sanveer

Every AI is stolen work. I remember watching some asian film whose story was apparently written by AI, which turned out to be a Hindi film, released a few years before. All major Corporations into AI, are using copyrighted and private work without explicit permissions, release and compensation. Starting with Google and Microsoft. The question is how much similarity can quality as AI work, and how much would impinge upon the original. This colour scheme and grade hardly seems absolutely unique or never used in film before. Also people wearing coats or high rises in the background is also not really one of a kind. Hollywood and Dems are just frustrated with Musk. This probably is just an excuse to try and take him to court. They'll go to any extent to sue, silence and cancel anyone on the opposite side.

Very interesting ... Basically Sony shot itself in the foot with this sensor. Twice.

What a damp squib. They could have Totally avoided this ...

Tangerine Budget = $100,000 This film's budget = $75,000,000 That is 750 TIMES the Budget Are we really comparing budgets here

"However, Danny Boyle’s forthcoming zombie flick, 28 Years Later, was shot over the summer with a bunch of adapted iPhone 15s, WIRED has learned, making the Hollywood thriller, with its budget of $75 million, the biggest movie to date filmed with smartphones." This is apart from the Insane Lenses Attached to the Camera, big budget additional gear, God knows what else etc. Tangerine was a film actually shot on an iPhone woth attached lenses. But genuinely shot on it, with minimum extras. This Danny Boyle film saying it's shot on an iPhone is just so ... dishonest

What's new in these cameras? Do they have newer sensors, or even PDAF? Why is Panasonic suddenly releasing these two cameras? " ...Multiple IP Transmission Standards ..." So basically the same cameras with slightly better connectivity?

Really sad.

What is the Sensor Size? P.S.: I was being lazy about watching the two videos. It's a 1inch sensor.

Like I mentioned in one of the threads, Nikon was on the path of making THE SENSOR, about 3 years ago. Which, incidentally, happened to be a 1inch sensor. The only issue I can think if, with it, is, probably that its Only 18MP (17.84). Everything else is in the superlative for it, from dynamic range, ro frame rate. (http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.com/2021/02/isscc-2021-nikon-1784mp-1000fps-sensor.html?m=1) One advantage of a smaller sensor, is the insane form factor flexibility that it allows cameras to be made into, from the DJI Pocket 3, to Smartphone sized cameras (with even multiple cameras or collapsible zooms), or tiny Point and Shoots with great manual control. Maybe someone can make a l16 Light type of Camera with multiple 1inch Sensors, but without attempting to fuse images. They could have multiple cameras with difference zoom ranges, with cameras whose angles can be changed, to be able to record wide and mid, and other angles, simultaneously.

I am guessing a few things are happening. Panasonic is trying to get rid of the old 25MP FF sensor inventry. Which is why the S9. It's a good camera for the price and sensor size, but it has some issues which Panasonic doesn't want in the next generation of FF sensor. Panasonic needs a New Sensor greater than 24MP and Way Less than 60MP (somewhere around 40MP if it wants 8k). That sensor would make it to most of Panasonic's FF Lineup. It has to be excellent for Video, and have Reasonably High Resolution for Photo. Rolling shutter shouldn't be too bad, and it needs a huge variety of frame rates and resolutions for video. My guess is, after Nikon's working with Sony, Panasonic too is trying to ensure it gets a custom sensor, with design and features almost exclusive to Panasonic. Also, it probably doesn’t want to have the exact same or similar models at Leica, so that the market is better spread out between the two.

You cannot Unsee his Insanely White Teeth, once you notice them. So Basically this camera is an Unreliable FX30 with massive overheating issued in Real Shooting Conditions (not under controlled environments). With No IBIS and a few other strange issues.

There was this debate that smartphones will get better than ILCs, by 2020-22 or so. Suddenly smartphone sensor and Computational Photography/ AI development slowed down almost plateauing completely. In some ways the trade embargo on Huawei and Samsung and Sony mysteriously abandoning Triple Gain Sensors that they had presented papers on. Also, there were some talks on improving optics on smartphones much beyond the plastic lens optics currently used by the majority of the market. Somehow all of it was abandoned, and smartphones never became equal to or much closer to ILCs. White for dynamic range, colour accuracy, low light and a few other parameters they can be great, in real pixel to pixel detail, and exposure latitude, they aren't comparable. Until they improve Computational Photography/AI with the intention of replicating details on pixel levels comparable with ILCs, this seems to be something a bit in the future. While Topaz Labs and many others do it, including increasing resolution and even increasing bit depth, I wonder if it's actually as good as something shot on higher resolution (above the 12MP on smartphones) ILCs (24MP and above) with good quality glass. Smartphone photos, for now, only look good on small smartphone screens. On larger displays/ monitors they look strange (semi water colour pixalated).

I didn't mention anything or anyone here. I was merely reminiscing about a very eminent grandfather-grandson filmmaker duo, who are also famous polymaths and who haven't apparently gotten their due. Has it become a crime to remember great filmmakers?

Why does it appear that the great Ebrahim Saadawi is among us ... 🤣🤣🤣

Seems pretty stellar. Dynamic Range should be tested and also whether it has heating issues in warmer environments. Also all other 24MP sensor makers need to improve their sensor tech. This had some superb rolling shutter.