Emanuel

@androidlad C'mon, let's spill the beans! Where did you find it? Source? : ) Here are more two colorful samples to prove both the high bitrate acquisition capability + raw properties and nicely highlights roll-off put and nothing harsh as videoish tradition and many others out there gave us for so long since electronic capture popped up -- what times we live today... Now add anamorphic glass... ...and you'll be able to reach this with hands for ; -)

Indeed. Exactly same experience here. Reliable suppliers : -)

Simple occasion! Private deal from a sister of a Portuguese private seller when he sold me a few MFT lenses moving to new Canon's FF mirrorless system. New introductions always mean bargains in the existent gear. The woman wanted a new Canon unit as well. I took the chance, she asked 200 euros and I offered 300 euros for a bundle to comprehend that one and a Panasonic's 1" FZ1000 she had in hands as well. Reason also why bashing new releases of a different manufacturer is pure meaningless, plain stupid and fully nonsense : -) @BTM_Pix That's a great find! I almost feel compelled to not resist to keep going my collection of outdated *cough cough* g̶a̶d̶g̶e̶t̶s̶ capture devices... LOL Really : -)

https://www.lg.com/us/laptops/lg-17Z990-RAAS8U1-ultra-slim-laptop?tag=gv18rm0119

BTW Take a look on that smooth a7RII AF... (2nd video) ; -)

And here are other interesting (2019) ones and a comparison table in the 1st two links: https://www.amazon.com/HooToo-Wireless-10400mAh-External-Performance/dp/B074LHG47K/ https://www.amazon.com/IOGEAR-GWFRSDU2-MediaShair-Wireless-Station/dp/B00XEW4L56/ https://www.ravpower.com/p/ravpower-filehub-ac750-wireless-travel-router.html Beyond this much portable solution: ...there's still such most powerful solution already known: https://www.amazon.com/Linksys-Wireless-Dual-Band-Anywhere-EA6900/dp/B00EXK14S0/ https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ON7AX3U/

Any other takers? Suggestions? Here's one of the gadgets available out there: Audio is absent a good part of the video so my apologies for the content posted but you can get an idea from the subtitles anyway. LOL : ) Here's another one (in French): Both of them above are limited to 300Mbps Wifi so USB 3.0 speed access is pretty irrelevant and out of range over there. This one even less for a half of speed: Here's an interesting tip here: Which might lead us to overcome USB 2.0 limits through faster Wifi going along Dual Band 2.4GHz 5GHz: Or then following that secondary route:

No more complaints on the P4K monitor stuck in-body... I guess ; -) LOL Add one of my fav phones today and you'll have an instantaneous movie theater wherever you want: Live TV now can reasonably mean live cinema! : -D

You didn't get a bit of it, you two dudes! They are tags, #tags...Just kidding now : ) We live in a peculiar and random age, guys. Hard to find anything original and reliable today LOL No place for lazy gullible netheads. I saw the clip on YT, I found it NOT impressive to be honest as written BTW. I thought it could end useful for someone else whatsoever. Seems it was, to you two at least! haha So useful someone else found the original source. Not much interested considering the material, actually. I'm sorry but no patience in a Sunday morning for that. Let alone to ignore that mainly, a wide shot would also be the best way to properly test 8K acquisition IMO. So let's also blame the OP/tester to be accurately fair too : P No matter what and our brand loyalty as well the usual DR frenzy or customary pixel peeping fever over here :X So my job finished before I could interest myself to go deeper there. There is a S35 model to comprehend this release so the guy has shorten'd the whole thing. Not surprised : D Good job anyway : ) Keep going your great service to this community, your technical forum policing is always appreciated and welcome ; -) Speaking of devil, here's an interesting discussion why such testing methodology makes little sense to evaluate a 8K capture device to begin with -- that is, for pixel peepers included:

Not the best test, however...

Something missing here is the fact (or not) about the sensor native resolution used, as well, color depth and bit rate as for instance. That equation counts much more than some other nonsense math for the subject matter strictly based on 4K vs 1080p or 720p acquisition. There are other variables completely ignored over here on this discussion.

It depends on the level of detail of the shot and the size of the picture displayed, obviously. Where crop magnifications can pop up the differences in-between. There are human limitations, as well. Which means a much more noticeable difference from SD to HD or from 720p to 1080p rather than from 2K to 4K or even as far as the next 6K or 8K steps concern. Except if you'll print a large format. Then, the difference can be crucial between to have it or not to have. It is what it is. Like when you won't probably notice the difference between 10 to 100 millions in your bank account as much as from 10,000 to 100,000 or from there to 1 million. There's always a sweet spot in everything. In my country we're used to say the virtue is in the middle, for some reason ; -)

I don't see any drama about it. You have 2 hours and a half going on this route:

But much less, let's not even compare, as much as happens with the P4K : ) In the meantime, here's more on topic:

Not really with the OP: : -)

https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/26940-blackmagic-pocket-cinema-camera-4k/?do=findComment&comment=287942 https://www.amazon.com/V-Mount-Uninterrupted-Supply-Battery-Panasonic/dp/B01B6011GO

What is it? From where?

About glass...

More on topic related:

*Here's an attempt to organize scattered information from different sources* (also comprehending such long so far 400-pages thread where became hardly feasible to find anything in the middle quite likely forever and ever lost somewhere there... : -)