Marcio Kabke Pinheiro

It is exactly this - everyone is trying to get a piece of the ZV-E10 (which is a HUGE seller for Sony), but positioning the cameras as hybrids. A good move, I should say. And with the dedicated button to switch custom picture profiles in the Z50 II, now oficially Fujifilm (which created the market for "filmish" picture profiles) is the worst brand if you want to use custom picture proflies. Great job, Fuji.

RIsky move, because of all the sensor issues already mentioned. Depending on the price, could be a "budget' mf option. "Oh, but the Fuji colors" - sorry, this is a non-issue on cine market, where everything is heavily color graded. But between this and the rumored "half frame" 1-inch camera, worries me as a Fuji user that development resources are being wasted in risky markets - much better be used to pay some Sony guys to change place for AF, and some Olympus guys for IBIS tuning in video...

DX Z-mount needs ASAP the Sigma 18-50 f/2.8. For primes, I guess that Viltrox will be one of the bigger sellers. About the Z50 II - solid camera for the price. But would be even beter with an IBIS for $100 more.

Honorable mention to DJI - because they are thinking kinda outside the box. And choose to grow in unexplored markets. They started with drones, and snowballed the market - except in some niche sectors, they crushed everyone else. Second marlet tried was cine, with the DJI Ronin 4D - which I think is the most innovative camera of the decade. A lot of completely new stuff there - the LIDAR Af with the depth map for manual focus, the wheel control, the 4 axis gimbal. Not so great in ergo, but was an amazing achievement. This path they not suceed, but was a ambitious 1st try. And the Osmo Pocket 3 - almost everyone that tries it falls in love (including me). Amazingly easy to operate (my wife is using it to make social media videos for her clients, she knows NOTHING about filming, and the videos come out very good), very good stabilization, and the image quality is like 80% of my X-S20. The only camera that I ever used in auto ISO - its metering is VERY good. And in a very unusual and compact form factor, a REAL pocket cam. There are rumors that they will enter the traditional camera market - I have my doubts, since all the markets already established that they entered they have no (the Ronin 4D) or ok success (action cams and gimbals). They rise on unexplored paths - and I guess that if they make a camera, would be breaking some molds. (albeit I suspect that the 1st breaking mold camera should be - or MUST be, to be a success - the 1 inch "half-frame" Fuji)

Same here, but not impossible. Here in this forum nobody talks about the ZV-E10 I and II, and probably is the most sold Sony camera, in number of units. In a "creator" group that I was some time ago, the ZV-E10 was the camera from about 80% of the users. And the ones that started to make money, updated to the FX30 or FX3.

I love Panasonic - grown with them, love the UI that they use, anytime that I get my FZ1000 it feels home. But (at least until now), the course of MFT was what I predicted when I left it for Fuji - relegated to niche formats (video for Panasonic, wildlife / adventure for OM Digital). Big bodies, big lenses. And specifically for Panasonic, I think that if the L-Mount dont get more traction in the next batch of cameras, Panasonic will go OM Digital or Samsung route. Their Lumix division is a drop in a bucket inside Panasonic, don't generate much income, and consume a lot of resources. Maybe just kept the minimum to make the Leicasonics L-Mount cameras.

In my view was a mistake to drop APS-C L Mount. If they make a APC-S GM5, with the Sony 26mp sensor, IBIS, a decent EVF, with PDAF and their LUT system, I would switch form Fuji ASAP. With a Sigma 18-50 would be a winner. Don´t want to develop APS-C lenses? Bring Viltrox to the party. Their 75mm f/1.2 is the sharpest lens that I've ever had. Their cheap primes are good and affordable. TT Artisan is doing interesting stuff too.

What is MUCH more embarassing for Panasonic is that they launched it with a 26mm f/8 manual focus lens that costs $199. VIltrox just launched a 28mm F/4.5 lens WITH autofocus, with almost the same size. Much sharper, much brighter, and, as said, with AF. For $99.

Came here just to put this link, heheheh Will try this Arri Log trick in my X-S20. About the X-M5 - dismissed it because it have no EVF and IBIS (and I have the X-S20, that have the same internals). But this damn thing is so cute and is the 1st Fuji with a very competitive price launched in a long time (looking at you, X-T50), that I'm tempted. And compared to the camera that is its competitor, the Sony ZV-E10 II, apart from the AF, it is better in almost every aspect. And cheaper. Very good move, Fuji. Now bring me a X-E5 with IBIS, EVF and a 40mp sensor (for stills - the X-S20 is MUCH better than the 40mp models for video).

