Emanuel

Anthony, c'mon... And what about 5D3 ML RAW?? This has stopped anyone to shoot 5-star outcome? ;-)

Absolutely. This is really funny. But, it is what it is. The right amount of blur can solve it anyway. Without becoming too soft. With the right caveats this camera can be 'the camera'. Mike Hannon's comparison test has proved it. I also bet we need NR dialed down whatever ISO is.

Not in Pot Player though. Artifacts are practically gone if you add blur there. Not manual settings, right. Funny because it works. Trick hinted, I do bet.

See?... (almost) all is possible in the digital realm with certain steps. Still over processed to require more blur anyway. PotPlayer is your friend :-)

There are other settings beyond sharpness where over processing stands. Neither ends there. A bit all over capture devices and camera manufacturers BTW. Without mention post. That is, yet no clue of any digital camera to somehow shoot film :X other than towards the subsequent workflow...

Thanks for the information Aaron. I'm afraid the explanation can be nailed from this discussion: Even though, this may come more apparent when we raise the sensitivity. ISO 800 is too low for popping up. I guess that's there even when not noticed.

Agreed. @AaronChicago, what about NR on your capture settings? In any case, Ursa samples don't fully rule out either. A bit less, though. As already posted before, everyone can check it out by their own, Pot player does the trick for preview: Ctrl+B. No need much effort... Try it guys, your eyes can only stay grateful : ) Aka 'the GH5 playback filter' when we don't apply our homework earlier. Kidding or keeping the topic here a bit lighthearted anyways, this stuff is not so straight out the box as we can only dream for.

Either way, I've downloaded your sample and still find the need to add extra blur... :-)

LOL Funny and meaningful. But, that black sun couldn't be part of Panasonic offer :-D

Where? Acquisition? He said no. No information on NR though. Where over processing stands.

Not for its V1 though.

I stand corrected my previous calculation:

Sorry, but I wouldn't exactly second that @Zak Forsman too : ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScC8wlxGNIQ&lc=z13xttyhdpedf1md023ihv5qgoqhco4s.1494023396652296 18-35mm = 23,04 - 44,80 FF 35mm equivalent on XL (0.64x) and 25,56 - 49,70 (0.71x) on Ultra versions. :-)

What would the point be then? Well, seems obvious then, 4K is always welcome or no one would ever bother to request for someone hacking it, isn't it? ; ) Don, buy your mini-Varicam! (E :-)

That's why I don't care when people praise the big boobies as the best when not the only girls in town. No Alexa will give you the mini-Varicam can. Once again, the best camera is that one in your hands when you're able to push the trigger. Don't impress too much on some opinions you read over here. I've read a few nonsense apparently even not from the usual suspects. They just want to justify their own choices. Dictated by their own circumstances, not yours :-)

Ken, is your 14-140 the 2nd version or the f/4-5.8? @Ken Ross

LOL This line made my day browsing over here! :-) Well, that said, 4K is the new acquisition standard anyway for future proof, not exactly for delivery. Not even need to write today. There's simply no need for certain displays such as film projection, home cinema, etc. I wouldn't dare to say the same for sports, as for instance.

:-D Nah, the rate is higher : ) In any case, the camera is on her back with her walk, not good for testing evaluation, I agree.

Or Blackmagic's Pocket or Micro Cinema cameras : ) a6500 is also a very interesting device, not a lemon at all. But I'd buy a GH5 :-D

Correct. The point is when people start to freak out and tell false reports such as incompetent AF, horrid aliasing and alike. I believe that's when we can't keep silent. Silence implies consent :-)

Only shortcomings by their own. I follow your fair concern but from your knowledge I'd risk to put my bets on your liking :-) We here must praise the potentiality of the gear, to learn with its limitations. DR is a way more limited on GH5 than processing there or the stupid AF mantra. People tend to exaggerate and lose accuracy on forgetting the right spot.