ken

Anyway, dispointed the IQ.

IMO, avoid century. I have very bad experience with it.

I use in both end with negative filter, make sharper images. Sometimes, +0.5 filter needs reversely installed. I think that looks like is closer/similar the curve with anamorphic front glass.

no twitter, no facebook, noway?

Unfortunately, not good alignment yet. And distortion is severe. I think too wide taking lens used.

Yes, just come back today. It is down for a while.

Redstan is down. Only can find from eBay if you are lucky.

​Cannot agree that, IMO, "make stretching the image a huge loss" is the 1.33x lenses. All the 2x lenses have the best images.

Hi there, do you think this lens image is ok? BTW, please choose 1080p HD to play.

​I have been thinking this lens for a while, and see how good it is for its $1k price. Do you have any chance to compare this anamorphic lens to other 1.33x? I just curious about the image quality.

I thought SLR anamorphic lens is amount the best in 1.33x. It is better than LA7200. But CA still can be seen. How about Letus, will be better?

IMO, it cannot beat 16H, only sharpness is comparable. I think 16h's flare is stronger, but the color is different. BTW, your lens has better flare(green) than other blue start one. 16h's advantage is wide angle, no others can compete, except LOMO 35mm, but not sure the new SLR one. Who can tell that, very appreciated.

​Based on the calculation from FF's 100mm , 50mm lens on M43 is safe to use. But if you have small front glass lens, it might work down to 40mm I guess. BTW, I think the link's price is a little bit over.

Why not sold? The winner don't pay?

There were a post about VM lens, please find it. IMO, VM lens is really tiny, only for very small sensor camera, like Pentax Q. And it has no focus ability, so no comparison with single focus anamorphic lens.

if I have that money, would like this better : http://www.slrmagic.co.uk/slr-magic-achromatic-diopter-set.html

looks like DIY's FM module with ISCO integrated lens.

I don't have this lens. But basically others have ring and tiny screws (on side) to remove it.

Schneider Kreuznach WA Cinelux Anamorphic is a big lens, not ES, similar to ISCO HD attachment. Just order the close size (must be bigger) tripod mount support.

One 16H can buy more than 3 of this ISCO integrated lens. 16D, I think is still more expensive than ISCO's. It has very good optics, only except flare. But I thank every one at least need 2 anamorphic lenses, one of them with best optics without flare.

No, 8Z is imperial unit too. This is the only metric one.

Elmoscope II, one of the rebrand 16H/8Z, only marks distance by metric system I like.

Mine is 67mm for $1, perfect, it still fits original front cap.

Iscorama 54 MC x1.5 Anamorphic adapterhttp://www.ebay.com/itm/231515925409 May be your key words unusual.

No thing wrong, only you posted as "Ships to: Worldwide" then other country's Ebay website would translate to their language, and searchable to theirs.