Emanuel

Question made and coming from here: Here's a workaround for Skydio 2 night footage: Disclaimer provided by the brand itself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zm8sZoIseTc&lc=UgxPi6AiqlZoMdghykd4AaABAg Still valid and worthy to try IMHO : -)

Both P4K & P6K are practically the same with a difference for resolution, lens mount and acquisition price. It ends a bit pointless to discuss it or dismiss any one of those. They simply have no competition, end of story IMO : ) Waiting for P8K FF here if ever because P6K replaces it pretty well as hybrid tool.

Old glass can effectively surprise the most indefectible dude for cheap. There are so many gems out there... ; -)

I still have three GH1 with us and never will sell them exactly for same reason, Márcio : ) Abraço (E : -)

You're welcome, pal : ) Thanks for your heads-up and to @Kisaha as well on his most recent YT entry (LOL my brother, you have no idea of my open smile now when I've just typed it) on Autel's bird issues report, so here's my best bet then: People say it cannot fly by night (I might wonder only on autonomous mode, no?), so no idea on any workaround to overcome it if so.

Nothing about him in particular for sure but everyone in general : ) Anonymous ID is a mere trace of the early Internet. We live a digital life nowadays in a hyperlinked world. Reticence is steadily a right of any one of us but can struggle with transparency or an open world intimately connected with an open-source letter of principles in a trustworthy environment, always welcome and mandatory in a professional realm. Reciprocity applies as well. As already written up there, it's a pity to have no place for endowing certain connections made here in a daily basis, as we usual suspects over our own communication among each other, and developing them even farther. Sounds to me a Pyrrhic victory more often than it should be IMHO. Series of opportunities proper of a healthy industry platform as these boards can be but unnamed so lost then. Hence my customary comment for the subject matter : ) No name chats don't break my heart, well, at least to me. Love the History (hard to be told without appointed characters) BTW if this can help to clear up the whole thing and the core of my point : -)

I know @Kisaha, your prudent approach as buyer is a breeze over this forum and a good advice especially for newbies : ) We need to calculate very well where we put our expenses for sure. Wise traditional caution never hurt anyone. When I incentive you to see some of your work or to drop the anonymous status it is not as personal attack I also hate but actually because you've produced this healthy interest on me towards you as professional of same craft. A bit as much as with Andrew's inputs. I praise his footage subforum he has opened for us but seems few people care about... On the other hand, I am a research dude and very Deleuzian, some other of my specialties : D I find YT or any other resource to stimulate a rhizomatic course of same or another kind. I'm afraid to be symptomatically misunderstood here anyway... As for instance that Andrew's thread (it was there, nothing about the usual humble tone of your posts), not my mantra as many others have adhered but as he himself wrote there, it's just a matter to see it as a different opinion. E : -)

I'd rather know who we're talking to. In the reality, anonymous IDs have no place there. Why here? Especially with a frequent and valuable user like you? Without mention the lack of reciprocity I invariably tend to avoid as much as possible. In any case, you're used to talk about your craft (isn't it one of the reasons for the existence of a forum like this one we share?), very welcome here for everyone (me included) so you're not the example of an anonymous individual per se. In your behalf. That's a positive remark. You've recently taken my posts addressed to you too serious. I don't see you exactly as a 'DJI troll', c'mon, I was kidding with you : ) Even though, in my country, we're used to say if we don't want to be a wolf, we cannot take the wolf's skin for us ; ) There was another point behind my invective though. I guess we're used to please each other's posts except more lately when I noticed you decided to be nasty through the grapevine. I believe you know very well when and where, so I think we have no need to come back now there. No, I didn't buy a drone yet. Something we two have in common, we need to justify any purchase. It simply hasn't happened. It will for sure. So, still in the market looking for. However, I always tend to celebrate the feat even when not directly connected with me as user or my personal choice. My posts are there to testify that. Last but not least, Internet communication is a bit different, so I'd dare to say we both would praise a friendly meeting out there in the real world. Bet on that : -) - Emanuel

No one needs glass will resolve more pixels to take advantage from them, being image acquisition a combo, got it? : -)

Yes, they are. Not everyone but a few of them. That one, as for instance, was used to irritate me a bit when began to pop up in the recent past. I've gradually accepted the fact we had to resign ourselves to the fact the annoying ads are moving from TV set to our personal display today. In any case, we had the need to convince networks before in order to reach our public. We have our audiences at the distance of our talent to create and feed them nowadays. Even international ones. That's a major trump card. First time ever. A dream for the indie world. To live from subventions is as short as an arthouse film budget stretching to pay extra film festival fees ; ) Without mention you have to kiss some other mainstream arses in the business or craft (as we'd say in Portuguese) when not in politics to keep yourself alive and kickin'... Is this creative freedom? What's the best? : X Cumps, - E.

G7 is the best bang for the buck ever in that price range. I have four of them, still rolling : -)

It would be interesting to care about a comparative against the S1H: - and check how the latter justifies the premium to pay from the outcome; - and as farther is able to excel it? I and many others would tend to bet, I guess. Or not as much expected? https://***URL removed***/articles/2491201838/do-i-need-the-panasonic-s1h-or-is-the-s1-with-log-upgrade-just-as-good https://wolfcrow.com/panasonic-s1h-vs-panasonic-s1-which-is-the-better-investment-for-video/ Still wondering about, no less versus against their MFT line and the GH6 to come for a fraction of the price.

