-
Posts
3,110 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About fuzzynormal
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Location
planet
-
Interests
things
-
My cameras and kit
bunch of old stuff
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
n/a
Recent Profile Visitors
14,112 profile views
fuzzynormal's Achievements
Long-time member (5/5)
2.4k
Reputation
-
Something is nagging at me to go back to smaller sensor
fuzzynormal replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
You joke, but I spent this summer getting my old Amiga 2500 back up and running and playing around with the VT. As for FC7. The best looking movie I ever made was cut in FC7 and shot with a LUMIX gx7, so.... -
eatstoomuchjam reacted to a post in a topic: Something is nagging at me to go back to smaller sensor
-
Something is nagging at me to go back to smaller sensor
fuzzynormal replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Or if you fart within arms length of the rig. Looks cool when it work though. -
Something is nagging at me to go back to smaller sensor
fuzzynormal replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Yeah, if a move isn't motivated, then...why do it? On the other hand, it's a lot of fun to actually and effectively realize motivated movement; movement that helps tell the story. When that happens you're now not just getting coverage, but doing things that start to get cinematic, imo. Been working on two documentaries this year and I've literally wanted to shake the camera-people that shot the footage and ask them how they like it. Spaztic shooting, very amateur hour. For the most part I don't use tripods these days for my own stuff, but I try to stay as quiet with the lens as possible. Still, I would have loved a heavy duty smooth-as-silk-Sachtler for some recent wildlife work where I was over (ffeq) 1500mm a lot. Had creative solutions to get me through, but something with excessive MASS would have been the exception to my typical "stay-mobile" attitudes. -
Something is nagging at me to go back to smaller sensor
fuzzynormal replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
I only have to assume you're editing this stuff too. Once you're trying to edit footage from an inexperienced shooter using stabilization, it'll drive you mad. So many good shots wasted by the false stabilization shift. "Oh! This looks like it's going to be nice pan to the... [image does an ugly shift/hitch] ... ah fuck!" -
Cameraimage cinematography festival in the bin
fuzzynormal replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
"The media completely lied about the election forecast" Yet I was out here voting and worried about Harris winning. Why's that? All the reported polling forecasts I was reading about had it at a statistical tie. All polls were within the margin of error with many polls showing Donald trending to a slight lead. I was incredulous about it being so close going into election day because it's Donald, and, you know, all he does, how he behaves, and all the ridiculous authoritarianism he represents, but never thought for a minute the election wasn't a toss up. After all, eggs cost more now. All MSM I saw was reporting these fact. Lo and behold, look what happened. So, friend, where's the lie in that? What media do you consume that implies otherwise? And, bare with me here, could that particular narrative potentially be what is not true? The stories we tell ourselves. Ever curious. I suppose a good story always needs a bad guy? -
fuzzynormal reacted to a post in a topic: Next to be obsolete: Making a living
-
There it is. As it was as it shall be. It's just fast as hell these days because of tech. I like to lean into Robert Persig's philosophy of "metaphysics of quality" outlined in Zen and The Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. If true, then there's always going to be a cultural inherent yearning for things that transcend the bullshit. Now, I lean into it because I WANT it to be possible... But, as you say, (and Persig does as well) there's also always going to be people that can't appreciate it. Who wins out in this modern world? Hell if I know, but I know what team I'm on.
-
Ninpo33 reacted to a post in a topic: BBC: From Hollywood drone operator to homeless
-
BBC: From Hollywood drone operator to homeless
fuzzynormal replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Well, I'll tell you what, there ain't no way I'm laying the blame at the feet of labor in regards to the state of the biz here in SoCal. Any objective analysis of the industry over this past decade will reveal a much more complex narrative than the recent labor dispute. There's a bunch of chapters of that particular story that should focus on the board rooms foremost. Funny how that narrative has a hard time sticking in the popular media landscape, yeah? -
ntblowz reacted to a post in a topic: Psychological / physical effects of frame rate on the human body
-
sanveer reacted to a post in a topic: Psychological / physical effects of frame rate on the human body
-
Davide DB reacted to a post in a topic: Psychological / physical effects of frame rate on the human body
-
Psychological / physical effects of frame rate on the human body
fuzzynormal replied to CyclingBen's topic in Cameras
Gotta start making horror films @120fps. -
zlfan reacted to a post in a topic: Is DR that important?
-
I'm not watching the "myths" video posted here, but I really want to know how those differences in DR that are illustrated in the thumbnail would matter at all when it comes to storytelling? Not much, imo. DR important? Does it have roughly 12 steps? Good 'nuff for me. As for movies, I grew up watching $1 films at the end of their distribution run at the local "grindhouse." Movies always looked like shit in my world. Didn't care. Looked good enough to tell a story. Heck, one place I would go to that was built in an abandoned cotton gin had a single screen, and ran Pulp Fiction for 11 months straight. Guess what that projected film looked like on week 48. Also, the glory years of American cinema as an art form is the 70's. Y'all watch any 70's movies? They mostly looked like crap compared to the IQ of today. Watch Deliverance, for example. That's a more compelling movie than most anything that's been released from Hollywood in this current era. Excuse me. Got some clouds to go yell at.
-
ac6000cw reacted to a post in a topic: How Important Is The Colour Science Of A Camera?
-
Davide DB reacted to a post in a topic: How Important Is The Colour Science Of A Camera?
-
eatstoomuchjam reacted to a post in a topic: How Important Is The Colour Science Of A Camera?
-
kye reacted to a post in a topic: How Important Is The Colour Science Of A Camera?
-
All music at soundimage.org is now free for commercial use
fuzzynormal replied to Eric Matyas's topic in Cameras
You made it through an entire decade here. Impressive! -
Yeah, small unassuming kit and crew can be much more productive than the opposite when doing doc production. I can bear witness to this. Anyone else willing to testify? As for me, if someone told me a GH2 was all I had to make something, I'd shrug and do fine with it. I've done it before. Moreover, it would be fun and nimble. Okay by me. Yeah, I'm kind of done with fretting about perfect colors and resolution when it's much more important to get decent well shot coverage. I swear to god, I wish I had footage off a GH-ONE in the hands of a competent shooter for this current doc edit I'm doing --rather than the piles of sloppy handheld crap from an ARRI "cinematographer" that I'm trying to stitch together. Oooooooo, your pile of shit footage in my edit bins has more dynamic range? You got to play with a bunch of neat-o gear in the field for a year? Hooray, you used a jib. You had a portable video village? A PA? You broke out the steady cam? Your prime lens package cost more than my car? La dee daa. All your footage sucks and doesn't cut together. Great. (just spent the day in the editing room)
-
The BBC exists in a different production and financial context than independent documentaries. Even there, if the option was to capture something on a GH2, or not get it at all, they'd choose the GH2. Lucky for them, they don't have to worry about that.
-
Yeah, depends on what you really want to accomplish. I'm a doc guy so my first thought is: capture it or it didn't happen. Without story, well, what are you looking at? At least that's my tact. If rez or skin tones are less than optimum, I'll cope with it later, but at least I got it.
-
Are you looking for a sharpie reality out there? Really?
fuzzynormal replied to Emanuel's topic in Cameras
I just watched Inland Empire. Now what? -
Best I can do is a silver jumpsuit.