Emanuel

You can always add an EF to RF mount speedbooster adapter and work FF from there avoiding overheating issue @ 5.1K resolution. This information has already been advised before in this post and successive ones a dozen pages back along this same thread:

You said it perfectly well, pal, exactly my standpoint : ) Here's some real world user report published today: source Also lovely imagerie available on that link : -)

Nonsense... you don't even read my posts or you wouldn't put me in the same line of any fanboys to praise whatever brand you dislike. How can you comment them then, humm?? : D I am a regular poster on EOSHD since the early beginning, for almost a decade now. What about you? Since last month of July...?? :- D It's absolutely laughable you infer I am here ignoring this issue or praising them when their commitment clearly doesn't match mine! WOW It's not difficult to follow the position or experience of someone but for that, you need to read them first. ; ) Last but not least, how old are you? Or you'll omit my question as much as when you mentioned engineer skills as the quality to be entitled to trust Tilta products and I asked about yours? No pun intended. And you're still lacking any answer to add up there... ; )) Nonetheless, maybe you know more on basic laws of thermal dynamics than them from Tilta? ;- ] Something completely disgusting is trading places to distort the facts or take the world B&W, bashing people or brands at the distance of a keyboard hidden behind a mouse and an anonymous alias and yet, pretending to believe only one side can offer criticism when it is much easier to see it from eventual adopters/buyers rather than naysayers. Not you, for sure. But it was not me either to call for credentials or bringing academic degrees to the equation. Even before they had released it?! What the hell a solid accessories supplier such as Tilta would think about all that? Or their customers? Or do I risk to be insulted and the usual mantra to call me their fanboy? LOL The same follows for the Canon patent. Welcome that tip on the HEPA filter. That's an example of constructive criticism. Let's not confound the fair criticism all of us are entitled to (especially Canon customers, oh yes) with haters. We are what we do, words mean too little. This applies to everyone, not this or that user per se. Filmmakers are used to positively search for solutions, not problems. That's also what basically tells about their experience in less or greater degree.

When their craft feed their families, some features can be night or day in order to succeed ;- ]

I second Chris' words but I must also praise such outcome, thanks for sharing : ) Lovely colours, a charm... kudos to both gear and a special mention to the talent behind the camera :- ) Shame they didn't add 4K 60p or I had adopted one then, pity they didn't. Great AF performance/system BTW.

Both shot on Mi 10 Pro. Here's more from mobile photography (same Xiaomi tag but could be some other): source

If we will say they've succeeded to cripple their hardware without proper heat dissipation design, can we properly stand it then? LOL ;- )

I support myself and my craft and who helps me to pay the bills. Read @BTM_Pix posts before you still support whatever point you've decided so... PS: Ah you've finally decided then... Funny you agree with him! You remind me politicians, you'd surely succeed to be one! : D

I am also puzzled about that as matter of fact. And curious. First question I had... How do they manage dust? The fact our most reputable engineer among us and BTW my supplier too @BTM_Pix : ) did not drop a single word on topic speaks fairly enough to me ;- )

I understand and fully share your concern. But: I just don't like to see anonymous aliases to amuse themselves to bash Canon. This is not helpful. One thing is fair criticism, the other one is without previous experience with a tool starting to guess about it. If I'd have a crystal ball I'd be billionaire. I am not engineer but I can fairly guess Tilta has high qualified engineers to design their products. They are a trustful provider. If they announce something, I'd delude myself if I would listen naysayers rather than people who help my craft. Moreover, no one is expecting a miraculous solution. This is not all about that. And I see people without the necessary filmmaking experience in certain styles/segments of our craft to negatively/improperly infer this R5/R6 or this or that workaround won't work out. WOW Without ever testing it! This naysayerism is absolutely inaccurate and counterproductive.

I am a filmmaker, not engineer. You? Tilta has proven to offer good quality service BTW... Filmmakers trust on their suppliers.

I am bald : D I just see a lot of posters without necessary practical experience in the filmmaking... Gosh People in the field ARE used to get COMPETENT workarounds virtually in a whole daily basis :- ) This is part of the craft... This capture device can be very helpful if certain adaptations will be proved to be efficiently adopted. This is not B&W : ) It only depends on goodwill the brand has shown to fail once again for obvious business reasons; ...and talent to positively look for way outs. Not the customary yadda yadda between fanboys and bashers. Phew.

This can be a useful specialised tool, not a workhorse, with: 1) https://tilta.com/2020/07/tiltaing-camera-cage-for-canon-r5/ 2) https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/canon-designs-additional-adapter-to-fix-canon-eos-r5-overheating-issue-1705356-2020-07-28 3) Update to lift up their firmware limitations.

There are workarounds at the hardware level, they can implement though ;- ) About the time to wait for having the camera back to full capabilities back shorter than 6+ hour long? This can be fixed by firmware.

No, it's not like that : ) Take a look on that video report already posted in this thread twice! Nothing about the overheating now. Of course, this is related to hardware, design and lack of heat dissipation. It's all about the firmware on their imposed limitations and time to give full capabilities back. 6+ hours long !! Are they kidding us?? @herein2020 you beat me for a couple of minutes! ;- )

Seems crippled by the firmware in order to protect their high-end, so let's be optimistic they will stop to be jerks and give us what the technology is able for to begin with. This cat-mouse game does NOT dignify the brand. As good customer of theirs (aside cameras, we are currently using a C500 in a feature film + three short films to be shot in Santander, Spain and I still have 2x units of a large format printer as workhorses, let alone another half-dozen of Canon units around), I expect a change.

Already posted a few pages back. If they won't address it, they're shooting their own feet. It doesn't make ANY sense. It is even plain ridiculous. And it is not noble for the brand. They could have fixed, they candidly didn't want it. It doesn't matter how loyal we are to or dislike Canon, it is simply true.

I am not a loner cowboy. Last time I checked the film crews I've participated we had created a few dozens I've produced, among other stuff where I try my best. If you'll follow my signature or even my posts, you'll find what you're looking for. I see where you're coming from but you ask without any business card? This is a random triple portion of mine: Where are yours BTW?

It doesn't mean you don't have a point you actually have. They still cripple it anyway. Overheating is there for purpose. They didn't want to write a different plot. Their effort, if any, is far to be enough.

Nah, there are obviously limits they impose either at zero care for proper heat dissipation or not letting the full camera capability extend it to their own boundaries. Go a few posts back in this same page and follow the video report I posted (for some reason I did it), before to start inferring anything.

They kill their own sales.

Well, there's a difference between low light and no light... ; ) Nothing we can't handle with fast glass and modern sensors, even going along a small size such as MFT is : ) I've handled live music concerts very well, though, I don't feel need much else further. I am a nocturnal shooter anyway. Ten years ago I was already taking the smaller format factor of a GH1 on behalf of my 5DII, even for stills any time. Night shots. Good fast glass is your friend and makes the whole trick. Without mention a slower shutter speed option route when needed but that's also because fits the shooting style of my bill. Different strokes for different folks. Marketing is a bit slow to catch me yet :- D

Indeed, I believe a workaround is anyhow inevitable. It doesn't make any sense, otherwise.

I never go above ISO 3200 on my P4K with two stops of difference in-between, go figure! :- D

LOL This is a real user's experience from real world... :- )