Emanuel

It's exactly my feeling on R5C : ) You need inexpensive external power to 8K60p anyway, no other hybrid camera will offer the same (you wrote "slow photo/video switching"?), go figure on this price range, DR @ R5 level fits the bill and IBIS is NOT actually the wishful thinking people dream all about. I'd rather have a builky circa 150 grams more in hands than to a fresh 2nd unit to replace my limited hot brick no dust sucker fan will carry me closer... Something I like though, brings the wallet three times lighter, impossible to complain on that one ;- )

Yup, reason why I cannot be so enthusiastic other than with the only single Canon hybrid to actually impress me: R5C ; ) The rumoured R5II to be announced soon according to the usual suspects doesn't convince me either: The same bet for RX3/RX30 series with the internal fan design. Exactly because of the introduction of decent overheating management or it's the chaos then.

Some sources mention a new AF system to be introduced...

Just coming from here: Where looks like pretty obvious why a R5C makes sense to the world, at least to me or this complex film world : ) Let alone the whole most frustrating saga signed by Canon with the R5 introduction and their overheating plot, since those 5D Mark II days... The R6 Mark II has just arrived to the shelves... so, here we go again? Canon EOS R5 Mark II Specifications (Rumored) New 61MP CMOS BSI sensor Dual DIGIC X processor 30 FPS electronic shutter with tracking / 12 FPS mechanical shutter Same 8-stop IBIS New High Resolution mode similar to pixel shift shooting found on Sony/Fujifilm 2x/4x/8x digital tele-convertor Same Dual Pixel CMOS AF II from EOS R3 and EOS R6 Mark II Internal 8K 60p video recording (8K RAW video spec to be confirmed) Internal 4K 30p/60p/120p video recording (all by oversampling) FHD 240p video recording Focus breathing correction for video New overheat prevention design similar to EOS R6 Mark II, at least 40min for 8K video, and over 60 min for 4K video Dual CFexpress type B card slot Standard HDMI port Dual USB-C port 9.44M-dot EVF New design of vari-angle LCD monitor optimized for video shooting Launch time: 2023 Q2 source

They're far to be the same method to arrive to the same outcome under much variable circumstances. What's your favorite method? Some food for thought here: OIS | DIS 2nd sample OIS on vs off vs IBIS 2nd sample ..."however neither will fall people into thinking that they're a gimble move" I believe this quote on minute 04:57 resumes the whole thing anyway... BTW, here's an interesting article to testify why for some reason R5C has no IBIS at all: https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R3-R5-R6-R7-IBIS-RUINS-footage-shot-at-wide-focal-lengths-I/td-p/379031

Thank you! Such "torture" test as you've called it : D has shown to declare some truth from very of its own... The locations and lit vs shadow areas picked by you follow the whole thing : ) However, I'd still be eager to find the same location(s) (because not every locations and light + dark/shadow circumstances challenge the capture device in the same way) and the noise obviously under different ISOs... from one end to another. Don't want to bug you with, if you'll be willing to offer though, that would be rather useful to everyone looking for buying the camera. Much appreciated, - EAG :- )

Your bet and love? I am still speechless but obviously proud, after an impressive 6-1 victory by my native country Portugal over Switzerland last night, going towards the quarter-finals then now... Oh well, perhaps the price to pay when we had (not only) Cristiano Ronaldo or the Italian Serie A best player Rafael Leão as backups?! The world's top right-back (but also capable of playing either as a full-back or a wing-back on the right or yet left-back) Man City's João Cancelo didn't even have to leave the bench this time... https://www.foxsports.com/watch/play-612ab9b5a001519 HERE the highlights with no comments : ) Go Portugal, go! < 3

To those who still complain on lack of IBIS... Here is a test made without it on the inexpensive RF 24mm f/1.8. It's not the R5C but just for the sake of it shows how it does the job done though, eventually more suitable than any wobble/jerky artifacts for poor handheld work anyway.

Yet on the above-posted concern and @TomTheDP accurate response ofc, still wondering about the performance of this capture device, also actually noticed by @angang and as for instance here: So: Can you @markr041 or any other FX30 user out there, give it a try on low light under distinct ISOs for 4K 120fps? How noisy the MFT wide crop ends to be?

Retweeted by our webmaster : ) Lovely... Fuji GX680, Ilford FP4. Nice to follow routes to achieve this going on our current digital capture devices ; )

Thanks : ) And what about the RØDE Wireless Go II?

Thank you... And what about their audio wireless?

https://www.hollyland-tech.com/

Very frankly, I guess they are more or less the same today : ) Ah aside Sony's AF and multiple choices on GH series.

No, not at all! : ) Thanks for asking, wondering about the same!

