Deadcode

Is there anything you don't hate? 😄 You are against everything popular or successful. You write articles about stuff you dont even see in person... and when people questions your credibility (C5D) you instantly outcry instead of rethinking your statements, and how did you end up there..

Please post some original files.

Log is a compressed representation of the sensor dynamic range. 14 EV with slog2/slog3 on paper. 8/10 bit image capture represents the resolution of this dynamic range. 4 times more gradiation with 10 bit recording. Log vs flat: if you under/overexpose your image without crushing/clipping, you can recover the image perfectly without any tonality or color issues with log recording (on paper...) but this is not possible with flat recording

It's almost the same comparison as Neat Video vs Resolve's own noise reduction. It gets the job done waay faster than a 3rd party plugin, but the results are not the best. Worth the trade off? Depends on your needs. I ditched Neat years ago, but i prefer rsmb over the built in solution

110 sec processing time for the 52s long 1080p 24p h264 clip with NVENC acceleration. So around 13 fps processing speed. Without RSMB the processing time is 14 s, so this effect is very taxing even in 1080p. Config: i7 3770, 16GB, GTX1070, RSMB 5.0, Resolve Studio 16.1

Ultrapro pure scientific test GoPro Hero 7 @ 2,7K 24/30/60/120fps Resolve, 23,976 fps timeline, Reelsmart motion blur, blur corrected to framerate of course frame drop can occur, no retime/frame blend correction To my eyes the 120 is very nice, but the difference in this scene is less then what i expected.

It works, just tested 24p timeline, 120fps footage, corrected amount of blur, and it's a beauty

ReelSmart Motion Blur can give you nice results, however in complex scenes there are a tons of glitches. Make a selfie video and wave to the camera. Or just follow a moving object like a car while turning with the camera. But if you record in 50p and your timeline is 25p you can get better results.

Not much sony left 😄 A7r3? or your old favourie: RX1

Based on the out of focus roll-off and the sharpness i think the lens is 24-35mm ish. In 35mm terms You have plenty of fast glass and boosters, however nowdays you are a medium format fan. Out of camera milky shadows? Probably a fuji cam with some in camera tweaking. I would vote the following 3 players based on your past comments and articles: S1, GFX100, Sigma Fp If graded: S1 If out of cam: GFX100

Please do a Sigma FP video review. I would love to see 4-5 minutes shorts, each show different aspects of the camera. 5 min about DR in different bith depth modes, 5 min low light against A7 III / S1 / etc, 5 min about color comparison. My favourite videos from you are the comparison shots between cameras. Or one big 20min+ long review, but it's a really big project

You are so easily offended, you must be from the USA Mark Romero 2: you can give any camera a nice roll-off and desaturated highlights in post, if the scene's dynamic range dont exceed the sensor dynamic range.

It's not easy to vlog on an Arri. Sure it has nice IQ, but really that's the only thing that matters? (however you can match a BMPCC4K easily...)

This is the point of this topic.

You dont really get the point of the topic do ya? 😄

Here are my perdictions: A phone or phone like camera with a good quality sensors. Nice low light thanks to TNR, huge DR thanks to multi exposure recording. I want to: - choose the focal length in post - choose the amount of DOF and DOF type in post (Vazen 40 T2 if i want, Sigma 85 1.4 if i want) - one - click - grade = Arri look if i want, Transformers look if i want - i want to choose the amount of hypersmooth 5.0 stabilization in post on the fly While recording, i dont want to deal with: - framing - exposure, WB - AF So i want to record and decide what i want in post.

These feature list is appealing for todays standard. And C500 Mk II checks most requirements today. R5 too...

So like a C500 Mk 2? Or an R5? Come on guys, you just writing spec that are mostly exist today. (except Kye :P) 5 years from now these spec are really appealing to you? i mean you would spend money 5 years from now on camera with 2020 spec? On different aspect: why would not everyone of you rush to buy the 5 years old dream camera the A7s mk I or GH4? for 2015 both had insane spec! And it cost only 800-900 eur (500 or less for GH4) nowdays... So the R5 for example in 2025 will probably be obsolete.

Let me rewind the time to 2015 April: - A7s just announced, clean ISO6400?! 4K with external recorder? - GH4 is the 4K king, no IBIS, VLog-L is not announced yet! (2015 sep) - A7 II with IBIS woah! - 5D Mark III is flying with RAW recording What everyone want: RAW (still persist :D), fullframe look (no speedboosters yet for APSC!), LOG, 4K, 1080 HFR. Noone talking about IBIS or AF

We are talking about 2025 spec not 2020. Internal ProRes in 2025? You want to edit huge files on a 2015 laptop in 2025? H.266 is the future.

We can see fake dof with phones, iPhone HDR blending is sick. Both needs a lot of improvement, but your cinema camera will be your smartphone by 2025?

All of you know the R5 spec. The dream camera, 8K RAW, 4K 120fps, IBIS, variND adapter. The A7s III expectations are raising. It's easy to say "i want this feature to buy that camera today, or i wait for for the mark II" It's much harder to perdict what will be the killer feature in 5 years from now. And you have to develop the camera of 2025 now in 2020. What will be your dream camera of 2025? By 2023 8K 60 fps raw will be "meh", gimbal like IBIS is the key? (FX9) Or 16EV+ DR? (C300 Mk III) 16K 120fps RAW + dolly like EIS + 20EV DR fullframe for 1500 eur are really "must have" features of 2025, or we reached a necessity wall with the R5?

Im just smiling in the dark quietly you just finished your first excercises in your homework. A lot more will come

AWB is a no go. When i tried to match my a6300 to my 5D i tried to measure the AWB differences. The problem is: In broad daylight the WB diff with the same lens was around 2-300K, indoors it was 5-600K or even more. The Sony went for the perfect WB, the Canon went for the moody WB... I created WB shifter LUT's for my daylight/indoor LUT, and i always had to touch the image, it was never matched perfectly. Would you please share some footage? im curious about the BMMCC image.

@kye do your homework, prove me im wrong Sidenote: it will only work if the WB is set perfectly before shot and the exposure is the same in every shot. Just like with GHAlex.