Emanuel

​ There you can properly say, there's no "all of us", but "each one of us", multiple sides, even though, when apparently only two.

Well, opinions are like the famous Dirty Harry's quote... And definitely away to be science or fact, especially when we are out (go figure if we'd rather type < off > instead :-)

​True. Interests too. But, not a conflict between a couple. Or a conflict between a couple in the proper place outside the private walls when necessary: the Courts. Only public piazza can mean it. Or subplots inside the main plot of a couple relationship. And where there is more than two, it doesn't fit the number two inside anymore. As same, "the number two" stops to make sense when more angles outside the facts are added and that's not their business to even be inside them.

As I could write before in the first page of the other thread, any story has always two sides, hence two versions. So, how can anyone forget it? An opinion, any judgement requires solid information to the least detail as far as possible. Not only based on a party of the equation. That's why Courts can be not enough sometimes but they're still the best forum for. Granted their procedures in the sense to protect consensual values and the best method way to reach the goal of equity, an immeasurable truth. To listen everyone in such serious case, able to kill the reputation of a professional with a life and career made, is fully mandatory. It is a relief to all Philip's internet followers to have the chance to see him to start to react to this sad story... with facts thrown to the table. Even though painly from his private life, I believe. Worthy to be protected side by side to any other 'personality right/asset' such as those claimed by a victim of domestic abuse. Therefore his silence as his first reaction, I guess. Justice is not property of only one side. And should never be hostage of the virtual world, because there's a real world out there where fairness can trade places from a distorted narrative to serve an agenda, if so.

​ I see... a matter of terminology though, once the link is not down: http://www.eoshd.com/uploads/gh2/hack/patchvault/setf.ini.zip But, a 50KB corrupted file, actually. When just checked now.

And here, it seems still up... http://www.eoshd.com/gh2-patch-vault/ is this one just such a newer version? http://www.eoshd.com/uploads/gh2/hack/patchvault/setf.ini.zip

Don't you find it here? http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?269936-DO-NOT-POST-SEPARATE-THREADS-GH2-Hack-Questions-and-Answers-Thread Or here? http://www.personal-view.com/faqs/gh2-hack/gh2-hack-faq

- RIP http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-30582761 Coincidentally, with no key on his illness, I had been watching the video of this concert earlier today: Truly sad... : (

...97% funded (ends Tue, Sep 16 2014 22:18 PM EDT): https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1908807079/the-baldlands-feature-film-finishing-funds We crew ask for your support :-) Thanks, Emanuel

I guess life online is only part of the real XXI deal. There's no exactly B&W or there shoudn't be. I see Andrew's work as fair serious enough, though. Or you woudn't see people like me or Noah Yuan-Vogel, as for instance, posting in the same page. There's absolute zero of cruzade over here. Just a complementary attempt to give meaning to certain discussions people entertain themselves to have in such boards ;-)

hahaha True. But I think people will easily conclude by themselves to read between the lines. And a number is only a number. Like Fahrenheit or Celsius to be read from different angles and in opposite readers/sides of Atlantic. There are no magical numbers, that's part of my try to elaborate here. A GH4 can equal a Dragon (under control of certain variables), except on price :D A comparative approach based on comparative terms is what can bring some light from there.

You've 51% nailed it : ) On the leftover, I confess I can respond to your point much focused in a filmmaking forum I believe Andrew is intending to, as the filmmaker I see on his eye. And if I've always defended this corner as one of most valuable for indie filmmaking on web nowadays, it is exactly because of that. Where symbiosis between technical and aesthetical sides of the game are closer than separate realms. I salute your vibe to put the things on perspective, anyway. Cinema is made of that ;-)

No one here intends to be arrogant, I believe. And I am giving the benefit of doubt for both on the spot. Perspective, you see? That's my purpose with my entries, to put everything in perspective. If not, all this might sound rather useless if not taken in perspective and altogether. Technical aspects can be passionate, for sure. If not, why would we be here discussing it? I just think my own POV and experience out there can be useful to others who come here to read this. That said, the activity is not so diversified as it seems from the complexity itself which defines this business. I also appreciate these tests and no one is putting such in doubt. On the contrary. Again, trying to give accurate perspective in order to make them more useful, if well contextualized. E :-)

Here's a pretty fair concept: usable... ;-)

I surely read it. Reason why someone needs to introduce some common sense and real scope over such geek questions. If you are in these forums for a decade, you should have crossed yourself with my posts for sure. And also prevailing the technical aspects of business when needed, aside others (other aspects count: they must be seen altogether; that's an usual mistake). Take a look in one of my links at my signature or both. A few of you were probably in the high school, I was feeding myself from high end technology inside this industry. Trying to convince people to shoot 1080p 3:1:1 rather than 35mm film. This doesn't mean we have to lose the sense of proportion of technical aspects. That's the whole point. When we lose it, we lose any basis for our wondering. A discussion about cameras serves if balanced. If not, if we distort the blanket only for one side of the bed, we will lose the whole purpose for. E :-)

PS: I can give an example. My favorite camera is GH series, but before I was using my 5D2, out of order later on when I replaced it for a GH1. Before I had read 4/3" format was not the best for still photography... because of this misconception exactly about what photography is. No more no less in any way other as the exact acquisition device from several variables which conduct to a possible outcome. Try to go with a RED ONE to the middle of the crowd and you'll see the street photography you'll get ;) Who doesn't understand this, it can only be a good theoric sit behind the desk :)

oh God, a camera is NOT only sensor or test rates! At times, I wonder if this geek idea of a capture device has anything to be with real photography... (E :-)

LOL You love to annoy other dudes, no? ;-)

All this craziness on high ISOs comes from his legacy, among others, such as Kubrick or Storaro, of course. I guess all of them loved the 'film noir', actually, the German Expressionism to have moved to Hollywood. Also a minimal concept of light and shadow brought to the mainstream, never seen before except with the italians or french (or Cassavetes in America) three, two, one decades before. But not strictly for aesthetic reasons. To us, arrived as the 'light fimmaking' possible to conquer the world today in Sundance. Even if my mom complains the movies are too dark nowadays... : D Those were golden days when men like him changed forever the way the movies could be made. We also owe this to him. Emanuel http://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-godfather-cinematographer-gordon-willis-dies-at-82-1201185649/

Indeed, Andrew you make this camera singing (outcome counts, not a set of limitations) and who is used to defend you outside being proud now to see that's not in vain ; ) It is a truly professional amateur cinema camera, I've always believed in both talents! (E :-)

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1044728-REG/sony_ilce7s_b_alpha_a7s_mirrorless_digital.html

If you want to not bother with the audio bug at all, here you have: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/907000-REG/Panasonic_dmw_ms2_External_Stereo_Mic_For.html http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/943375-REG/panasonic_vw_vms10_stereo_microphone_plug_in.html I suggest this one to add: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/929347-REG/tascam_dr_60d_4_ch_track_linear_pcm.html "Auto tones can be added to the beginning and ending of the recording and a button can be pressed to add a slate tone to the audio at any time. These tones are also output to the 3.5mm camera out jack so they can be recorded to your DSLR camera's audio recorder for timing reference."

Actually, not 1080p but 4K this one:

*Sigh* (...) Not only based on that cool comparative with the GH3 but one of the finest GH4 reviews over there. If not of ever to committed buyers once directly addressed on the camera not exactly outcome as usual. I'll put the controversial (?) reviewer as at least here seems so in my follow-up list for sure. Without your contribution, I wouldn't notice the beardy fellow hence my thanks to both of you Michael Ma and jonpais for sharing your open-minded heads-up (E :-)