Deadcode

https://www.filmconvert.com/ Try the trial version, it can do pure magic with 5D Cinestyle.

Few tips: after you transcoded the footage with GoPro Studio, you can set the white balance-sharpness-contrast (dont use the built in Protune LUT, it causes color channel clipping in the highlights after extreme WB shift). After that you dont have to encode the files, just search the transcoded cineform and import to your NLE. If you shift WB in GoPro Studio, the changed color will appear in the NLE imported Cineform without any further action. GP Studios sharpening works very good with Hero's footage These daylight footages are around 6000-6500K WB, you can have good results in gradeing without GoPro Studio (Hero 3 is warmer about 300-400K)

For a few days i put some clips to my Google drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B9d46mzo8guUZVR3dnNsMWlVNGs?usp=sharing Hero 3 Black, 2,7k, 30fps wide, Protune, CameraRaw WhiteBalance. If you want correct colorbalance, you have to postprocess them through GoPro Studio. It have a special color matrix for this kind of footage, you can tweak the image almost like raw Hero 3+ Black have Protune 2.0 which has much more options to customize Hero 4 Black is using Protune 2.0 too. My settings for the uploaded clip: 4K 30p wide, Native WhiteBalance, -0,5 EV compensation, Flat, Low Sharpness. GoPro Studio required here too.

Horisontal x vertical x fps x bit depth / 8 (=1 byte) = Bps == 1920x1080 x 24 x 14 / 8 = 8709120 = 83 MB/s. The limit for the 5D3 card interface is around 95MB / s, which means backwards, the highest possibile framerate is 38 fps at 10 bit, 1920x1080, but we are far from that right now.

I have Lexar 64GB 1066x, and it's unreliable with 5D2... broken raw still image files, corrupted compressed video. ML Raw is better but black frames/no audio can easily occur. Should i avoid KomputerBay 64GB 1000x? Do anyone have experiance which is the most reliable card for 5D mark II? Im thinking about Sandisk Extreme Pro 64GB 160MB/s. With 5D2 i only need 70MB/s stable write speed for 1728x972 25fps with sound. (Tried Kingstone 32GB 600x, 47MB/s write speed, but reliable)

I shoot a few second long clip in 2704x1520 at 24p with medium field of view where this camera gives the best quality Hero 4 Black settings: ProTune WB: Native (but i corrected it in GoPro Studio, so you only need to adjust luma curves in post) -0,5 EV exposure compensation Sharpness: Low FOV: Medium I transcoded it to ProRes, you can download it from here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bwoum3ZKc_jNRVlSZzNucXZac3M/view?usp=sharing And here is screengrab from a quick grade with filmconvert:

If we are talking about best image quality, yes the GoPro Hero 4 Black is still the king. Protune settings makes the Hero special. If "out of box" image quality is fine for you there are much better choices for the price such as the Xiaomi Yi (4K)

Go for cheap speedbooster if you dont afraid of manual focusing: http://www.zyoptics.net/product/zhongyi-lens-turbo-adapters-for-micro-four-thirds-cameras-m43/ Minolta MD / Canon FD mount is your best choice, and go for fast primes Here are the lens you can choose from if you go with Minolta: http://minolta.eazypix.de/lenses/ If you want to go native m43 mount, it's much more expensive, but you can have AF and stabilisation Your third option is to get a 4/3 to m43 adapter, and get cheap 4/3 lens. You can have AF + stab with this option, but good 4/3 are rare even on ebay

Why would you do that? Use MLVFS if you want to work with your raw video files! http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=13152.msg167826;topicseen#msg167826 Or use MLRawViewer for fast processing to folders http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=9560.msg167870;topicseen#msg167870 Or use MLVProducer if you want to process lots of files together http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=15271.0 You did not followed the magiclantern forums in the past 2 years do you? edit: Probably you have a lot of raw_rec (raw 1.0) files, you have to dig a little in the forums, there is a way to convert them to MLV_Raw (raw2.0) and use MLVFS on them. With MLVFS you dont need any conversion, you can see your raw sequences in DNG-s

The camera is Panasonic LX100 at ISO200, F4, auto shutter Settings: Standard with -5 contrast, iDynamic: Medium, -1,33 EV exposure, +3 highlights/-1 shadows Post: 16-255 to 16-235 remap, Filmconvert GH4 Standard profile, level adjusments to fill the waveform monitor, apply Osiris REC709 to LOG LUT, Neat noise reduction, export to 1080p Why did i do that? The footage is easily gradeble, you can have nice result with minor tweaks. With this camera settings the latitude is nice, but it costs a lot of noise. My short them goal is to learn more about colorgradeing from the forum members, and my long term goal is to make a "my camera to 1Dc LUT" for every camera out there, like Andrew Raid started with A7/NX1/GH4 camera guides Here is my "natural" screengrabs

