sudopera

I have to say that I really like the image overall, especially the colours. That dirt track browns and foliage greens look very natural.

Some interesting news about Shogun future updates(around 5min:50sec) from Atomos CEO Jeromy Young.

I'm not a big fan of facebook comments or any other social networks variations and if that is a requirement, to me it's better as it is now. I understand your worries about inflation of trolls if you enable regular comments below posts, so again it's maybe best to leave it like this. Just my opinion.

Beautiful image but the price not so beautiful.

Affordable and good RAM for iMac, Macbook Pro etc. OWC - http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/apple/memory/ - I have it and it`s great in my mid 2011 21.5 iMac and they tested and verified that you can put 32GB(4x8) no matter that Apple says 16GB CRUCIAL - http://uk.crucial.com/gbr/en OWC also has external thunderbolt raid storage with good prices: http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Thunderbolt/

Still that green/yellow problem in skintones on most of the models on my imac, just like in that clip with P. Bloom in it.

On top of the page you have free film grain for download, here is the link: http://www.vision-color.com/free-stuff/ Put the clip with grain on top of your main clip, set the blend mode to overlay and adjust opacity to your liking

As I understood, if you want to color correct footage before you apply the LUT, you have to put it on the adjustment layer because in fcp effects applied directly to clip always have priority over color board so RT adjustment layer is a workaround for that. If you use scanned grain as a separate clip above your main footage and put LUT above those two clips on the adjustment layer, then I think LUT is the last thing that affects the image.

Maybe you could try to denoise, then apply grain directly to clip and put LUT on the adjustment layer above the clip.

I saw no issues with Jacob Nielsen's 10bit footage, only thing that I noticed is that all the film stocks (didn't try Lomo stocks, fcp crashes) except Kodak Vision3 5219 made the lips and cheeks of the girls in Jacob Nielsen's footage look dark brownish red, but in reality the color is pinkish. Kodak 5219 looks nice to me, colors are right and the change is subtle but footage loses some of that digital look, I think it's a good starting point to my grade. I don't own a GH4 so can't test possible banding issues.

Some more info on ImpulZ LUT-s http://blog.sherifmokbel.com/?p=220

Look at these two beauties on GH4: And by the way, does someone know what is the difference between these 3 besides different design: http://www.ebay.com/itm/P-Angenieux-Paris-17-68mm-f2-2-Type-4x17B-Zoom-Lens-for-C-Mount-16mm-Bolex-/291158325640?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item43ca637988 http://www.ebay.com/itm/SUPER-16-ANGENIEUX-ZOOM-2-2-17-68MM-F-2-2-C-MOUNT-LENS-16MM-MOVIE-CAMERA-2-/181434530203?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item2a3e57399b http://www.ebay.com/itm/SUPER-16-TINY-ANGENIEUX-2-2-17-68MM-C-MOUNT-ZOOM-LENS-S16mm-Movie-Camera-/271414813947?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item3f319564fb

Delboy used to say "He who dares, wins", over here we could say "He who shares, wins" :)

I've played a bit with ImpulZ and Jacob Nielsen's GH4 footage, small corrections on the clips, VisionColor grain on top set to overlay(10% opacity) and Kodak Vision3 5219 FC LUT(GH4 CinelikeD profile) on the RT adjustment layer. Here is the link for the ProRes 422HQ file download: https://copy.com/4P2WKLyAXo7U

I saw your post earlier and thought maybe there is some way to have an adjustment layer in fcp. Then I googled it and here it is, great stuff :)

Just found a way to use an adjustment layer in FCPX, used it with VisionColor LUT-s and renders much faster this way. Also you can make your primary corrections directly on the clip and put LUT on the layer. Here is the link for the custom made adjustment layer: http://www.rippletraining.com/using-the-adjustment-layer-title-in-final-cut-pro-x.html Really like these ImpulZ LUT-s by the way

Thanks for the info. It seems that it could be one of those hit and miss situations because they have 5yr warranty.

@com21 Thanks for your answer. I suppose they should work with 100 Mbit/s 4K, but probably not with ALL-I 200 Mbit/s 1080p.

I have found these on B&H and they are quite inexpensive: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1016076-REG/pny_technologies_p_sdx64u1h_ge_64gb_elite_sdxc_uhs_1_card.html http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1016077-REG/pny_technologies_p_sdx128u1h_ge_128gb_elite_sdxc_uhs_1_card.html http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1016078-REG/pny_technologies_p_sdx256u1h_ge_256gb_elite_sdxc_uhs_1_card.html/prm/alsVwDtl Customer reviews on B&H are all positive so I'm interested, are they reliable and would they work with GH4 4K?

I believe Inazuma's question was how there is no glow on the bulb in the shot without filter.

All I can think of is that the bulb is dimmed or lower wattage, maybe some milky coating on the glass. Probably someone has a better explanation. Edit: Also I suppose that everything is placed further away from the black background, so light from the bulb doesn't spill on the background.

Just found this, nice demonstration. They are working on making 4K version available.

My main issue with this is that I license music for my commercial videos(mostly from Envato) and every time I upload, I will have to prove that I own a license for music to a video based website that is not an owner of those rights. Bureaucracy, bureaucracy... why make it easy, when you can make it more complicated.