Pleasant pictures out there : ) I guess it may fit when not under more demanding focus challenge? Or depending on the lenses used by you? What exactly lenses have performed fine for such results you've noticed?

Pity no 4:2:2 on 10-bit above 30p for GH5 II...

Continuous tracking face/eye focus? On video? This guy is not happy with his XH2 performance for stills work:

Some sources out there say: "It looks like Panasonic and DJI are jointly testing a new focusing method. The new system is said to utilize the LiDAR focus technology released with the Ronin 4D. If this technology can be introduced to Panasonic’s mirrorless camera, we can expect a significant improvement in video shooting. It is currently undergoing in-house testing and will be available in the near future." source When?! source Something that I really don't understand is why 40 years ago (!) we already had this... coupled with an external U-Matic, Beta or VHS recorder would allow autofocus by then ; ) From a main Brazilian newspaper ("Technology SHARP | yesterday for a few | today for millions") in 1983 But Fujifilm... isn't it PDAF based? source

I told you, I didn't want to believe that from yours, so all OK : ) But serves to those who may read you and think otherwise : D Much nonsense a pissing contest between camera brands with people trying to piss farther than "the other side"... LOL Oh boy, after all we share the same opinion ; ) With the exception that for first time in 30 years I cannot ignore them anymore as no less investment this occasion. GH6 purchase would be a good excuse to still stay away from Sony or delay it at least. Well, I am in trouble though, if Amazon or Panasonic will reach me to accept my rant anyway! haha

Back to topic, we've arrived to the point no device will serve of any use in any way other as based on the shooter skills.

How have you found this combo's outcome with the same lens and aperture above ISO 2500?

I still want to believe is merely wondering, conveyed by interrogation mark(s) : D

This doesn't make any sense, are you talking to whom exactly now? Is someone else's dick bigger than anyone else? I don't take you as a believer, I guess not : ) You mean, thinking out loud? Of course, to praise this or that benefit about some brand doesn't diminish some other. What distinguishes the attitude (applies for professional career too) is not the brand you acquire but for sure, much more the fact you won't dress this or that shirt just because you've purchased from them. No idea how many years any or everyone here is spending their own money on gear but I know how many years I've been placing mine. Yes, as repeatedly witten, Panasonic is among them and not little when you stop to count when reaches the number of 11 or 12 camera units... How many times do I have to write it more and more? Phew. NOBODY here or anywhere else should be refrained of any criticism addressed to any brand by unqualified fan love about a camera trademark. No track plays at all. Got it. Now replying to you directly on your invective(s) (one by one) -- that was only a preamble generally speaking... LOL I am not looking specifically for a Sony. FYI I am used to OWN (and USE) cameras of many manufacturers, so this purchase of a couple of units is only one plus. The fact I am buying a new system based on a new mount system won't stop me to keep some other mount options JFYI. But yes, I could have invested on more gear from the same camera supplier than adding a new lineup, that's correct. The point is not for a set of specs. There's another pipe to consider beyond, for making business. Hence the case. I only said that nothing is wrong with Sony in response to your comment. This should not trigger such reaction or maybe just rhetorical? ; ) No topic justifies that, no thread subject, etc.. Said "insistent"?... Really? Who or what actually? The one who claims against some unacceptable business practices not in favour of any customer from the supply side BTW, is that so? Did we understand it quite well? Or some discomfort only because someone else has some criticism to address to a sacred cow? I don't believe I'm reading it from you : ) No worries, buyer's remorse is always in good shape when we got a good deal. Something you did and I even praised your luck. This doesn't necessarily mean they behave accordingly with everyone. That's all about that, so let's the world coexist outside. And please, also some perspective as fair add-on. Better to be silent where fits to be, not trying to gag whoever else when happens to tell (but could be to think) in a dissonant way. Simple. Never feed the discussion if we don't stand to listen to. This is nothing about my team against yours. No more words needed to infer how much nonsense sounds to be if so. Let's get the right scope or too much distraction over there.

Yes, I've called them twice. A couple of days ago and today again. In the digital age, yes. This is not the first occasion I call Amazon and never had a single problem with Amazon customer service before. On the contrary, I've always been treated accordingly by them. Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's. People blame Amazon, but this is a Panasonic store inside their shopping system. No idea what comes next but they told me they would contact me in 24 hours. Well, for now, they accept they concur that's not client's fault as I heard now from their call center. The customer is deemed to have fulfilled the sale conditions when placing the order. Now let's wait and see. Nothing wrong on Sony's IBIS and colour, neither with their prices at least which look like as solid as their camera bodies. Panasonic sales department doesn't look like to follow the rule this time ; )