Nice reds and greens, i like it! I removed the post stabilisation and exported without neat noise reduction, so expect some heavy grain in the low's Same footage in ProRes, without Stab and NR

Dayraven: The way you like it, what is "natural" for you and show some "filmic grade, like Mattias above In my mind: "dont burn the highlights" and most contrasty scenes i can find Mattias: I'll tell you tomorrow 35Mbps H264 export, maybe next time im doing a littlebit higher bitrate export. At the tree scene it falls apart even without grade I like your grade, but your footages usually have this look, so that was expected from you

Camera is irrelevant in this case i guess, but we can make another "guess the camera" if you want Yup, it's in Budapest, Hungary

Hi everyone! Are you looking for a footage for some practice gradeing? Or are you just bored? Download my footage, and show me what the colors should look like! I'm curious what you think about what looks good, or what looks "natural" or "filmic" for you. Post some screengrabs or your self-made LUT! Here is the 1 min long footage

3. 4K 8 bit > Colorgrade > denoise > dither > downscale Colorgrading can introduce some artefacts on the footage, the denoising should be your last step for best results. And it's not necessary to denoise all of the recorded footage, you can save a lot of time. Try all 3 variants and update the topic with your findings.

That's a very good performance for a mobile phone. I like the popping colors. Try Cinema4K app with 200Mbps codec and flat profile. The camera wobbing is very annoying, does Galaxy S7 use it's lens stabilisation when recording 4K or only at 1080p?

I don't understand you perfectly. What do i have to give you to create a proper Fuji LUT? I have several records with colorchecker, few raw files, and lot of .mp4's with different picture profile settings from Panasonic LX100. If i give you a dialed down clip from natural profile (aka. FLAT) you can create a LUT from it to look like a Fuji Provia? edit: thanks for your hard work!

I forgot that there is no speedbooster for C300

The second one is C300 II with Speedbooster? You said it's fullframe with speedbooster, so Panasonic dropped. Fuji X-Pro2 is nice but it has moire, Fuji dropped. The "best" 1080p Nikon is the first one, and i dont think you put another one in the comparison, so Nikon is dropped. You didnt gave any reaction for the top Sony cameras, so Sony is dropped. Best Samsung is already in the comparison.

Andrew, basically you want an FS5 with Panasonic logo on it. VLOG 2.0? What's the problem with the 1.0? Noise and 8bit. Noise is sensor based problem, and noone offers 10 bit internal recording at this price range. I think Panasonic will stick with the 20MP m4/3 sensor which is already developed. 6K fullreadout 4K is reasonable, 4K 60 fps is also possibile. In the past 2-3 years Sony produced some awesome products and even Panasonic is too slow to do a reasonable reaction to them. I dont think GH5 can grow up to the expectations.

Oh if it's a Q&A time, what about LX100 review part 2? "Stay tuned for the full review" in the last paragraph of your Shooting with a 4K pocket camera – the exceptional Panasonic LX100 review. You said a lot about it in several cases such as the Eos M3 review, and the camera appeard in several comparison videos. That headline kept me excited I got it you really like the camera, but you dont like the fixed lens

I have a question to the experts: If i want to use Neat Video Noise reduction, which is the best and fastest way to archive good result if my end project is 1080p? Record at 4K, Neat, then downconvert to 1080p, or i will not see huge difference if i downconvert first (Prores 4444 1080p), then use noise reduction on the downconverted footage? The speed difference is huge between the 1080p and 4K post NR. Above ISO1600 of course, because between ISO200-800 it's not worth my time, the image quality is good for me from the LX100.

LX100 is better than the RX100m3 in many cases (image quality wise...) Only the Mark4 worth the consideration. I had the MarkI, and i loved it, but LX100 is much better in almost any cases. MarkII is almost the same (ofc wifi and flipable screen and 24p is good). MarkIII got the full pixel readout and the EVF, so it's almost the same level with LX but without 4K!

That will be hard to decide... LX100 advantages: -15 min rec limit over 5 min in 4K - Cheaper - Can attach filters (43mm) without magfilter adapter - Battery life is much better on LX RX100 advantages: - Great 1080p with high fps (LX100: 50fps, line skipped with moire and aliasing) - SLOG2, and great high iso performance in video mode - very small, pocketable - build in flash which is very effective (and smaller than the LX100's attached flash) - flipable LCD Go for a used LX100 + a gimbal for the price of the RX100 Anyway i recorded this video with the LX100 and a Benro Monopod:

Im using FCPX and importing 4K files from card, then im making proxy (1/4 resolution = 1080p) files from everything. Im working with proxy's and it's butter smooth, the quality is OK, and it's easy to work with (4K timeline) Then im exporting in 4K Then creating a 1080p timeline, copy/paste from the 4K project, then exporting to 1080p, simple, fast easy, but storage space consuming.