-
Posts
782 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by Tito Ferradans
-
Tokina +0.5 72mm http://www.ebay.com/itm/271232134636 http://www.ebay.com/itm/271232131830 Tamron +0.5 72mm http://www.ebay.com/itm/271232140021
-
yep, primes are the best. :P
-
Zooms tend to look bad with anamorphics. Rotating front zooms are even worse, and modern lenses don't go well either.
-
No no, a Helios should do just fine. On the 5D3, you need 85mm to avoid vignette, but ~60mm should suffice for APS-C.
-
most important thing of all: which camera are you using?
-
I believe that when he says Iscorama he means this thing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iscorama Which is the "anamorphic holy grail" so far, and WAS produced by ISCO.
-
Advice on eBay anamorphic lens listing (No advertising)
Tito Ferradans replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
And how that works, Tony? About focusing, and image quality, etc etc -
Advice on eBay anamorphic lens listing (No advertising)
Tito Ferradans replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Wow, maybe it's something like the Video Attachment I, but smaller? It went pretty cheap... -
I just modified my Iscorama 36 for close focus
Tito Ferradans replied to richg101's topic in Cameras
Since I was already gonna ask a few questions to the guys at Van Dieme, I also asked about the 54. They said they're working on the design, but it might take a while. I'm not interested in rehousing the 54 (yet), for the reasons mentioned above, by Bioskop. -
Stills from my Anamorphic shoot this evening
Tito Ferradans replied to Caleb Genheimer's topic in Cameras
this is my current thought, since downscaling something makes it look better than upscaling.- 11 replies
-
- GH2
- Moon Trial 5
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
Stills from my Anamorphic shoot this evening
Tito Ferradans replied to Caleb Genheimer's topic in Cameras
Well, I squeeze it too, since no webplayer supports anything larger than 1080p resolution. :)- 11 replies
-
- GH2
- Moon Trial 5
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
LA7200 gives blurry edges with 5dm2 on 24-105 lens
Tito Ferradans replied to neoclass's topic in Cameras
I gotta get back my 0.25 diopter to test this! Along the last year I've read multiple times that diopters between the anamorphic and taking lens would not work properly... I just got confused about maximum focusing distance (maybe I missed a line or so of what he said). It's limited within the diopter range, right? ps - the LA7200 also performs very well combined with Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 -
I was going to say the same, but elubes got here first. It's only challenging when the lens doesn't flare much.
-
I just modified my Iscorama 36 for close focus
Tito Ferradans replied to richg101's topic in Cameras
It totally rehouses the isco, in a metal body, with follow focus gears, and closer focusing without the front element popping out. :) -
I just modified my Iscorama 36 for close focus
Tito Ferradans replied to richg101's topic in Cameras
I'm gathering funds - and guts - to ship it there too. Can you PM me with some more information about time required for the rehousing, and costs? :) -
Angenieux Series 9 Kit (+1 to +4) http://www.ebay.com/itm/300921405699
-
LA7200 gives blurry edges with 5dm2 on 24-105 lens
Tito Ferradans replied to neoclass's topic in Cameras
Hahahaha, good point. I like it the way it is, I just think it can be improved (like almost anything else, even Iscos). And not so much "double focus" on the rehousing, but more of a "variable focus through" where the focus range isn't so limited without the diopters, nor so picky like a regular double focus lens. According to tests, you can 'set' the Panny to focus from X to Y meters, and rack focus only with the taking lens. :P -
LA7200 gives blurry edges with 5dm2 on 24-105 lens
Tito Ferradans replied to neoclass's topic in Cameras
Am I the only person here who likes this lens? I'd choose it over a double focus system 95% of the time! (of course, with diopters) -
Hey Erik! Kowas and Sankors are particularly famous for their vignetting when light sources are pointed directly inside it, because the inner parts of the body reflect the light and end up showing in the frame. (please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading about this on another thread, and getting results from personal testing)
-
Errr.... weirdest tutorial ever. Technically, according to it, you would end up removing your coatings if you just cleaned your lenses frequently. I wouldn't do it.
- 3 replies
-
- Lens
- multicoating
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
It's diopter paradise now! Tamron 72mm +0.5 http://www.ebay.com/itm/271225543058 Unbranded 72mm +0.5 http://www.ebay.com/itm/221242819388
-
Kenko +0.5 72mm http://www.ebay.com/itm/271225191770 Tokina +0.5 72mm http://www.ebay.com/itm/271225484515 LOMO +1 and +2 for Squarefronts http://www.ebay.com/itm/251290044978 Canon 500D +2 72mm (acrobatic) http://www.ebay.com/itm/321142954261
-
Kenko +0.67 112mm http://www.ebay.com/itm/271224800201 Tiffen Series 9 Kit (+1, +2, +3) http://www.ebay.com/itm/130925088935
-
If I'm not mistaken, you should be safe from 85mm up on the 5D3 if you intend to use the WHOLE 3.56:1 image. If you're going to crop the sides to 2.4:1, then you can go with 55mm and up. :)
- 10 replies
-
- canon 5d mark iii;
- anamorphic;
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bolex 8/19/1.5x - getting rid of the back.
Tito Ferradans replied to Tito Ferradans's topic in Cameras
After many attempts, I finally got it out using a mechanic squeezer (?). :P