OlegKalyan

interesting result and conclusion, still more scientific test needed, no skin, human faces so far, that was the problem with BMCC, hope Canon performs better in that regard.

could someone who has access to camera and ML patch shoot a chart?

Hi Andrew, could you test Raw 5dmk3 vs C100, in a test

Is it available in Germany? we got one in Moscow, it was some kind of preorder, demo, couldn't get a hold of it.. Does anyone know if I can order it directly from manufacturer?

will setting up timeline to super white help?

Thanks for the test!

in vimeo look pretty much like the rest of the good stuff on vimeo, no more, no less

why 5dmk2, not GH2, which sounds more similar?

http://vimeo.com/40932867 hope you like some shots! ;)

Great well done video.. wrong cam.. croma clipping, color mud is clear, after all the grading done.. GH2 would have done better job, imho.

Thinking of getting LA7200. Any experience of what lenses can be used, which can not? any obstacles to use the adapter on GH2, D800, full frame? Thank you!

Do you notice magenta tint in shadow, with no OPLF, can it be corrected in Color correction, how many stops IR filer east up?

thanks, try to fild a moire there!! ;)

M43, PL and Nikon should be the options. I mean, we can all to to Canon to Nikon adapter, as we used to do in the day when 5d did not have aperture option, for about a year,  4/3 seems to be most reasonable choice of lenses, so close to BM

to me  Black Magic Cinema camera, is a "right direction camera", that does not look good enough compared to hacked GH2. Nikon D4 with HDMI on board is a best choice at the moment, possibly not for resolution, but that "filmic" 35mm look that many commented on vimeo. WIll I buy  Black Magic Cinema cam?  You bet! good thing to be able to use 4/3 lenses on it.

"Some of this looks pretty cinematic to me as well. https://vimeo.com/28203770" blown highlights, the sky, chroma clipping that's what I see a lot in FS100 footage,  more than in GH2, AF100. setting the camera could be the reason, not too many users could set up AF100 correctly, in their tests.. It's a bit trickier than GH2, which is straightforward good.

looks ok..

It looks sharp.. and .. soft at times, how did you focus?

Can someone have a link to a FS100 clip or a short film that looks "cinematic"? I still have not seen convincing material shot with it, and quite a lot with the AF100. Please submit a link(S) please!

I own two GH2 and AF100. I like the hacked GH2 in a low ISO up to 640.. then AF100 is the king, great cam that needs to set up correctly.. can't wait when it's updated with the new filmware.. going to compare it with FS100 some time soon, to me very similar images those cams produce..

Мy friend has Helios 58, 2 Helios-44M 58, 2 Zenitar-m  50 1.7 He just want to sell it for any reasonable offer, got them as a gift, some time ago.

http://vimeo.com/40363062 took the camera for a quick dynamic test, like it so far!

http://vimeo.com/40196608 if someone not seen it yet. so far seems to get right results pretty hard to those having the Ninja

I live in Moscow, let me know if you need any help, do not know where to get lenses you've mentioned, do not own none of them.. I have a Russian Lomo Illumina 18mm 1.3 PL lens, which is great.

Hi, Andrew. I would put Panasonic АF100 very close to Sony FS100. It's for sure better than GH2 when it comes to low light, the amount of noise, has a better codec than GH2, with certain settings perform miracles.. (Philip Bloom never really went into correct settings in AF100) Not to promote here the Panasonic, just for a reference and the prospective. I think use AF100 can be found at a better that $4000 price tag. Nikon D800 on the other hand has a better "Look and feel" than 5dmk3 in "bread and butter" videographer ISO till about 3200, better colors and definition. (Not to neglect Nikon out of current offerings). Nikon D4 on the other hand is somewhat better in low light than 5dmk3.