Emanuel

Any mirrors for?

hehe yeah, I guess I love to compliment people making fun of it when happens (not exactly on someone, for my goodness sake : ) so you've got it right : )) Positive interpretations also have a merit of their own, even when needed or not. In other words... If I praise something you did, I guess we both should be fine : D There are people with eyes and some other with eyes too, but lacking all the rest variably no matter how the efforts raise the bar :X Your comments often show it is unlikely you miss anything out there ; ) always appreciated, man :-) Without mention, we share the same principle aside new technology entries: there are no outdated cinematic cameras...

LOL No, not at all : ) I even had to google it in order to improve my English now hehe I've learned a lot with you, pal : )) I only think as much as I appreciate to learn with older people than me, I guess people who have no memory of the past (even recent) also have something to listen from people with more experience, of course. Besides to be really funny how people comment (as written in my post, a little bit everywhere wrongly spread on internet, so spread all over not exactly only here) on something which costed dozens/hundreds of thousands (pending on configuration) free now all included in a package with an inexpensive tool able to provide 12-bit RAW 4K... Oh well :-) That was the point.

Shane Carruth -- one man show there ; ) hadn't spilled much about it. Nick's tip however hinted his Driftwood Quantum 9b... ;-) as much as seems so. I suggest to you and everyone to actually watch it (asks for twice and subsequent screenings like any substantive food for thought served as movie entry ; )) ...and start to pay more attention to the wise posts and those cameras recommendations of your own and top-notch eyes the standard of your input discloses, pal :P - E.

To me used to see dozens/hundreds of thousands invested on AVID systems before... let alone the hours paid directly in the film lab's bank account... all this seems too odd to read (without extreme roll eyes) several comments written on such completely nonsense posts, a little bit all over internet *phew*

LOL: ) hey Glenn... @mercer have you ever seen this feature film shot on GH2?

Let alone the 10-bit mantra... :-D

Well, Canon did it on RED in the last decade... : ) Even earlier the C-line series of today to have launched as following step ;-)

LOL You are. But with that BMD rep entry I already had dismissed the case... ; ) Better 400 than 800 anyways : ) BTW that talk about free Resolve is rather funny to not say ridiculous :X Hey guys that one is a DaVinci... that one, remember? :-D

No, I did not : ) Any link to?

Danilo is a very enthusiastic artist I have the pleasure to have met personally... Be welcome here, ragazzo :-)

...you two Don and Jon, you are a must... LOL : ) This forum would become another one without any of you ; ) Cheers to both, E :-)

*rolleyes* scusa : ) No St Anthony per te : )) Maledizione di un portoghese ; ) Seems like to say from nowhere that your best 2nd half's face sucks... LOL :-)

How high ISO you went on GH5 there?

Yeah, but origin? :-)

That Bob Caniglia from BMD about 1:25 minute also states 400 and 3200, so I know nothing for the subject matter :-)

And what about the sensor there?

oh my... where have we just arrived?! Next masterpieces won't be made by humans anymore... :X Silly but effective for silly motion picture entertainment. From now on we risk to have TV from poor to poorer... :-D

Resolution for sure not : ) Details? Will you need to end there even risking to end with oversharpened borders for outcome? No way you reach that as actually real cinematic, count on it if so : )) As much as no details will praise the cheater, no good devil you'll find in the details when more than anything, perception is your game after all (E :-)

I read somewhere about June. Indeed. Hope Vlogging may push the boundaries, as matter of fact. Funny to write it but that's the way it is. Media convergence times advantage, I believe :-)

Correct. Day and night for first time with this new generation cameras to begin with EVA (solid name for : ) Why other than that? ; ) Dual base ISO there is 800 & 3200 though :-) https://www.proav.co.uk/videos/blackmagic-pocket-cinema-camera-4k/

120fps @4K [Z cam E2] To stand corrected there : ) AF will be limited on BMPCC 4K as far as we can guess. Useful comparison table anyway :-)

That's what I wrote up there above that same post on reduser : ) It is always nice to listen some others' opinions though, it is what we have for now :-)

That's how it looks when from a monitor directly @ NAB booth recorded on a smartphone (courtesy by Raymond Zananiri):