padam

Maybe a lack of interest in general. Since by that 'logic', an FX6 (one of the best-selling cinema cameras) also doesn't make sense, they will replace that 3:2 sensor without ever making a model recording the full area.

Unlike the C70, it is easy to see from the front view that the C80/C400 sensor is not widescreen. It has 26.6 megapixels, but only uses 19, because it has no open gate option. Maybe they reserve that for a "hardware unlocked" model above the C400, who knows. That said, I am not sure that the LC1720, which is probably what the R6III will use is the same as those cinema cameras. Tests show less rolling shutter in an R3 than a C80, but also less dynamic range, no triple base ISO (and I wouldn't be surprised if C-Log 2 wasn't included).

FX9II coming in early 2024. Rumoured specs say global shutter, native ISO of 2000 & 6400 in S-Log3, seems in line with CVP's A9III tests. If I read it right, oversampled 4k120p in FF, S35 crop can also do oversampled FHD240p as well. Most interestingly, dynamic range is said to be maintained at 15+ stops. Maybe the A9III DR isn't nearly as bad as some preliminary thoughts make it out to be, but it's annoying that they don't say anything about it.

The importance of having less data for RAW video is underrated. I would much rather have the option to shoot (uncropped) 6K RAW than 8K (better quality 4K120p as well, although I would like it oversampled to make the full case for a 24MP sensor in a "perfect" hybrid camera.)

The R3 is neglected, available used/gray market for a lot less (R5 II will push it down further), 28-70/2 likewise. Of course the novelty of a 24-105/2.8 won't wear off that quickly.

Looking at footage of one of the testers, it seems that Dynamic Active Stabilization has improved markedly, without rolling shutter there are way less motion artifacts than before. Of course, if they release an A7SIV later with also a 24MP stacked sensor but with dial gain ISO without the glocal shutter with at least as good DR and ISO as before for less money, that would be more of an all-round hybrid camera. They just need to improve cooling and processing, as it seems that 4k120p oversampled is possible, it just can't deal with heat. (If they want to continue screwing customers, they can continue to leave out mechanical shutter for segmentation...)

The 8K is cropped and rolling shutter is horrendous on that sensor (also being used in the A7RV, Sigma Fp L, etc.). The outgoing R5 is a lot more capable. If Canon really puts a stacked sensor in the R5 Mark Il, it will pull way ahead as a high MP hybrid camera. Panasonic will not sure a sensor like this in an S2H. With the SL3 being more focused on stills, it is acceptable, but not a big departure from the SL2.

Yes, but it is a bigger body with no IBIS, they've disabled the AF for the 5.5k60p mode and in 5.5k30p it is running in a slower readout mode. The R3 may improve on these specs with much better rolling shutter using the stacked sensor, but it may also be limited by heat, although probably not nearly as much as the R5/R6.

The latest Intel processors will support 10-bit 4:2:2 H.265 hardware decoding which will work with DaVinci Resolve 17.1

I hope to see them side-by-side, but it looks just like R5 standard 4K to me.

So basically almost exacty the same as the R5 in all modes (except no 4K HQ).

4k30p binned goes long enough, I really don't need to shoot 4k60p for long (which is the same quality anyway, so it matches binned 4k30p perfectly), so it is flawless for me. The internal 30-minute clip limit is a little annoying and micro-HDMI are not great. But again, I don't consider these big enough flaws compared to the mountain of things that they've improved drastically for stills and video. For Canon, yes, this is a revelation, no doubt about it. The 5D IV or 1DX II had the same 30-minute limits (external output was useless) and yet many people used it for serious video without any issues at all. The simple truth is that there just aren't enough people out there to make this a real problem, even though they are the most vocal about it, it really won't matter at all in absolute terms. Whether something like a big feature comes out like 8K or an issue like overheating, the common thing is they get blown way, way out of proportion. Good for writing multiple articles. This is the same with the A7SIII by the way, I might say it is too specialised and limited for stills, but other professionals will buy it without hesitation because it is flawless for them.

Others left around the time of the EOS R, which already came after the A7III and initially received bad press, thinking Canon does not take mirrorless seriously at all. Even though they've already showed with their amazing lenses that they indeed do. I guess Sony A7SIII will come closest then (I expect it to offer DCI 4K), it is great to have choices and none of them will ever be perfect in absolute terms. I am not happy with some of the crippling they did with the R6 (But also not surprised and based on the past, I expected much worse), but the R5 seems almost flawless for the things it manages to offer, maybe they will improve this and that via firmware, I don't think they held back on it overall, and fixing some of these issues would have made it worse in other aspects, I really don't want it to be any bigger and heavier (or more expensive) than it already is. I was slightly squinting towards a Leica SL2. Yes, it is insanely priced, but it should perform best with my old lenses and it provides great looking images, that should translate well into video as well. But an R5 seems smaller, much more modern (swivel screen...) and cheaper, and it's certainly not worse in terms of overheating and battery compared to the Leica, that was a bit of a letdown considering the SL2 asking price. The R5 still costs three times as much as the EOS R, so it is a question of diminishing returns and I really need to think about when it is the time to get one - if I actually do.

Well the binned FF 4K on the R5 matches that very well in every sense (including rolling shutter) and it goes about for 1 hour 30 minutes. Could be more of an issue on the R6, yes, but again, apart from the S1 with the cropped 4k60p weak AF and big body, there is no FF camera to be mentioned alongside it. Personally, I'd just rather have overheating and AF than a big and heavy camera body. I simply don't need it to run non-stop (if someone would request it, I'd just go down to 1080p, better for file size, too) And of course it kills the GH5 (S1) for stills too, before we'd just forget that. I guess other people are just annoyed as they thought that they got the bare minimum from Canon in the past, like the 1DX II with cropped MJPEG and no Log, the 5D IV / EOS R or the 6D II / RP in the lower tier with an even worse crop factor, soft 1080p, etc. and it is suddenly a massive upgrade (with IBIS thrown it at the 'right time' as well for good measure) that no one predicted, so they might have left the system at the wrong time.

It probably sucks, if all the good stuff with the new firmware update like BRAW or Prores RAW are going out via HDMI.