fuzzynormal

Thanks. Hope you like it. If you like dogs and airplanes, there's pretty good chance you'll enjoy the flick.

You're invited to watch the film (or trailer) my wife and I put together with a GH5 and G85. 95% of the shots were with Voights shooting f.095. It's a look. I also just re-bought a used 5dMII for less than $400. Full Frame and fast lenses for interviews is nice. Point is, if you want to play, play. Things are cheap. Have fun. http://www.flyingfurfilm.com

I shot something else tonight with an old lens. Took about an hour. This one I'll edit and upload fer sure

Same. Rugged stuff.

Whelp... No time to edit just yet, but here's some stills from footage. Will slap something together into a video soon, hopefully.

But wasn't "Tangerine" on Netflix for awhile? Netflix has this camera list, but really...what's the list specifically for? The programs they directly produce-for-hire? If I, independently, somehow made a wildly popular movie with the GH5, I don't think Netflix's end-all-be-all prerequisite is "what camera did you use?" That doesn't seem like a smart thing for them to do. Am I misunderstanding? (Probably)

No, not without IBIS --and you need a good one like from Oly. But with it, it's possible and actually rather easy.

A big reason I liked the Oly EM5II when it came out is because I could do quick slider shots handheld. You basically just adjust your body do a Tai Chi shift/drift and you can move the camera easily for an emulation of a slider. I also do this with my GH5, but Oly is still better at IBIS. But honestly, it's not so much the difference in IBIS as it is considered shot selection and disciplined technique.

Suffering through the infinite level of tweaks you can do in post to try and exploit the maximum DR out of a sensor is what I'm referencing. I personally don't have the patience for it. But yeah, hardware wise, I'd certainly upgrade to an Alexa for some of my work if I could.

Amen to that. I often wonder if chasing an extra half-step or so of Dynamic-Range is some sort of exercise in technical masochism among shooters rather than an actual sensible decision.

tbh, the good 'ol Canon 5DII was good enough for me. Ultimately, when I'm looking to get a shot it comes down to exposure and lighting anyway, if I'm pushing and pulling too much in post something went wrong when shooting the image. I'd love for a hybrid camera to have built in ND, but I've learned to adapt around it. I record audio out-board with a simple wireless mic system and small recorder. No issues there. My favorite hybrid cameras so far were the Lumix GX7 and EM5II. As you can tell, I'm pretty modest about things. I own the GH5 and use it alot, but it has a lot of features I don't bother with --and I feel like I overspent on it, based on MY needs. For instance, I'd shoot again with a GX7 in a heartbeat. Could probably buy one used for under $200.

Haven't read the spec sheet too closely yet. Is that 6-stops in tandem with an OIS lens --or done all in body?

It's "Misty." Jazz Classic. So much of a standard song that Clint Eastwood made a movie around it. The tune is by Erroll Gardner. For my money the best rendition of the song is from Ella Fitzgerald. Best sax rendition? I'll go with Sonny Stitt. Saginaw, MI represent! Look at me, helpless like a kitten up a tree... Anyone want an internet rabbit hole to go down? "Misty" will take through the pinnacle of mid-century American music.

2x. I suppose I could put it on a speedbooster, but nah.

I'll probably shoot it with a variable ND @f2.8; depends on the time of day and location, really. Would rather shoot it "clean" but the variable ND might be necessary depending on the situation. Not really worried about it performing well enough though --even through filters. Trying to figure out what to actually film is the next step. Should be an interesting challenge just to shoot something in general, as the focal length is going to be kind of long.

Just realized my wife has an old Helios-44-2 from her Zenit-E 35mm camera. The glass is a bit of a loose wobbly thing, but all I need for it is a M42-M43 adapter and I'll be good to go. I think I'll put it on the GH1 I have buried in the closet and see how it goes. Need to find something to film now.

"It isn't the cinema of human beings." He's right, literally.

I'll do it. Used to have a J9 years back, but sold it. Time to get back into some funky lenses.

I just like Oly cams. Even though they don't get you excited on the spec sheet, when you use one it just makes a difference (for me). It's not easily explainable. I just always chalk it up to this: it's why someone likes a certain car over another similar model in class. There's always some collection of intangibles that add up to a sum greater than the parts. Some machines just harmonize with ones tastes and desires.

FWIW, if someone told me I had to shoot a movie on an x-pro2, I'd be perfectly okay with that.

https://youtu.be/VujCOwa89ug

Xpro-2 is a fixed lens OVF with overlay guidelines and info if you want it. It’s a cool novelty. The thing I like about OVF is that is allows you to take in the whole scene in front of you as it’s a pretty wide view Whenlooking though the lens via EVF it’s kind of “tunnel vision,” which is good for some stuff too.

Easiest solution: Edit with proxies and you can use just about any computer. “Just about any computer” will allow you to keep your budget very low.

OTOH, I think it would be a good exercise to show how creating a watchable video doesn't necessarily require high IQ. But, yeah, that doesn't really fit the vibe of this forum, does it?

Yeah, and in my corner of the world, at my economic level, that's pretty much all I could afford to attend. So for me, a love/hate relationship with film image IQ. You can see remastered films look glorious, (anyone seen Gone With the Wind in a modern theatre? My god!). But then I remember film looking like absolute shit too. Film is the IQ king, but film also managed to be the pauper. "Rode hard and put away wet" is an apt 19th century metaphor. You could destroy a beautiful animal by mistreating it. Anyway, point being, you would have to seriously agree to degrade IQ for this challenge suggestion --in order to make it a real challenge.