Emanuel

*update* Comprehensive test to come (just posted by Daniel*) * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H06EXJn2k3M&lc=z23jjznhrmu2zfggb04t1aokgujkxtfhciyfmwhtx5ygrk0h00410.1508030539094930

Daniel has just posted that he will update a new test today. I've asked him to test it with longer focal lengths beyond 21mm on the anamorphic, 6K Photo and stills 4:3, 3:2, 16:9, 1:1 modes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUFJ9OJ28As&lc=z23jjznhrmu2zfggb04t1aokg4yuojbg2mjsv5thjvplbk0h00410.1508016665373862

Do you mean the update only in order to fix the v2.0 bugs?

I do really appreciate Daniel as well his honest gear tests. Very responsive BTW. Pity he has no more in his hands to add his input. Beyond his creative topics on his GH5. Thematic subjects in-focus are also a value-added indeed. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5HAPKYbBL6ogj2GWO_gE6A/videos Humble buddy, that's my cup of tea.

Hey guys, OP will only play a test, not supplying a new firmware update! :-)

And on the anamorphic, 6K Photo and all 4:3, 3:2, 16:9, 1:1 stills modes? Have you tested the vignetting along such lens on all or any of them?

In any case, it will be hard to beat the Queen...

Different mount because of AF perspective, I guess. No place for SpeedBoosters, etc. So...

No idea why so much buzz about the mount. 4/3" had been SB friendly BTW ; ) Further Osmo compatibility should also be your concern really... C'mon :-)

Interesting test from Daniel:

@JazzBox Simo, hope this helps! :-)

...gorgeous...

You're welcome, amico mio! : ) Sent you PM, please check your PM box :-)

Simo, have you already tried any one of these tips? https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/24937-gh5-autofocus-improvement-on-new-firmware-update-for-soon/?page=3 https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/24937-gh5-autofocus-improvement-on-new-firmware-update-for-soon/?page=2

Open the thread :-)

^ > up there < Here's the 1st part:

The next 10-bit hybrid... So far, the only one to give you such stuff amongst other goodies in a reasonable package ;-)

One lens, One love, One life... my friend ;-) Great song BTW: Apologies to Bono Vox, but as much as the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 nothing beats the unique when some_ONE pops up... :-P

No other one can beat it... 4/3" format coupled to SB too; covering FF from mid to tele end as well.

I don't think 100,000 can ever be less than 25,000 ; ) so I can't take that as much orthodox or even valuable, I'd dare to say, I'm sorry : ) Extra resolution or 4K for the sake of it will always give you a better cinematic whatever adjective we want to. The point is 75,000 can be not necessary if you only need 25,000 for : P or the extra 75,000 might be more demanding. Reckless argument when even wedding filmmakers or consumers are adopting such standard. Not necessarily mandatory though when by then, you may need to apply something you're not willing to, as for instance, because of a different workflow of your own or sharpness per se to end in acuteness unwanted (you can add blur @post anyhow) and not in your plans or needs into a specific project or sort of work, style/aesthetics and so on. Without mention, from larger you can always go narrower, but not the opposite, so there's nothing 1080p is able to become that 4K acquisition or 4K -> 1080p cannot. This reminds me the peregrine idea that digital can't show grain or mimic film stock when comes acquired in bits and bytes... *cough* *cough* E :-)

Simo, have you seen these?

Indeed. Here's another one -- different results accordingly distinct settings; pulsing seems a way better controlled now too: