avrofilmvideo

The only thing i am missing in Canon 1d-c is peaking and 4:2:2 recording in 2K. WHY not to use the same 4:2:2 codec in 2K???? Japanese logic...... Anyvay to pay about 3-4 grand more is fine.

[quote name='EOSHD' timestamp='1348165653' post='18727'] There might be a different AA filter design on the 1D C but other than that, same camera hardware, just tweaks and firmware added. [/quote] Had camera in my hands 2 Days ago. Other then different filter design on sensor camera can shoot more then 30 minutes, it has got crop(s35mm-that doubles your lenses), can do 1080-50p, Does have clean 4:2:2,does have C-log,can do 4k 4:2:2 internally AND WILL BE AROUND $11,000. Is to be released January.

[quote name='Germy1979' timestamp='1347875797' post='18312'] Canon confuses me. I love Cinestyle and the way canons see color.. (i know that's an oxymoron since cinestyle flattens out everything, but even grading it, i seem to get more aesthetically pleasing results) - But the GH cameras have cleaner images and more lens options. Then in order to have the shortcomings of the Canon's that the GH's automatically don't have, you need another $10,000. I guess I should just stfu about it & realize....in the end...... ........they truly were... Stills cameras. "gh cameras have more options" I am lost now ;-( í ½í¸” [/quote]

Hmmmmmm, now can Canon Match This ?

That's right..youngsters Off to School.. TADA have to go now-time to make some $$

It is subject for another time.. It is time for you to go to school now and study hard to be a real cameraman...if you do not understand term "crushed blacks". Also looking at other shots from other Video sample- this camera has problems with Highlights Clipping...that could be due to Internet Compression ... while i had camera in my hand for a while it was quite HOT...I have no idea how it will perform outdoor Down Under in Hot Aussie Summer. BOTTOM LINE IS,IT IS GREAT CAMERA FOR $3,000 as long as You have Glass Designed for it. Question is also, why do you need for Corporate or TV work RAW?? Decent 4:2:2 Codec(if possible 10 bit) is great. I would rather spend $8,000 on Sony FS700.. Good Luck to Black Magic and their customers...they are forcing other manufacturers to design better camera..

[quote name='cameraboy' timestamp='1346706798' post='17242'] "black is crushed" in RAW? HAHAHAHA.. someone waist 20000... no good in low ligh ? maybe not in12800 iso as c300 ... but if u spend 20000$ for lens feed them with light ... this camera is close to arri alexa and epic in image quality ... and many people wont believe and i expect lame reasons why as "its a 3000$ cam" ... [/quote] Cameraboy, Please name me 1 single job YOU shot on RED or Arri ALEXA Please.

Oh Dear, every time i see those nice PHOTOS with CP.2s on that camera i am amused... Lenses are BIG part of film making. In past 27 years making living as cameraman and working and selling my product to TV Stations i have spent up to $60, 000 on single camera. People who spent $$ on L Glass or better will not be impressed with WIDE END..Full Stop! Destroying my Zeiss 21mm or Ducloss 11-16 or new Zeiss 15mm is not ON. So while i am impressed with $3,000 AUS designed camera(and i am Australian){proud one too}, i am not happy about Sensor Size. So lets make now some Good Wide (SUPER WIDE) glass for this fantastic Camera. P.S. Camera Boy-One can NEVER waste $ on Good Glass, it will last you long time Habibi :-)

Why would i cripple my set of $20,000 Zeiss lenses on this camera. Yes codec is nice but camera is not. Blacks are crushed, it is no good in low light, digital processing inside camera head is nothing special. For somebody new without any glass it is ok to get it with Tokina 11-16 and 16-50 . Others with their current Canon glass might as well to get into Astronomy :-). It is cheap but it is camera for 2 months.

Why for fs no 50P? Why 50i? Do they(canon) have to cripple everything like Sony? Is it such a big deal in 2012 to have at least 720-1280 50P recording??

50P is missing in 2012

No 50P in 2012??? not even 1280-720 50P BIG MISTAKE

[quote author=OverCranked link=topic=613.msg4435#msg4435 date=1334937945] [quote author=avrofilmvideo link=topic=613.msg4407#msg4407 date=1334895460] I am not going to say anything about what it takes to make decent camera BUT why would anybody cripple their nice fast wide ZE/ZF lenses on this box which looks like was designed by Stalin ENGs in 50sss.. just imagine what it will do to a new Zeiss 15mm f2.8 [/quote] Either you haven't seen the Great Stalin's era and his stuff or you have not seen this camera  - there is no relation at all. On George Bush style fear campaign you are starting here about the lens mount could you please get Dick to issue a press package for the public knowledge/ propaganda. What the heck are you talking about !? Every where there are demo video clips and still images of this camera with Zeiss lenses that are 10 times heftier than your dinky 15/2.8 ! Find something else to troll about please. [/quote] Mr Troll, What wide lenses do you specify for this camera?

I am not going to say anything about what it takes to make decent camera BUT why would anybody cripple their nice fast wide ZE/ZF lenses on this box which looks like was designed by Stalin ENGs in 50sss.. just imagine what it will do to a new Zeiss 15mm f2.8