Orangenz

SuggestionofMotion on facebook is investigating some of those sort of things atm.

Yes, same here for the last 3 years. Clipping occurs at 100% so easy to avoid with zebras at that setting. A good starting off point. The GH4 in particular was very noisy in the shadows so lifting as high as possible without clipping was invariably the way to go. But as they say, you pays your money and makes your choice. Horses and water and all that stuff.

wooden camera?

So when do you white balance to the white panel on the left? Isn't that first?

I'm pretty sure the word is telepathetic. It looks to me like a really nice base to add luts and looks to. Or maybe after the colour royale thing.

60% Vision 6 for this. Winter morning rugby. AWD is probably easier with less crazy colours around outside. This is the first picture, white balance to card, then leeming cineD lut added. It brightens it a lot. Wonder what the colour checker thing would do now.

I can just see you walking around ripping your dark shirt open every so often to white balance off the white one. Hmmm, that guy.

Was just wondering what it would look like white balanced straight off the card from the first cineD pic.

I think Andrew has said in his own lut material that AWB on the panasonics is good. And not so much for Sony. Last piccy is rully rully nice The normal practise for Sony cameras I'm afraid.

3rd piccy missing?

Theoretically people can't clap their hands and yet in practise most of us can. How is it possible to see things when I open my eyes? I don't know! But BOOM there the world is. The LUT is a tool and many people have found it useful. That's all. It's not like it's homeopathy or something.

Does your lens have a MF switch?

Some lovely 4k 50p Atomos material here

Well your point about everything being dark and radioactive makes it sound like u little crazy lol. Shoot some cine-d, follow the shooting and setup instructions, take some tif frame exports, post them here.

I really like the colour from Natural, but I think it is for low contrast situations and has less dynamic range and lower saturation than other profiles. Reduced luminance will make high contrast situations worse for natural. Master Pedestal is for matching different cameras. Changing it will also reduce your available dynamic range. Reducing saturation in natural profile is not ideal. As @hyalinejim suggests the Leeming Lut One for Cine-D gives you a starting point for any grade or tweaks that is really solid. It also fixes the black and shadow areas without touching the masterped. Three questions would be how do you do white balance (auto is ok) are you using a calibrated monitor - eg. spyder5 and how do you play back files (in browser, vlc, other players) and if you take a tiff frame export from your timeline does it look the same as what you see in the video viewers.

Yup. Either use the tool to rewrap (not transcode) or just set camera to reduced luminance values. The codec edits fine for me in premiere on pc.

10 bit GH5 is very handy for the greenscreen. Pana 25mm 1.7 is very good (there's a 1.4 version that's a bit pricier), as is the 42.5 1.7 that Jon mentioned. Samyang sometimes sell as Rokinon.

First half of what video? I made extensive comments on a video where he tried to show simple colour banding in a scene with no simple colours. So again, vlog 8bit = bad (banding, magenta blobs), vlog 10bit = good (beautiful). If you get banding and other problems with your 8 bit footage then 10bit can fix it. If you don't get banding and other problems with your 8 bit scene then how is 10 bit going to fix it? Are you working without vlog atm? Let's be honest here, in some ways the GH5 is as good as a RED. Basic IQ is one. This isn't an iphone we're talking about here. DR, ease of codec use (a standard since forever), intraframe - that's why people spend the big bucks.

Better motion cadence will be relevant to the intraframe codec.

If you think everything is just an opinion then don't bother making one yourself. If you say that I'm wrong then give evidence to counter my evidence. I'm interested in truth and WC plainly ignores it and he didn't use math. People can have opinions but they need to be based on facts and a good experimental process that accurately describes and tests reality. "He has posted other stuff" is not an argument.

Sorry if I'm not recognising sarcasm here or not, but Wolfcrow clearly doesn't know stuff at all. He essentially just made stuff up. His testing is on the level of shooting a crinkly sheet in the dark and some smooth talking rubbish over the top. And some of his most vocal proponents on youtube are, strangely enough, 0 video/ 0 subscriber accounts but with massive playlists. This complaint about compression limiting the quality is nuts when you can intercut with red without any difference showing and doesn't show an understanding of the codec itself. The MLessons comparison with 6500 video is also enough.

No, I mean the store opinion of the Lexar cards, that I was passing along. If someone wants to buy me an NZ$800 panasonic card they are more than welcome!

The local store sells Lexar and Sandisk (and those lovely Panasonic ones I took a picture of). Their main gripe is their very slow min write speed and recommend against them for 4k recording or in Sony cameras at all. Bit of a "I said they said" kind of post from me sorry

I bit the bullet and tried that one. I also made use of the 150% speed function.

Good looking is not the same as good job. No I'm not going to watch it. His previous video trying to compare 8 to 10bit was not good. My comments on that one: