Nikkor

A nikon is no fun with manual glass when you are used to an EVF.

If you are a handyman you can probably make a conversion set on your own, if not: http://leitax.com/OlympusOM-lens-for-Nikon-cameras.html

Depending on your lenses you can convert the mount to nikon with the leitax conversion kit, it's not a hard modification, just a little bit costly.

Yeah, there is one currently selling for 468€ but they go for 400-700€ depending on your luck, the planar is more common and cheap, goes for 180-250€

No, I found it too late, he already sold them 200€ for both

I think I got it wrong, the new ones just added autofocus. But honestly, after seeing the samples from other other mounts, I think it sucks badtime (horrible corners starting very soon from the center), I really hope the mediumformat one won't be that bad

They should go fullframe and make small lenses (m43 equivalents)and leica like fast lenses. Sony is going the other route, making giantic lenses, so there is place for both.

Are you shure these are the same? I think they redesigned them.

Exactly. And the larger sensors are also better when you aren't fighting for photons, bright scenes or tripod, because of larger full well capacity. There is also one thing, the gaps between pixels may reflect photons.

Oh god, I just found a distagon 28 2 and a planar 50 1.4 for peanuts, but there are already 4 guys in line for the deal, fuuuuuuuu

But is it UHD? 4x 1080p????

We were kidding kaylee, they really should give some volume to that hair, looks like she didn't had a shower in some time. And yes, mulder is older too, but I have seen him over the years in californication.

It's pretty simple according to this http://www.johncaz.net/blog/tokina-at-x-pro-af-28-70mm-26-28 only the 2.6-2.8 are the good ones, the 2.8 not.

This means Panasonic has no mount for APS-C/Super35mm lenses. Don't ask why no PL.

If native ISO of 5000 means that it changes base sensitivity to iso 5000 with 14+ stops, then it's pretty amazing.

Yeah, it looks like as if she were 15years older with grey hair and bad color job. The camera is probably a sony, they should shoot with a canon c500.

Look at nikon hacker, the guy finally finds a way to get raw video, and suddenly dissapears forever.

I only have one account @nippon_kogaku

Bahahahahaha

Lol mercer, keep an eye on that GAS

Evil mattias :p The blur on the window made me think of medium format, it's this ver nice blur. The highlight color gave away it's film even before I zoomed in for the grain Here's a dirty scan from Portra 400 with the Pentax 67, 75mm 2.8 AL (I might have posted this before). You can see this beautiful relation between blur and infocus (excuse the newton rings, shitty scanner without inserts)

Haha, but man than there is nothing constant I was going to say the first was medium format, but it made no sense since it's a video forum :p

Yep the second must be the digital, bust just about any camera could look like that, the lens looks vintage.The grain on the film ones looks really good, I have 35mm scans that have worse grain than that. The lens is constant?

Then either that nikon lens is crap or you have a very bad copy

But was it in crop mode?