IronFilm

And guess what... you'll be surprised how many productions still shoot in 1080! I think I work on 4K productions more often than "less than 4K" productions (so including 2K for instance here as well). But I'm honestly not sure! 4K might be losing out. (but if 4K isn't in the majority yet, I get the feeling it will be soon. Can just depend on a bit of random chance, what type of productions I've been working on lately) This just gives you an idea of how slowly things can change, it's certainly not 4K+ only and always being used everywhere. And why ProRes is still the most popular choice, and won't be going away any time soon. Things change slower than you think.

Yup, and for everyone using mirrorless cameras recording raw onto an external recorder, well, that's an entire market segment which I rarely overlap with! As it's a bit too low budget to ever use a Sound Mixer much. And that end of the market has less of a need to confirm to any particular workflow demands, or can be more flexible with their workflow in making changes to accommodate, or they just simply don't care

ProRes is is the widespread industry standard, I work on productions more often using ProRes than anything else! It is absolutely unthinkable that DaVinci Resolve wouldn't support ProRes

That's totally fine! The Blackmagic Design Cinema Camera 6K can just simply give us ProRes in 4K DCI, UHD, 2K, and 1080. In all frame rates. That would be awesome! No. BRAW is a widely implemented standard. Widely implemented in NLEs and other post tools? Kinda. Widely implemented in cameras? Definitely not! Only Blackmagic does it internally. Widely used? Definitely not! So far this year, I myself have been on shoots with only 3 DoPs which used braw, they were also some of the very lowest budget shoots I've been on (almost no budget): 1) acting student shoot using Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 4.6K 2) acting student shoot using Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro G2 3) a short film for a children's acting program using a Blackmagic Pocket (I forgot which Pocket, I think it was the original 6K or the G2? Funnily enough, I'm doing a second shoot with them this weekend! I'll find see which Pocket it was) So you can see it really is mostly the low / no budget shoots which are using a braw. The majority of shoots I work on are shooting in ProRes, with a minority in some flavor of raw, or in some flavor of a 10bit codec (such as XAVC). Eh, all the reasons to use ProRes still remain today. It's a solid codec which ticks all the boxes and does the job, why should productions bother to waste time on trying out anything else and changing their workflow? If anything, the negatives of ProRes are becoming less and less relevant with time. I remember way back when I purchased the OG BMPCC, that recording 1080 ProRes HQ seemed like such a hassle for me, with the huge files, the expensive and fast&large SD cards I needed to buy, the extra storage space for each project, etc etc Fast forward a bunch of years, and all my concerns about ProRes are a trivial concern now. You don't need super fancy ultra expensive cards to support ProRes now, even quite large cards are dirt cheap to buy, and as for the extra terabytes of storage needed? Who cares now!! Yes, eventually ProRes will no longer be used, but that will not be a fast change. It will be a slow and gradual change, and heck, it might even get more popular before it starts to decline.

That is why I hope in a few months time BMD releases a firmware update with ProRes, once Apple has taken their sweet time to approve it. ProRes is the widespread industry standard, that's an easy enough reason to support it.

Just NDs thanks! I'll throw my SmallHD Focus on it as a monitor

That's the dream, a BMD camera with a mirrorless mount and NDs! So very few affordable cameras do this. You're either looking at ones secondhand, or likely paying for at least as much as a Canon C70 / Sony FX6. So if BMD kept the L mount but added in NDs (either eND, or at least a clear + 3 stages of ND), say boosting the price up by a few hundred but still sub US$3K then it would be a pretty easy win as the best camera for me at that price point. Ahead of Sony FX3 / Panasonic S5mk2 / etc (I might still rate a preference to get the Sony FX30 instead though, it would after all be half the price. Is why what I really want to see is the standard P4K with ND!)

