personal bias. Bottom line is you can make ANY raw image to look like Arri, if you think Arri looks good. The reason behind that sometimes its difficult and time consuming is not that there are some shortcomings in the sensor itself. Reason is the company is not open to share the data about their sensor CFA response and white balance pre scaling, AND they don't bother to give you proper LUTs to ease the process.

Don't want to be "akshually" guy but.. If its RAW, it has no color rendering. Color is what RAW developer software provides. Image sensor doesn't output a "look".

Which means they're guarding the act of compression itself. Frame rates and level of compression are also stupid. Its like to patent a CPU with 8 cores to prevent anyone else making any CPU with more than 7 cores. Nobody should be allowed to patent the scale of something.

They should have patented the algorithm of compression, not the compression itself, because 1- compressing raw data is obvious 2- done before on still raw up to 5-6 fps in DSLRs, like Nikon D2x.

Because most of the judges don't understand the technology behind these things.

Sony IBIS problem is not like it can't move a lot. The problem is overcorrection. All IBIS systems should be content aware. They should know whats going on in the scene. Respond to vibration isn't enough.

What's up with this dance trend in promotional videos? It should give me information, not entertainment. I can evaluate the noise and DR in a single frame from a simple shot.. just show me a dark room with a bright window.

Basically they patented a condition 🙂

Big corporations couldn't even imagine someone would patent the idea of saving RAW file.

Sony A1 read out noise at ISO 640 (the lowest, or true base) is only 0.927e which is insanely low. Now assume that we combine the ISO 100 image with max saturation capacity, and ISO 640 image with lowest noise. We have 20log(39579/0.927) and thats 15.4 stop. And that would be at 1:1 signal ratio, which is only useable after temporal noise reduction in post.

Its like Russian invasion of Ukraine in fear of NATO Expansion (RAW recording for all). Its an unwinnable war for Ukraine, but I hope they win.

Seems you think reputation trumps physics.

There is no exception. ARRI didn't reinvent the CMOS sensor, they just achieved lower noise floor with double readout. State of the art CMOS is limited by 15 stop, which 13 is useable. These are so clean that they're only limited by shot noise. In other words, the noise problem is already solved; so to increase DR you need to work on the other side: saturation level. Unfortunately its so hard to increase the saturation capacity that Nikon celebrated when they achieved 1/4 of a stop more capacity and called it ISO 64, which in reality was only ISO 80.

No BSI, no fast read out, no clean 4k60, no CF express slot, and ridiculous EVF for the price. Fuji gonna be fine.

I don't like to say that 17+ DR is a marketing lie, but even state of the art CMOS sensors can't reach that level.

4k raw is obviously pixel binned, but pixel binned NRAW seems cleaner than pixel binned ProResRAW.

Check newest reference guide. There is a table for all bitrates.

So NRAW compression ratio is 4.5:1 in High quality and 7.5:1 in Norma quality. 30 minutes or 50 minutes of 8k24 with 512GB card.

I couldn't find it. However its always possible to get moire with 8k resolution. Modern lenses out resolve sensors, even at 100 megapixels. If you want zero occurrence of moire you have to stay in aperture range that diffraction happens, or simply use a softer lens.

Gerald Undone says Nlog is only for preview and is not applied to the file.

The good news is NRAW is apparently not a linear raw. Bad news is it makes massive files. ProRes RAW is line skipped in full frame, but native 5k is available with crop.

I can make a jpeg look identical to 14 bit raw, but "visual" quality is not the point of raw. Lift shadows 3 or 4 stops and then compare again.

Why invest in poor people which is always risky? Invest in their picture 😂