Jump to content

ken

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    573

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ken

  1. ken
    The price is dropping. http://www.ebay.com/itm/222024991330
  2. ken
    I mean this. http://www.ebay.ca/itm/272133360567
  3. ken
    Are you sure? I will take it.
  4. ken
    Hi all, found another one never seen. http://www.ebay.com/itm/291691415090 Who knows about it?
  5. ken
    Any one knows about this lens, fixed focus. http://www.ebay.com/itm/121900366906 The diopters are mounted on rear, why?
  6. ken
    16D=16F, in terms of angle, but is just a bigger version, needs 135mm on FF. Try 16H/8Z...the widest 2x, except LOMO 35MM, works with 85mm on FF.
  7. ken
    Basically, for full frame, 2x Ana lens can go 85mm. 1.33x Ana lens can go to 40mm. For 16:9 video, a little be more. 1.33x can use 35mm prime lens.
  8. ken
    Looks all 1.33x Ana lenses are difficult to get clear image on edge. Soligor is better then acceptable, and lighter then century's.
  9. ken
    Wider means less vignetting for using the same prime lens. I still own it. It has similar size as 16F. But shorter, and have bigger front glass. So it could be used on wider taking lens. So I just simply said it is wider.
  10. ken
    I owned it before, that is the poorest ana lens I had. If you accept the IQ, I have no words.
  11. ken
    Who bought this, must regret. http://www.ebay.com/itm/141889067943 So I doubt Century had ever made good lenses.
  12. ken
    I think that might be second widest to 16h in below $500 lenses. But need to use small diameter prime lens.
  13. ken

    Anamorphic and Zooms

    ken replied to artiswar's topic in Cameras

    These two Canon lenses work fine, 58mm front thread not rotating. 70-210 lens has better IQ.
  14. ken
    Can watch directly. imo, sharpness is good enough, just the flare is not better than iPhone's shooting.
  15. ken
    Cannot see no account.
  16. ken
    Simple Formula: Original ratio x anamorphic extension rate = New ratio So 16:9 with 2x=32/9
  17. ken
    I have a Vivitar +0.5 lens, 67mm, marks as 1/2, as pictures, for sharing info.
  18. ken
    Wow, 138mm. Fits Panasonic LA7200? http://www.ebay.ca/itm/252191133535
  19. ken
    Hi, I am only interested in kowa lens. Do you consider sell it separately?
  20. ken
    IMO, that is pricey. I also bought the SLR's +0.33 &+1.33 set already. http://www.ebay.com/itm/271994594777 I think they are double element too.
  21. ken
    Just got this one http://www.ebay.com/itm/161898434253 , very happy with it. It is a new item. Looks like a good deal compare to original price.
  22. ken
    because its focus in near distance, you need let it to focus at infinity. You can try adding a negative diopter in rear or front to do that. Imo, it should work.
  23. ken
    My understanding is, the 43mm rear glass of Ana lens could be treated as the front aperture of the 77mm prime lens. Then looks like it would reduce more than 2 steps.
  24. ken
    I got the widest FOV is from iPhone with Moondog Ana lens, 29/1.33=22.
  25. ken
    From websites, iphone 5s lens has 29mm equivalent FL. So get about 22mm view angle. From the moon's size can tell. Flare is not too bad.
×
×
  • Create New...