ken

​EF70-300L for sure, the king of the 70-300 lenses, no other competitor. You can find comparison on http://www.dxomark.com/ , much shorter size than 70-200L.

Should be the new vertical pixiel = (original vertical pixiel) /1.33333333....

Looks like unsqueezed ratio incorrect.

believe or not?

​You can try to use heat gun.

For less vignette, here is the comparison, wider is better. IMO, 16H/8Z > Schneider ES ≈ ISCO integrated > others, 16F, 16D.... Actually, large rear glasses benefit a little bit.

Looks like there is difference between kowa 16d and sankor/singer 16d. But they are not wide ana lens anyway. Only 16h is the widest 2x ana lens. Look the shape can tell, its diameter>length, none else has.

They have same diameter basically. I don't own 16d, but from the info online, for FF camera, it can use 135mm. But 16h can go to below 85mm for sure without vignetting.

Widest one is kowa 16h, not 16d. Many ana lenses are wider than 16d.

​Why? As an amateur, landscape is the major shooting object. No wide angle, no blue sky, no 3D view......

Ship to US only, why post here?

​ That looks like huge difference compare to the one (DS-1609-37) I had before, its sample as following. Taking lens is Nikon E 50mm 1.8 on Canon 6D. Only centre part is sharp, so it is focused.

I thought your video is 2:1, not 2.66:1, not right?

Can you tell us which Century lens is so sharp. I guess it might be the focusable one.

You need a "Redstan Anamorphic Lens Front Filter Clamp", which is available on Ebay.

​BMPCC is already 16:9. You add 1.5x and still get 2:1(18:9)? What is the point?

Please see pics. the right one with filter thread(non rotating) added. Also many batch of them have no FL mark on anamorphic lens.

Don't understand Why using 4:3 on BMPCC to get 2:1 with 1.5x anamorphic lens? Did you see the forum said "Only people who think in wider than 2.35:1 allowed! "?

No, all the anamorphic lens part are the same. The focus length is just for different size of screen or movie theater use.

With dioptre, F1.2 is not bad.

I am using a +0.5 vivita, it is ok enough. I don't think it makes difference between 0.4 or 0.5 on Century anamorphic lens. I think most blare will contribute by Century.

​I think so. Even 16H (about 500G) won't fit FM. Schneider fits FM perfectly.

Omg, that might be over 1kg, no comparison. If you don't mind the bulky lens, ISCO HD attachment would be better. The Schneider lens is only good for FM module I think.

As I know, they have the same optic structure (4 glasses 2 group?), assumed you said Sscheider ES and ISCO integrated lens. ISCO's lens is smaller, and more easy to focus. ISCO was merged not long ago, around 200? year?

​As the info I got, LA7200 and generic are not too bad. I can show a sample taken by Century's lens if one interested in.