Why don't you like a flip out screen? Just buy a SmallHD monitor? What's wrong with its form factor? You're using it on a tripod after all to film landscapes / nature. Agreed, the C70 is very much so a smaller / lighter C300mk3 if you don't need all the extra settings & extra I/O (which @Jedi Master doesn't). Yes, but how was it shot? The same camera shot at golden hour vs harsh sunlight can look totally different. Also a lot of this comes down to personal preferences and what each brand is trying to achieve. It's like that classic Nikon vs Canon battle in photography. Where Nikon leans towards color accuracy while Canon says screw accuracy and leans towards a "pleasing" look (as a lot of people don't want to accurately capture the world, instead they wanted to capture it like they wished it looked). But in the end, that's just where they lean towards by initial default, and either can be made to look like the other. It's why I reckon you should rent a few cameras, when you're going to be spending this much. I'd suggest you rent: 1) at least one of any BMD Pocket 2) at least one of any BMD URSA Mini 3) at least one of any ARRI cameras 4) Panasonic S1H and/or S5mk2 (with a Ninja V recorder too if you can) 5) at least one of Sony FX30/FX3/FX6 6) Sony FX9 7) any RED Dragon body 8 ) any RED Komodo body 9) any one of the modern Panasonic Varicams (or if not, at least a Panasonic EVA1 with a raw recorder??) 10) Canon C300mk3 11) Canon C70 12) whatever other random wild card camera you might be able to get your hands on locally (any of the Z Cam / Kinefinity / Fujifilm / C700 / F35 / etc cameras) Even at a rate of shooting with one of these per week, that list will keep you busy for a few months! As there is a massive difference between reading about a camera online vs using it in the field. Believe it or not, every single camera from that list I've worked with on productions!! And many many more. (although of course, I don't touch their files afterwards, as I'm not in post production. But am a PSM / 1st AS) Meh, I reckon raw is rather overrated. You'll be surprised how very very rarely I work on productions recording in raw. If you can't nail a good image in camera with a solid 10bit codec then you might have bigger issues to worry about first. It is currently on sale (I think for Black Friday?), only US$5K! https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1776944-REG/blackmagic_design_ursa_mini_pro_12k.html I still don't quite understand why you're so keen on buying a brand new but old RED?? If for some reason I went with a RED (I wouldn't! Bad business decision, but let's just pretend I am doing this), then I'd go with either the most dirt cheap approach I can to maximize my value (such as a secondhand RED Scarlet Dragon for instance, their brains can be found for sub US$2K) or I'd go with the latest gen of RED I could afford with a new RED Komodo X (or in your case, go for a RED Komodo X, as you don't need the extra A Cam I/O features that the Komodo X has over the standard Komodo). The RED Komodo is only sub $6K to buy the body, as it is on sale right now: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1677830-REG/red_digital_cinema_710_0359_komodo_6k_starter_pack.html Then I'd pair it with a couple of the very affordable Fujinon cine zoom lenses: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1603697-REG/fujinon_38512012_mk_r_18_55mm_t2_9_lens.html https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1603698-REG/fujinon_38512013_mk_r_50_135mm_t2_9_lens.html

You give up built in NDs and S35, but you gain a mirrorless mount. I think it makes sense to get the L Mount camera. Especially as you already have a S5! Surely ProRes is just one firmware update away?? Right?

Ughhh... Hate how I can't edit this just because six minutes has passed. I meant to say the new 8030, with 8050 (or 8040, depending on your tastes). Would seriously suggest you go with *both* options (Sennheiser M/S + DPA 2017), it isn't that pricey (much cheaper than some other alternatives), & quite affordable vs the camera budget you've got in mind. As the use of a 2017 vs M/S are quite different purposes, so you could go for one or the other (or both at once, your F6 has plenty of channels to record all of them) depending on what it is you're trying to record

It would, you could use your Zoom F Series recorder as the master, jam TC from that into a timecode box then put it on the camera Then you'll always have files that start out being perfectly frame accurate with each other. Get say a Deity TC1 for instance https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1705805-REG/deity_microphones_dtt0272d80_tc_1.html And if you're going to be spending so much on a new camera, I'd suggest upgrading your mic too? Say the new DPA 2017 for instance looks good? And is priced drastically cheaper than DPA mics normally are. Or maybe even go a bit more fancy, and go for a midside setup, especially now that Sennheiser just released the 8020 the other day. Now you can make a very compact setup of that with an 8060 in a blimp

I 100% can and do see that, I agree. Know quite a few people who don't do narratives any more because of those hours and grind it takes on your life, focusing instead on something else like docos or commercials. If image quality is what you want, then yeah ARRI AMIRA is "the best" ENG camera. Not so good in some other areas though (like size, weight, powering demands!). I think the big reason people would use the nanoflash recorder with it was just so they could have anything which was better than that lightweight 35mbs codec One with 2/3" & B4 mount? So you mean the Panasonic AG-HPX500 perhaps? There is one on eBay right now that just got listed for US$545: https://www.ebay.com/itm/266503459184 If you can settle for the GH4 sensor instead there is the Panasonic DVX200! 😛 Wish they'd kept on updating the DVX200 each time there was a new GH series sensor. Or even better, let you swap out the lens on the DVX200!

