gatopardo

Something like the LS300 Virtual Scan Mapping function would be great.

3 seconds maybe. The buffer doubled the size to 3gb. IF dual card is used to clear part of it 3 seconds might be possible...

aprox. 20MB x 60= 1200 MB/s crazy stuff .

Does a Canon EF to m43 bodies Speedbooster XL with EF zoom lens + IBIS - do automatic focal length report? Or we have to dial the focal length every time we change the zoom for IBIS to work properly? Anyone tried it with sigma EF zooms? Thanks.

Luke hinted that already

http://www.getolympus.com/digitalcameras/omd/e-m1-mark-ii.html?ref=CJ "[Pro Capture H]　approx. 60 fps with selectable 15, 20, 30, 60 fps" [Sequential shooting H]　approx. 15 fps with selectable 10-15 fps [Sequential shooting L]　approx. 10 fps with selectable 1-10 fps [Anti-shock sequential shooting L]　approx. 8.5 fps with selectable 1-8 fps [Silent sequential shooting H]　approx. 60 fps with selectable 15, 20, 30, 60 fps [Silent sequential shooting L]　approx. 18 fps with selectable 1-10, 15, 18 fps [Pro Capture H]　approx. 60 fps with selectable 15, 20, 30, 60 fps [Pro Capture L]　approx. 18 fps with selectable 1-10, 15, 18 fps *When using the M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO *Maximum sequential shooting speed may be affected by several factors including lens used, brightness, aperture, shutter speed, and ISO setting. *When in Pro Capture mode, slower shutter speeds and flash can not be used。 *When ISO is 8000 or above, 30 fps becomes the maximum sequential shooting speed, and the actual shooting speed may become slower than the set shooting speed by a few frames per second. When using ISO Bracketing, performance will be affected at ISO 2000 or above. *Focus and exposure are fixed at the values of the first shot when using sequential shooting H. *Maximum sequential shooting speed is 8.5 fps for anti-shock sequential shooting L, even when set to 9 or 10 fps.

http://www.getolympus.com/digitalcameras/omd/e-m1-mark-ii.html?ref=CJ

This might be a very good camera.

I don't think it looks ok. Look at the mountains edges at 1:24. Just horrible. Maybe turnig down the sharpening helps. Even the EOS CLOG may help. But the footage in this video is horrible IMHO.

Looks worst than the 80d... This could be a very usefull camera.... but no. just for photography...

Sensor: Effective pixels 24.2 million pixel APS-C CMOS (total number of pixels 25.8 million pixels) Those extra pixels are used for the electronic stabilization process?

Let's see how the EOS M5 1080p is. (No hope for 4k) With the viewfinder, dual pixel AF and maybe the same sensor this can be a fun camera to use too. http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/sketches-claimed-new-canon-eos-m5/

GH line never had IBIS. Previous GX cameras have it. I think that's the way panasonic differentiates camera lines and features.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/news/unveiled-canon-xc15-upgraded-follow-xc10 - New color matrix profiles - New Highlight Priority gamma that functions as an HDR setting for high-contrast scenes - Low-light performance has been improved - Autofocus speed is now almost double the speed of previous versions and has three adjustable speeds.

@Mattias Burling Mattias, have you finished your LS300 review? Is it still a good option?

@Andrew Reid Will you show us your XC10 footage made this summer? or even a re-review?

It's no far from 1500$ http://cvp.com/index.php?t=product/canon_0565c011aa

You are right.

XC15 (new XC10) is a possibility! : http://www.canonwatch.com/canon-xc15-camcorder-coming-soon-xc15-mention-support-page-suggests-cw4/

I don't know where that number (1.7) came from. to my calculations it's 1,91 for a 1:1 4k readout. And, if true, that's too much crop in my opinion. Even a tokina 11-16 would be a 21mm FOV that may not be wide enough.

The MJPEG makes perfect sense in this primarily STILL images camera. Is the perfect codec to pull still images from video. I think thats why it is there.

1:1 pixel 4k is a 1,91 crop of FF area, to my calculations. more micro 4/3 than super 35mm.

http://***URL removed***/reviews/fujifilm-x70-review/5

Jello party