deezid

48P is availabe in NTSC and Cinema modes in 10 bit on the S1H 😉

Also I have to go really hard on neat video to create this look in the second picture 🤣

Sony didn't care fixing the temporal noise reduction issues and oversharpening since the A7s2. So, no break for Sony. This is not a camera made for narrative work. The Sony Videolook and missing DCI4K and missing shutter angles and true 24p made it quite clear. I honestly expected much more.

You mean they kept the noise reduction artifacts and oversharpening? Yep, they did indeed. The ZV-1 looks the same even.

that would also work with my manual lenses 😄

"All I want is the perfect camera..." Sadly there's no such thing. The Sony sounded great on paper but the footage looks super underwhelming because of the heavy processing especially.

True, but I'm not going to sacrifice image quality, color science, DCI4K, true 24p, shutter angles, waveform, a screen I can use outside of available light and reliability over proper autofocus. And yes, I wish autofocus was somewhat usable as it would push sales for sure. 😉

The ZV-1 and A7s3 look the same, only that the latter has more dynamic range. Since Sony uses the same processing algorithms throughout their alpha cameras since the A7sII why wouldn't it? Here some examples for the horrible oversharpening (left, also showing aliasing issues) and paint brush like noise reduction with ghosting and smearing (right).

I mean it's not a V-logger camera, more like a cinema workhorse which could be used as an A-camera image wise even.

Sony is king when it comes to noise reduction (and sharpening). If that's a good thing or not is highly subjective. I'd rather have a an organic looking image than the digital madness the a7s3, a73, a6600, a7s2 etc. offer.

Well, lots of sharpening halos on the Sony. Other videos show lots of artifacts in darker areas and low light, due to heavy temporal noise reduction - some shots look like straight paint brush or an oil painting. I don't want that. Thanks Sony for making my decision to keep the S1H so much easier. 🙂

What's the title of this? The great Oompa Loompa escape? Or How Sony discovered Cinelike D?

The A7sIII overheats even faster it seems. The A7sIII overheated more quickly in exactly the same lighting, so it's indeed worse than the R5 even.

Here's a painting made by the A7sIII from Philip Bloom's video. I just stay with my S1H which after firmware 2.0 and Noise Reduction -1 looks just perfect. The NR smoothing and smearing looks like on the A73.

Gerald Undone measured 13 stops (SNR=0.5). But also measured the A73 and Pocket 4K with much higher numbers than usual. So my guess, he would measure the S1H higher as well 😉

Pretty sure it uses a 12 bit adc mode for video, too. Dynamic range seems to be the same as the S1H.

Downloaded the original 188Mbit H265 file on Vimeo in case you meant me. 😉

well, it looks as bad as the other S1H ProRes videos I've seen. Always super harsh with a terrible roll-off and low dynamic range for whatever reason.

Oh well, most of the low light stuff looks like paint brush. I can do the same with my S1H, just apply insane amounts of Neat Video Temporal NR on it... Most people don't seem to care, so it's ok I guess?

The IMX410 on the S1H/S1/Mavo LF/A73/FX9/F6/Z6 etc. is a 12 bit ADC only design. BMD usually uses 14 ADC on their flagship models.

I'm just glad they are finally fixing their color science. Can't wait to try out V5 on my older footage and see what it does to bright saturated lights 😄

And a colorscience update please, so I don't have to worry about saturated blue or red light sources.

"That's 8K!"- captain obvious

Well, of course Canon finds a way to screw things up, wouldn't be Canon otherwise Why wouldn't they simply implement active cooling? Even the S1H does

meh