That's why a lot of the Sony EX3 shooters would pair with with a nanoflash recorder for more premium shoots. Of course the Panasonic AJ-HPX3000 doesn't have that problem with its 1080p 10bit 422 😉 Correct! Yeah, it's always a trade off somewhere with these older cheap cameras! 😞 1) very lightweight codecs (sometimes you can work around that, with external recorders. Or it doesn't matter, as you're using it for live streaming purposes) 2) teeny sensors (well... even 2/3" is "small", but it's "large" relative to this, and what I'd prefer. But I'd like at least 1/2" like the EX1/EX3 is, not any less) 3) only 720p and/or 1080i (this is a very common issue with the Panasonics, they were slower 4) not worldwide (you can't do both 25 & 30) 5) no SDI (quite a few of these older / lower end ones would only have RCA as the video output, or might have SDI but only SD not FHD over SDI) 6) no interchangeable lenses (ideally B4 mount, but something like EX3's mount I guess I could live with that gets adapted to B4) It's quite hard to find an older camera which hits all of these points and stays well under US$1K in being easily able to find Sooo true! I need to resist. Today a mate on Instagram (he's an EOSHD user too) asked me about what gear I had in mind to get: Me: On the topic of Sonys, if you know about anybody looking to buy a Sony FS7 I've got one for sale Time to sell it and buy more sound gear instead Oops, slip of the tongue I meant, and NOT spend more money on gear 🙄😅 Him: Ohh what gear u looking for next 😏 Me: Thinking I might move a bit more over from Lectrosonics to Sony Digital Might also change my Lectrosonics IFB setup from running in blk22 to blk20 Although ugh, that's such a big hassle as I've got so much stuff in those frequencies But these Sonys are so wideband , blk22 creeps into the bottom of it, and I'd rather keep my Lectrosonics IFB transmitters going out of my bag far away from my incoming receivers frequency range Also why I want to buy a RF filter I think, turn my wideband into narrowband ish. I kinda want two of these: https://www.rfvenue.com/hardware/rf-accessories-and-parts/band-pass-filters But they have nothing in the frequencies I need it to be in 😞 This is a new product, not in production and available to buy yet, however I think it could be the closest to what I need: https://www.audiowireless.co.uk/online-store/DIGITALLY-TUNED-DUAL-ANTENNA-FILTER-DT-BOOST-2-p481882216 Just waiting on specs/price I guess, fingers crossed! Him: Oops I shouldn't have asked 😂 Me: haha, and that's just scratching the surface! although yeah nah, I need to resist spending any more money this year. But I earlier this year upgraded my boom audio to having two Sony DWT-P01N transmitters (for the last several years my Boom Ops would use Sound Devices MM1 running into a Lectrosonics Digital Hybrid bodypack transmitter), as I felt that was a better path than going with Lectrosonics DPR or Shure AD3 transmitters which were the other two main choices for digital wireless that I was considering. However that then just opens the door to lots of other changes I want too

ehhh... I forgot about that URL being blacklisted, my bad I'll link instead to something else mentioning the raw updates (I can't edit the post, as more than 5 minutes has elapsed): Panasonic S1H / BS1H / S5mk2 X would also all be great choices. https://www.dpreview.com/news/1509469257/panasonic-blackmagic-raw-recording-more-to-the-s1h-s1-forthcoming-firmware-updates https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1743629-REG/panasonic_dc_s5miix_ff_mirrorless_camera.html https://petapixel.com/2023/05/09/panasonic-announces-blackmagic-raw-compatibility-for-s5iix-and-s5ii/

This is a good example of what I'm talking about, how your priorities / needs / deal breakers are very very different to what it is for a professional. The a6500 is wildly unsuitable for professional usage, because it is completely unreliable due to overheating issues. The only people using the a6500 "professionally" are: low budget videographers (such as wedding filmmakers), students, vloggers, or people using the a6500 is a noncritical role (such as Sony FX9 owner op, who has an a6500 as their C Cam) And while the RED cameras are seen as very unreliable, they're still from a professional perspective much more reliable than showing up on set with a Sony a6500! As for Blackmagic reliability, I'd rate them a bit higher than an equivalent priced RED. Keep in mind that "reliability" is not only relative to what level production it's on (vloggers vs the next hollywood blockbuster film) but also relative to what era we're talking about. RED had their peak during the early years of digital filmmaking, when expectations were lower and tolerances were higher. As standing around waiting for a RED to cool down was still no slower than waiting for a film mag to be reloaded, or having an SDI output blow was no big deal because hey lots of S16 / S35 film shoots didn't even have video villages! But for this to happen today??? 110% unacceptable!! And that is the era in which Blackmagic exists in now, as Blackmagic's popularity didn't really get super high until the URSA Mini launched (and the Pocket 4K / 6K as well). So Blackmagic now has to live up to much higher standards and expectations than RED did back when RED first gained popularity. But in absolute terms, I'd probably give BMD the edge over any vaguely equivalent priced RED in terms of reliability. But anyway, both RED and BMD I'd rate higher than an a6500. (at least in the terms of things that could go wrong, it wouldn't hold you back from filming in the same manner as you would with an a6500) Carrying on this point, lots of reasons why people would use many of these higher end cameras, are not relevant to your use case (you don't at all need multiple independent SDI outputs for instance). Even going for a Sony FX3 could be a big leap up for you, and could be the right choice? Even though I'd personally rather have an FX9! But that's because I'm wanting a dozen features the FX9 has, but are features you don't need. https://ymcinema.com/2023/11/01/atomos-prores-raw-sony-fx3-alexa/ Panasonic S1H / BS1H / S5mk2 X would also all be great choices. https://*banned URL*/atomos-panasonic-s1h-prores-raw Nice, it's a real couple's activity you do together! 🙂 Which mic are you using? You should definitely get yourself a timecode box to use with your future camera purchase and the Zoom F6.

Just got to have plenty of light and be ok with deeper DoF! And be ok with FHD, and not 4K. And not need slow motion. Both traits/requirements that are perfectly fine for the gigs that The Cranky Cameraman was on in those videos. His channel in general I think is quite a good watch for lots of people who visit EOSHD who are at that sort of level (doing solo or very small crew work, but still making a very good living from that). Here is another video talking about EX3 vs FS7: The evil camera gear GAS bug bites me in wanting a Sony PMW-EX3 as well. (or the even cheaper EX1) Or hey, I've been commenting a bit lately about the Panasonic Varicam LT & Panasonic BS1H, so maybe I should look more into the Panasonic equivalent? I don't know the Panasonic range so well though, what would be the Panasonic equivalent to the EX1/EX3 from Sony? Perhaps the Panasonic AG-HPX250? (kinda equivalent to the EX1?) Or the Panasonic AG-HPX300 / 370 (kinda equivalent to the EX3??) Or go nuts for the big beasty Panasonic AJ-HPX3000, with 1080p 10bit 422 (body only is US$1.5K on ebay right now, but no lens / cards / batteries )

@Jedi Master, here is a range of opinions you can read about RED in one place: https://www.premiumbeat.com/blog/future-of-red-cameras/ Interesting, and this would work with the URSA Mini Pro 4.6K as well? (or only for the 12K? Googling seems to indicate only for the 12K?) Hmmm... does make it vaguely more tempting to get an URSA Mini Pro, as they can be got for sub US$2K But nah, I need to get out of the camera business, sell the Sony FS7 and get nothing. No replacement. And if I'm silly enough to get another camera, the Sony PMW-F5 is only US$1.5K now!! Bonkers cheap. (although most are more like US$2K+) Or I go bonkers, splurging the $3.5K to $4K for a Panasonic Varicam LT.

Ummm... all of them?? (except maybe RED Ranger???) Although the more modern ones will do better. The RED ONE of course being the worst, I was on a shoot where they draped frozen bags over it. Like I said, RED is infamous for this. Hated by the sound department, as we'll go over and ask for them to turn their fans down, and they'll whine "no we can't, otherwise it will overheat". But in you case, you'll be using the more modern-ish DSCM2 body, and you don't need to care about the sound dept, you can just happily crank up that fan to go at max noise all day long. Yup, this is why I think there is a strong argument for a Blackmagic Design, or Panasonic Varicam LT (or even EVA1 / S5 / S1H / BS1H ) or Fujifilm X-H2S or old ARRI ALEXA rather than a Sony or RED

I think there is a strong argument here to buy one of the top of the line cameras from a previous generation. Rather than an arguably "better" camera for your purposes that just came out yesterday, such as the Blackmagic Design Cinema Camera 6K (with L Mount). You can enjoy the feeling of owning and using one of the most premium cameras that have ever been made, without suffering the rapid depreciation you'd experience with buying new a much more modern but low/mid range camera such as a C300mk3 or FX6 or URSA Mini 12K or Dragon-X. (yeah, cameras such as the FX6 etc are indeed viewed as "low end" by many, but good enough that others can view them as "mid range". They kinda sit in the middle of low/mid range, straddling both categories) As I think for you, a lot of it is about the experience of using and owning these. Plus by getting a premium secondhand camera, it's wouldn't be that expensive at all for you to every couple of years to sell that camera and buy another one to experience the joy of owning and using. If you wanted to go through that regular cycle of using a range of them, rather than sticking with just one for the next 5 or maybe even 10yrs. (which could easily be the lifespan of a FX6 / C300mk3 / URSA Mini 12K / etc if you eek out the most from its lifespan) Here are ones I reckon you should look at: ARRI ALEXA Classic ARRI AMIRA Sony PMW-F55 Sony PMW-F65 Panasonic Varicam LT (maybe Panasonic EVA1) Canon C500mk1 (you'll want to pair it with an Convergent Design Odyssey 7Q), & maybe the Canon 1D C (if you like owning what was also a top of the line stills camera for its era as well. The Canon 1D C is very old now, but the image out of it is still liked by some) Canon C700 (there is one listed right now for US$5K: https://www.ebay.com/itm/334993242877 )

I though hated this setup when I would rent a BMD URSA Mini for shoots. As you lose valuable outputs to this. Making it a pain to give a feed to everyone who needs it (you/1stAC/director/etc). Was one of the factors why I decided to go with a Sony FS7 instead when I upgrade my camera from the PMW-F3. Irrelevant for OP though, they need somewhere between zero and one output. (hooking up a high quality SmallHD 7" or 10" monitor I think could really improve what they do) RED however has a history of many many many cameras overheating. They're infamous for this. I've experienced this myself. While BMD cameras don't, I can't remember the last time I read about a BMD camera overheating?? & I've never ever personally experienced this myself. Clearly one company is doing it all right, and the other company is doing it all wrong when it comes to thermal management. Yeah even the original Panasonic S5 would be perfectly great for their purposes, as they don't need the latest AF. Although, in their shoes I'd still lean towards one of: 1) keeping it simple and lightweight with a BMD 4K (MFT mount) or 6K (L Mount) camera, they'll get the most out of these with the least effort (remember, OP works full time too. They can't spent 10,000 hours on this to squeeze the most out of a camera, like normal professionals would if buying say a RED or Kinefinity. It's a case of filming it then edit it over an evening or two, then do it again) 2) going full on nuts and getting a secondhand ARRI ALEXA , as they have a generous budget and don't have to lug it that far

Even for your purposes, lots of stuff there is handy to have, such as a Mattebox and filters. (especially if you're getting a RED, and not say an AMIRA or URSA Mini Pro etc) Eh, RED had a brief flash in the pan as an alternative to S35 film. But it wasn't for long, as it wasn't that many years later when the ARRI ALEXA Classic was released. (the ARRI D20 btw came out a few years before the RED ONE, and the ARRI D21 came out the same year as the RED ONE. With the ARRI ALEXA itself coming out just a couple of years later) From that point on, the RED never held a premium top spot. (if it even ever did... remember, the Sony PMW-F35 came out at the same time as the RED ONE! The RED ONE wasn't better, merely drastically more affordable) Make sure you buy a Varicam LT on eBay that comes with media, it's one of the benefits of buying secondhand. Or use an external recorder to record to cheap SSDs. You can get even more out of the camera that way anyway. Or get secondhand cards, they're really cheap now. https://www.ebay.com/itm/175229407783 https://www.ebay.com/itm/195107473555 https://www.ebay.com/itm/203903314352 Non-detachable screen is a non-issue. Most cameras are like this. CFast cards are cheap ($479 for 1TB: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1778914-REG/angelbird_1tb_av_pro_cf.html ), so I don't understand this objection. Plus, if you want to, you could record to SSDs: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1578182-REG/blackmagic_design_cineursashmssd2_ursa_mini_recorder.html Reliability concerns are a nonissue, it's cheap enough you'll be buying it brand new under warranty. And the difference for you in reliability between 0.1% vs 0.01% (which is a BIG DEAL for a professional, that they'll make a lot of noise about online complaining) is a non-issue for your purposes. (plus you're happy to consider the even less reliable RED, so I'm sure BMD will be just fine for you!) Just buy it from a local major dealer such as B&H and that will take care of all your servicing worries within the warranty period. And if a camera is being serviced in the long term is irrelevant, the value of it will have dropped like a stone and it would be cheap to just buy another from eBay than to pay the labour and parts fees for your own old secondhand camera to be fixed. If you like the idea of a C300mk3, then get the C70, is the same sensor without all the extra I/O you won't be using on your types of shoots.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/zaxcom-sues-rode-microphones-for-wireless-tech-patent-damages Yeah, I read about that the day it became news. Zaxcom has done a lot of good for the industry, but sometimes I wonder if it has done more bad than good...

