Nikkor
-
Posts
2,443 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by Nikkor
-
On the NX1 you could use the FD lenses and whatever fullframe glass you have. The nikon only takes nikon glass. But if you are keeping all the m43 lenses anyway, the gh4 seems like a nobrainer. Only using the gm1 is also an option, and use the money from the omd1 on something nice in the future. If you had a lot of nikon stuff the d750 could be a nice option because it's a great stills camera and the video is ok.
-
You will have to spend a lot of money if you want to get into a Nikon system.
-
No. Take a still photo, resize it to 1080p, see the difference.
-
I said its not about shallover dof.
-
They will be very similar, but they are different lenses so they won't be the same. The Fullframe lens will be bigger for shure ;) Flange distance only affects the way the lens has to be built. The 24mm SLR lens will be a retrofocus design, the mft lens might be a simetric design. The problem with non-retrofocus wideangles is that they aren't very telecentric (the rays that hit the sensor in the corners do it with a very small angle -angle between the ray and the sensor plane-) and this gives color shifts because light jumps from one pixel to another, but a 25mm lens on mft is a normal lens so it's ok. On the other hand a simetric design is easier to correct (so it's easier to make fast lenses), and in the case of wideangles it's much smaller in size. (leica m and mamiya 7 lenses are extremely good)
-
Whoa yea supa dupa dof.
-
The compression you are refering to will be the same as if you were cropping. In the image you can see how the perpendicular lines start getting closer and closer, that's the compression you get out of long lenses, but you could to the same cropping (or having a smaller sensor).
-
Imagine an infinite horizontal square section hallway, you are in the center of it with a camera watching down the hallway. The lines will converge on a point located at the same hight you are observing and located at an infinite point. You can use what ever focal length you want, they will always converge on the same point,and they will always have the same angle. The only thing that changes it the spatial relationship between points with different distances from the observer along the viewing axis. or just watch this image: Zooming in, or cropping in would have the same effect.
-
Matt that's not right, there might be some distortion differences between focal lengths, but the perspective/compression only depends on the distance between the observer and the object. That's the way conical projections work. That's not an opinion, it's a fact. A 25mm on m43 gives the same perspective/compression as a 50mm on FullFrame. The 25mm probably will have more distortions but that's because the m43 and c mount lenses usually have bad designs. And don't trust nofilmschool, it's a place full of half-knowledge designed for advertising and sponsoring income.
-
It's not about shallower dof.
- 47 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- focal length
- sensor size
- (and 3 more)
-
Sensor size, aperture size, that's completely irrelevent, it makes no difference at all, it's just a catch for retards so they spend money on big equipment.
-
6x7, 105mm. The great look of a 105mm lens with the horizontal fov of a 50mm FF. I hope they come up soon with a 0.5x speedbooster for the A7. I love my 105 2.5 nikkor on Fullframe, but it's only a crop of the beauty that only the mamiya rz 110 2.8 or the pentax 105 2.4 can give on full 6x7. 4x5 is another story and not really handholdable.
-
3.55/2.66= 1.33 17.5*1.33=23 So yes.
-
The NX1 is not a SLR because it has no mirror ;)
-
That site is dead, who cares. -
Well you could use medium fromat lenses then, if you ever wanted to use FF. For example, the pentax 6x7 55 3.5 is a pretty soft lens until f11 but some say it has a nice look to it. The only problem is that you won't find anything wider than 40mm and that these lenses aren't "compact". (all these lenses are super cheap) Who wants to go wider than 40mm (on 36mm wide) anyway when talking about cinematic :P Before I forget, you can put aluminium paper stripes into the adapter, this will give some serious contrast/streakes alterations because the image circle is so big and gets reflected onto the sensor if you give it the chance.
-
B doesn't have compression artifacts, but you should return your gh4 for a full refund anyway :p
-
A looks better than B. The first 4K samples that were available (the one of the chamaleon) showed a lot of color bleeding and less resolution on the video files (after resizing the jpg to 4K), so the downsampling from 6K to 4K isn't that great. Your samples seem to show something similar. But it still looks pretty good. Maybe it was just the betafirmware and A is video, lets see.
-
That looks better it doesn't jump into your face anymore, but you are having some strange artifacs going on around the hair and over the eyebrown. Luts do that kind of ugly stuff.
-
Yes it's a little bit scary ;)
-
It's all shot on a camera you already had, only the intro with the alien skin girl is A7s. Nice video, btw.
-
Looks sharp, but this makes the FM module look pretty bad because the test shots with the scheider looked more sankorish.
-
Richg101, could you post some 36mp samples with a 85 1.4?
-
If I cut a dollar note intro two, I got two dollars. Is there anybody who understands my idea?