Emanuel

@andrgl, thanks for the heads up! LOL
You made my Saturday night a way bit more funny, Lintelfilm! :-)

I'm still finding central area focusing works the best. That central area can also be moved anywhere you like. I found it impossible to watch that 45 minute video from Peter. This info could have been distilled down to 5-10 minutes. 
I also don't understand why he thinks 225 points 'has the most power' as he said in a previous video. What good is the 225 points when the camera decides where it wants to focus in that mode?
He means well, he's harmless, but dang, he sure likes to hear himself talk.

Here's another one pretty interesting to my book:
 

1) I like this one here -- no other camera does this at this resolution (4K/60p) for the price:
@Neumann Films, Good one, Luke!
2)
Can't have access.

Now changing subject, here's some marvelous imagerie from this piece of work:
Shot on 12-60mm f2.8-4 and 100-400mm f4-6.3 -- only two zoom lenses and here we all can go very light ;-)
 

Now changing subject, here's some marvelous imagerie from this piece of work:
Shot on 12-60mm f2.8-4 and 100-400mm f4-6.3 -- only two zoom lenses and here we all can go very light ;-)
 

Just checked Whois - www.craftcamera.com is registered to: E.Saawadi, Mansoura, Egypt
Yep, I'm just kidding.

One of my fav lens setups...
With 12-35mm f/2.8-4 mk II here:
 

I like them. And the a6500 has the best color of any Sony i've used. Still, the color of the GH5 really knocks me out--standard and natural are both great and so easy to make them look beautiful in post. I love my Canon cams, but if the AF of the GH5 were solid I think I'd use it on talking head presentations. I think it rivals Canon color out of the cam--different but beautiful. 
 

Yes, indeed... : D
Without mention it seems to offer better AF when recorded externally.

Hi,
There is a thread on Personal-view that has introduced a free set of input and output 3D LUTs to make video files respond to color correction like they were shot in RAW.
These are free and available at http://www.logarist.com
The video below explains how to configure your video editing software (in my case Resolve) so that exposure compensation, contrast and white balance (via offset) behave like they are working on a RAW video files.
I tested it on files from my Sony A7RII with shot with the Still color setting and Cine1 gamma (as recommended on Logarist.com) and it worked great. I tried the same CC settings without the input and out LUTs and it still looked ok, but not as good, especially when there were any exposure changes. Besides looking better after color correction, the process of color correction was easy to get great results quickly.
If you are looking for great color with 8-bit video files from your Sony cameras, I highly recommend you try it!
Mark

Well at least we know for sure they gave it a lot of settings.

Well we all know it is Way to early on tests to show weather the GH5 is "normal" GH4 AF or they did make a real improvement.

Likely, what you say is true... the answer is "it depends."    On the subject, conditions, skill of videographer, etc.      But this implies that when reviewing complex equipment used in a specific and limited  way (the "test"),  one should not be too confident in your own results, and should certainly not use melodramatic language like "it sucks."    How can anyone take this kind of comment seriously?
Now there appear to be other individuals on youtube supporting the "it sucks" position even though they don't even own the camera and haven't done any testing.   That's really foolish.
 

Well, Panasonic will say: At least it's free of noise, lol

One of the most interesting low light GH5 samples seen these days was shot through a 20 bucks 'plastic lens':
 
Reason why I had the need to open this protest here:
 

More footage:
 

Well, maybe we need to save the grace going on with some filter in the front of the camera in order to put it soft, I guess. Apart, work @post.

But, you've made it with your GH4... BTW, you should be hired for Lumix Luminary instead.

I'm sorry guys for my non-native English! : D Trust me, even in Portuguese, my writing (just trying to go after my thoughts) is not so straightforward, as I'd like and it should be variably assigned. In English, much more labyrinthic, I believe. At times, it is per style such as subliminal speech to be read between-the-lines indeed. This happens especially with people like you I am used to read in a frequent basis.
My bad I fail to leave it with you when happens. You are not the first ones nor the last ones to notice, I guess. I love complex stuff, true. I bet that's the reason why GH5 AF system attracts me enough to advocate myself in Panasonic's behalf... LOL
Take a look in the messages I left there. Maybe they can help to follow my thinking on topic, I think so :-)
BTW, thanks for your care and earlier compliments too!
E :-)
 

 

I believe in his honest efforts to begin with. But, his perspective is flawed now. To criticize the GH5 manual disclaimer, some other example, doesn't help at all, only can confirm it. He's trying his best only to stay reliable on the picture. Unless he had a malfunctioning unit to test with (which I doubt), your testing shows there's something going wrong with the methodology of his tests. To me, he had to even be more complete than he was. GH5 AF system is complex enough to require the customization of distinct scenarios.
Still hoping he will come to understand and stand corrected it.

Oh by my goodness, what did I write you had disliked? (I've just done a little edit up there)
That's non sense. We need to be able to stand any discussion when polite. I won't second you, though. I'll still be able to follow and like your posts when you make it happen. I'll miss your usual likes anyway. Pity you're unable to be reciprocal for such matter ;-)
 
YT mediocrity rules over our heads.

Well I fail to see how EP was attacking maxies integ with the comment you ignored him on. Anyway, it's pretty clear, the GH5 af is best on single area. And it doesn't behave like the rx100v at all in the other settings. I thought it would be better. Everyone can probably move on though until Pana do an update. ALthougH... maybe I should do an AF video....