A little more about the Panasonic Varicam LT for you to consider: https://www.newsshooter.com/2016/06/26/field-testing-the-panasonic-varicam-lt-a-hands-on-review-for-solo-shooters/ https://www.newsshooter.com/2016/06/03/panasonic-varicam-lt-do-i-like-you-an-owner-operators-perspective-from-miguel-toran/ https://www.newsshooter.com/2017/07/18/the-gods-of-fire-2k240fps-raw-recording-with-the-panasonic-varicam-lt-and-odyssey7q/ (you don't have to go with Convergent Design: https://www.newsshooter.com/2017/03/23/atomos-announce-a-free-cdng-raw-recording-firmware-update-for-shogun-inferno-flame-and-the-original-shogun/ ) https://*banned URL*/2017/05/review-panasonic-varicam-lt https://www.provideocoalition.com/review-panasonic-varicam-lt-4k-super35mm-cine-camera/ https://www.provideocoalition.com/panasonic-varicam-lt-review-part-2/ https://*banned URL*/2016/07/panasonic-varicam-lt-review https://cinescopophilia.com/comparing-to-the-panasonic-varicam-lt-to-the-sony-fs7-camera/ Geoff Boyle is a very very highly respected cinematographer, here is what he has to say about his tests with the Panasonic Varicam LT: https://www.newsshooter.com/2015/03/31/which-cine-camera-produces-the-best-image-geoff-boyle-has-surprises-in-store/ https://www.newsshooter.com/2016/03/09/bve-2016-cinematographer-geoff-boyle-says-arri-have-a-problem-likes-varicam-lt-image-uses-c300mkii-autofocus/ https://www.cinematography.net/Panasonic-VaricamLT-RAW-UHD-2017.html https://definitionmagazine.com/reviews/review-panasonic-varicam-lt/ If you want to go super lightweight (although I know weight doesn't matter much to you, but it might for other people reading this), you could consider "the baby Varicam LT", the Panasonic EVA1: https://www.newsshooter.com/2017/06/03/panasonic-au-eva1-first-impressions/ They're sub $2K now: https://www.ebay.com/itm/335107746560

It is a very minimal setup. And like I said, that price puts it within touching distance of a secondhand ARRI AMIRA. (or heck, a Panasonic Varicam LT for well under half the cost! https://www.ebay.com/itm/225662483059 I'd in a heartbeat go for the Varicam LT over any RED Dragon. Especially as you don't mind the weight or boot up time) I just don't see the appeal in buying an old RED (yes, it's brand new, but it's on its way out, mere seconds away from being discontinued). When you could for quite a bit less get the latest BMD / ZCam / Kinefinity / Fijifilm / Panasonic. It's not the late 2000's / early 2010's, RED no longer holds any special significance in my eyes. Some options for you to consider: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1747932-REG/kinefinity_kc_m2_s35_apl_mavo_mark2_s35_body.html (also in E Mount) https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1787634-REG/blackmagic_design_cinema_camera_6k.html https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1664826-REG/panasonic_dc_bs1h_lumix_bs1h_full_frame_box_style.html https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1401565-REG/atomos_atomnjav01_ninja_v_5_4k.html https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1708265-REG/fujifilm_16756924_x_h2s_mirrorless_camera.html (with a Ninja V) https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1500709-REG/z_cam_e2_s6_pl_e2_s6_super_35_6k.html (also in E Mount) If you go for a mirrorless S35 mount camera, then getting the Fujinon MK lenses would be very tasty, and are priced quite low for how high quality they are (can be in E / X / MFT mount): https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1495860-REG/fujinon_mk18_55mm_and_mk50_135mm_t2_9.html

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/products/On-Camera-Batteries/ci/3469?sort=BEST_SELLERS&filters=fct_wattage-mah_3080%3A190-wh|192-wh|193-wh|195-wh|196-wh|198-wh You could maybe even settle for smaller 150Wh batteries. But I feel once you get under 100Wh then it gets annoying, you start to want to remember to baby the camera and turn it on / off all the time to make sure you get the most out of your couple of hours per battery.