Got one some time ago for around 280 euros in today's exchange. Of course with some problems, but all far from deal breakers. - The back LCD have some coating delamination, but only visible when it is turned off. Turned on, zero problems - id just a cosmetic issue. - The EVF have a little "fogging", looks like the camera is using a black mist filter. But the stills and video ouput are perfect, hence for framing and exposure evaluation, is a no problem. - There is a dust spot on the sensor. It is a very "glued" one - tried to dislodge it with a variety of methods, but with no sucess. Only appear with very close apertures in stills, and in video with some directional light. Planning to clean the sensor myself - iFixit have a complete and detailed disassembly guide, and I guess that the sensor could be removed without removing the lens assembly like in their guide. Biggest trouble - to realign the sensor again after removing, the sensor assembly is mounted with screws + springs. Common method is to mark the screws positions, tight them to the end and count the number of rotations befor removing; my plan is to use this method in conjuction with a precision digital depth meter (already bought one), to measure the depth between the lens assembly and the sensor backplate around the screws. Using the two methods together, I guess that I could mount it again with good precision. The images looks like that have a bit of "halation" - much less than the EVF one. Since the camera came from a beach city, my take is that some of the sea moisture entered the EVF and on the sensor surface, one more reason to clean the sensor. But even in the current state, was weel worth the price. Is my live concert camera - since security generally have rules agains "cameras that change lenses", this one they cannot do nothing against. Stils are very good with a bit of sharpening post. Video have the greener cast of the GH4 pipeline era, but is good enough, and filming in Cinelike-D with a good LUT have a solid quality. Love the ergos - I was "raised" with Panasonic cameras, and their ergos / interface are second nature for me. The camera feels a bit hollow, though. One particular thing (that I don't know if it another issue from my unit) - the external mic input is VERY hot. With the external mike that I use on all my cameras (a Andycine M1), the level explodes even when turned down to a minimum. Will buy an attenuator cable (in fact, a headphone volume controller) to lower the input signal. The internal mikes were bad as the last Panasonic ones are - since it had two big grilles, I expected that were good ones like the GH2 had, but...not. Like it a lot - my old M43s cameras had a a bit better IQ, and the X-S20 have a much better IQ, but for the praticality (and in most cases, being allowed into venues) and the current prices, was a very good aquisition.

Smartphones made it worse, but people nowadays simply don't READ. Nothing. Never. In any form. Is all video and podcasts - generally speed up by 1.5x times. And Anantech (which is probably one of the sites that I've visited most in my life) had another problem - since the Anand's departure, it became excessively technical. It always was the most technical site, but Anand had talent to make a deeply technical review be pleasent to read. In the last years, the writing there became ONLY technical, to a point that a person that like that kind of review unpleasant to read. (and to find a hardware test dedicated to filming software is almost impossíble - the closest is the Puget tests, which are very limited. And there goes a bunch of people spending a bunch in a top Ryzen config with a beastie RTX card only to discover that it could not decode 10bit 4:2:2 on hardware)

Caleb Pike (aka DSLR VIdeo Shooter) started a new business (in fact, it is his main business now) of making these "cube like" attacment for mirroless cameras. The Sony ones are cool, even have space for small fans to prevent overheating.

There is a software problem. Android is too heavy for a camera operating system, except if somene makes a VERY lightweight and specialized fork - and I guess that for use the original Android apps, would be not lightweight enough. Maybe someone should give Tizen another look - just for the interface part. About apps, there should be a basic editor on camera, and social media posting would be much better be done by some kind of server that receives the pictures with login credentials and post it on social media; but nowadays almost all social media don't have anymore exernal APIs (because ads). Pixii is doing very interesting things with Linux in their cameras, but is far from smartphones.

I guess we still have the mistery about how makes the 25mp sensor of the GH6/7 and G9Mk II? In the launch, Panasonic hinted that it was supplied by a "unusual party", if I remember correctly.

I'm in the verge of a computer upgrade (forced to update to Windows 11 before the end of 2025, because MS will pull the lug on Windows 10 support), and since my X-S20 records on H.265 10-bit 4:2:2, I've searching about this decoding issues on timeline. Bottom line: Puget Systems have a chart that is constant updated, showing what codecs are hardware decoded (encoding is another story). H265 10-bit 4:2:2 are currently ONLY supported by Intel CPUs using QuickSync (which means that you have to choose a CPU with integrated GPU, even if you will use a external GPU). https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/what-h-264-and-h-265-hardware-decoding-is-supported-in-davinci-resolve-studio-2122/ Worse: I've been trying for weeks to discover which codecs are HW decoded by the newer Snapdragon CPUs, and even in Qualconn pages I could no get this info.