Geoff CB

From interviews it seems the dummy battery is included.

Yup that Sony is INSANE. Razor sharp from wide open at every focal length with great background separation. I shot a corporate video and a wedding with it, $2K may be expensive, but that lens is worth it. Just don't have the money for it quite yet

It's caused by the browser unfortunately, so it will vary depending on which browser the person is viewing it on sees. Chrome causes a bad color shift for me, while Microsoft Edge is accurate. It's not a minor shift either :/

While we are at it how about a speedbooster for Canon lenses to nikon APS-C! Surely it can't be that complicated right?

Umm... no not everything is converted to film, in fact I'd say most movies are now never converted to film. And I can think of no film that that shot digitally and then printed on film then brought back to digital as you seem to imply.

Also with the distortion correction the 18mm is more like a 19mm. I've always found having the wide angle more useful than the long end. Also the 18-108, once you hit 85mm the sharpness falls off a cliff.

The 16-70 is a much better lens. I used the 18-105 and was not happy with it.

Does the ursa now have the option to shoot 2K 4444 with full sensor? I thought that was only cropped in.

They are idiots for not including it, but like others said, I would buy a used A7rII or A7s II and keep the a7s rather than go for A9. Or wait for the next A7s, which will surely have faster readout.

Easy way to outline the talent and make them seem "big". Lights up the environment and invokes the feeling of a real life concert performance.

Cooke optics has an awesome channel:

Love Capture One. Color editing is much more natural, and has a skin tone editing/white balance feature that I find invaluable. I enjoy my results better in it. Lightroom does have better organizational tools, and it's denoise is superior. Edit: Was going to post a comparison using the new version of Lightroom, but it crashed while I was editing

Yes only the studio version, playback is very smooth on my system, in line with H264.

Yeah this solved it for me as well.

Same, especially because it's supposed to have long battery life and can power my A7r II. Will be great to use one large battery instead of separate batteries for my camera and monitor. It's been a huge PITA dealing with the A7r II's battery life on shoots.

Under the key menu after applying a LUT to a node:

Once they fix the dropped audio issue glitch (no sound when playing on timeline) I'm switching.

I really don't have interest in this camera anymore. The URSA is too close in price with much better support. If I had plenty of spare cash I might have bought one to experiment, but for work? No, no longer the price/performance king.

Have links to any walkthroughs on that? hate the database storage

Seconded, thanks for the tip!

How is it a recorder as well? Don't see that in specs?

Yeah I have the same bug! I'm loving everything else I'm seeing, but they need to fix that ASAP. Judging by forums it's a widespread problem.

Yes it's a great editor, especially with the latest update.

I was working on a documentary that had a metric ton of nested sequences. Constantly crashing about halfway through. Contacted adobe and they suggested that I use less of them...I was halfway through.

This wording in their press: "Also another big issue in the film and television industry is audio. For years we have been sending audio off to people in the music industry to do our audio post production. Then we have to wait for them to finish and import the finished audio file back into our edit. It's very slow and cumbersome" Is pissing off a few audio people I know EDIT: On the great new audio side, the software finally added support for MP3.