Emanuel

LOL Just two is more expressive than a single one :-)

Yes, following that, seems more a particular weakness from the device against other ones which perform better. Nothing related to color sampling nor bit depth for sure : D As said, I still watch his videos. Just take them with a necessary pinch of salt :-)

This is my conclusion following his reviews from a good part now. I don't have here a comprehensive list of when and where I've arrived to that outcome. I don't see him as totally inaccurate. I still appreciate to enjoy his reviews and comparisons, no matter the pinch of salt I extract from his finds he always run to publish and spread. I just don't see the world B&W there. To say it pretty straightforward, that's a principle I do try to apply to everything and everyone. E :-)

From inaccuracy to the opposite there's a long way to go ;-) As posted, he puts all his effort to rid of that. His Sony videos often pop up sooner than other devices he reviews. I don't think he's more biased than we all tend to be. Independence is hard to get. I much believe in the accuracy of Andrew's finds than the majority of the reviewers out there.

I'd much prefer to wait for Andrew's input rather than Yuryev's anyway. The guy puts some effort to deviate himself the fact he's always testing Sony tools at first hand in any case.

Yet seeing the tool as demanding on the way you have to approach to deal with it. It is like a marriage. We can't handle a 2nd wife like we did in our 1st round or we risk to still fail no matter our goodwill to work around the task. Workarounds have their own specs from their own. We don't invent them, we need to adapt them. Filmmaking is invariably a workaround, the tool is primary and secondary at the same time; never the shooter though (E :-)

You did it all :-)

We should all ask so. Not all girls can be pretty. We wish. But happens. Somehow different of a lack of character for sure...

Thanks for posting though : ) BTW, have you checked your shutter?

There are IBIS and IBIS... But something which puzzles me is the fact when we focus on the cons rather than the pros. We all know there's no perfect world out there, only on forums' wishful thinking lists :X No one is also praising to see our neighbors to always pop up pointing the flaws of our children and be quiet about theirs, isn't it? A bit of equity at least should be mandatory before any forum comment. BTW, no personal agendas of any kind and attacking the deepest bias of our own too...

IBIS is not a miracle but a tool for shaky hands. We know some of users would like to have a toaster all included, seems unlikely to happen though ;-)

Mate, go figure if it was the GH5S... hehe Never mind, convinced now. No publicity is bad. First video to watch back to work Tuesday morning :-D

@mercer LOL Better to keep that screening on hold... Hell of a curse! :-D

Good night man or more likely to address you happy morning there instead, I believe ; ) And please be back to the old good chap we met and I still think we all want to hear that from you : ) I miss that, at least. This forum is not the same without both of you two in good vibes (I guess no need to explicitly mention the name of the other forum rebel as well, right? :-)

@mercer Don't state that too loud to Fuji though! :D

Glenn, ISO will distort the results when directly affects DR per se. Tired or not, he's right on that one : ) hey, I am tired too... it is 3:00 AM over here, Sunday night or Monday morning :)) Same ISO on both devices should be a different story, of course :-)

Yes, got you now : ) This is what happens when we (myself) lose scope. To be out of context leads to this lack of perspective from my side as your reader this time. You wrote you were tired, I misread that : )) Thanks for correcting my entry anyways :-) Both, though natures of a different kind obviously, they are not so unrelated as apparently people tend to think in one way or another...

Did not follow the YT video... Only the comments of you all now : ) Obviously DR is not the same raising the ISO bar. What to say then? Discredit, to say the least, right? The other side is the reader's side. Pretty valuable BTW ; ) And if you edit your post without giving notice to the other side, well, that's unfair game :D my dear fellow ;-)

Ah... on that one, yes indeed. Bit rate can perform a play part, obviously. That one is pretty inaccurate from the reviewer side. For some reason GH5S dual ISO is paramount. Just read the whole thread now :-)

Both methods apply :-)

So, "more than secondary, subjective scope is even less than that"... I dare to understand from there. Really? Jon, take a look on your previous input we already know on topic (I guess you didn't change your mind...) versus Andrew's now as for instance following this post of yours. Subjectivity means there's no superior judgment anywhere. Better than saying the other side is wrong, I guess. Far away to be silly instead. As much as no people should address personal attacks in these boards as well. People should have their chance to express their own opinions, isn't it? Actually, it is what that subjectivity is all about, let consensus flow for once here at least ; ) Let alone this holiday season, go figure. Makes me truly unhappy and should make somehow part of a rest of goodwill left inside any of us. The same when you are the target. Happy Easter to all! Oh yes, that XH-1 (I think my sins are forgiven now because I let the X-T2 in the shop shelves :D) along the GH5S make my days beyond the season (E :-)

http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/software/firmware/x/xh1/index.html

Seems ergonomics is actually as much as subjective me and others had referred about after all... ; ) The same for SOOC outcome too where Eterna does shine indeed; not even need to apply for Fuji's color science paradigm, I'd dare to add now for the nth time... not always too much though for a few incomprehensible voices of hate here :X No matter how long the usual suspects have claimed against, isn't it? ;-)

Thanks for posting :-)

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 (or the plain FF 24-35mm f/2.0 in a much tight range as 2nd thought if you want to get rid of vignetting in all extension, even though this won't be much of a problem along video crop format especially if you'll avoid the wide end going with the XL version; no issues whatsoever with the Ultra version) will give you the focal length you're looking for. It is the best bang for the buck you'll even find nowadays, no other glass offers you the same. Hope this helps, E :-)