Yeah, same guys with many other countries also covered : ) I meant a few other birds... Once YT seems to be so popular among us, I meant to see from a distinct origin over these boards ; ) as that particular footage used to be posted by @OliKMIA one of the fewest if not the only one to do it here : -)

It is in Portuguese language but you can follow going along the subs tool this single piece of information, one of the most transparent ones I've ever seen on topic, showing the way YT rewards YouTubers to cross and vary in many regions of the world according to where your audience is and respective different exploitation rates:

WTH lack of love for that, c'mon, and yes, DR is nothing but just another tool, no more no less. They can surely offer much good looking outcome, for Christ's sake, take a look on these recent entries from your contest... Other than aliasing when not under control or a bit of moiré for water shots -- horses for courses... are they bad by any chance? : ) That Hills Green piece made my wish to watch the whole thing BTW : -)

Your stuff is one of the best aerial footage we can actually find on web or anywhere -- here are the links to the subforum Andrew created for us and where this thread misplaced here by my fault : ) should actually be located as well: By my mistake too, I also re-posted some other video already linked before when it should be this experience of 3 hours and 40 minutes (yeah, you read it well : D) here made in the beautiful Croatian landscapes: There's also this series of portraits by air and country I have no idea if you've ever noticed (aired on National Geographic): https://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/tv/china-from-above/episodes.aspx https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_From_Above https://www.natgeotv.com/za/shows/natgeo/europe-from-above https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/ondemand/program/video/japanfromabove/ And powerful shots don't necessarily mean to be captured in motion, so here is a marvelous row of those: https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/photography/2018/12/le-monde-vu-du-ciel-avec-jassen-torodov This planet is plenty of different locations to give to the world to see and business opportunities from networks for local shooters... I imagine the beautiful Greece as for instance ; -)

It is : ) Yet on that Log vs HDR discussion up there, I had noticed some other video I ended to post another one by mistake IIRC. I can't find it right now... well, maybe not available for public disclosure anymore. Now only log related (pops up decontextualized three months later). Anyways, here's the link to the user's YT webpage: https://www.youtube.com/user/myownworldlive/videos Where it's possible to follow a few more recent HDR tests, though. I find the dusk footage performance pretty useful BTW for "pro" : D use included ; -)

How come? That's a milestone, changed the whole perception (well, I did it a few years earlier but that's another story) and is part of the success of this forum as well : -) https://www.eoshd.com/creative-filmmaking/zacuto-revenge-shootout-part-2-results-revealed-francis-ford-coppola-and-audience-majority-give-win-to-gh2/

Man, don't put me trying to read those funny Greek characters or you'll drive me, and I bet everyone here other than you, more nuts than your hate towards things you won't buy... LOL : -)

To the rest who don't give a damn for kids trying to play the adult game and have the pro label right into the business card, can we enjoy some imagerie by Autel without risk to meet DJI trolls in disguise of nasty boys? LOL : -) More here by user fotofletch on Flickr Hope their new 1-inch 6K Autel Evo 2 (full pixel readout, no line skipping, no pixel binning) may bring this out from stills realm closer to video.

You've misunderstood me, but I don't. Your bias is not only towards against the bird you don't plan to buy. You're just repeating your nasty ad hominem attack done a few weeks ago when Andrew opened that thread. All flew peacefully and friendly -- different HONEST opinions should never hurt, except your entry there. Pay attention to the dates, knight. Isn't this request of yours nonsensically outdated? Once again...? Today? What's the purpose of that, dude? FYI I have here with me right now another member of these boards reading you and wondering about the same as me. Bet safely. The whole point is that you tend to forget your convenience, interest, goal, whatever, serves your agenda, not someone's else plans. Different strokes for different folks. Ah and on YT mantra, better to blame Google, no? Or I am the one you want to target instead, humm? : P You're not even the owner of this forum. Let him to speak by his own when he feels it fits. So let it be written, so let it be done. An opinion maker is as more effective as is able to accept an opposite side and respect it. A matter of opinion, I recall to have read such word written there by our webmaster. Let's be fair. Your hitchhiking here now instead is even funny to say the least. WOW what a love to beat another dead horse of yours you won't buy...? haha Boring quarantine? Sick. To listen some other people's interaction with us and be grateful for that is a proof of civil attitude. No app in the world will replace it. You're still entitled to let it as your entry in your new ignore list anyway : D Why the fuss, after all? What bothers you? : X I personally (proper way to spell it, right? ; ) dislike these anonymous aliases BTW. We never know who we're talking to. People can be anything they want, just not what they don't have guts to say face to face, in the real world. Not hidden and kept apart from a valid ID, not typed from a distant keyboard where every single input looks like recklessly possible. There's a word for such ignoble route option I'll omit to type here now. Seems pretty clear I intend to chill out more than you. Won't this grant me beyond a 12-year old group more than you? LOL

What kind of pro work? Your pro work? Even though, I have no idea what kind of pro work yours is, I can't properly guess what you're talking about because you've never posted here a single piece or example I had noticed, I remind you there are much distinct levels or different kind of "pro" work, so hard to stand such bold statement, isn't it? As Tom @thebrothersthre3 has fairly nailed it (and wrote above), you're just evaluating the feature for the pudding. That's not the point. If you think HDR is negligible, I can only find you pretend to skip it and believe there's nothing new to see there because fits your convenience of some investment recently made. I understand your position, no worries : ) Your viewpoint seems to me mere bias though. You want to ignore what a pure business plan of your own doesn't include to afford.

None of those are HDR related. Neither blame the capture device for that ; ) Did I answer you above? HDR is a game changer whether there's buyer's remorse from any of the recent purchases of yours or not.

Oh, did it bring some damage?! "We apologize for any inconvenience caused..." LOL : ) That said, that Viltrox 85mm f/1.8 is a gem anyway : -)